Pedohysteria is USG’s Ideology…

…. Many of the things expressed in this Sub-Blog, I’ve addressed any number of times over the years. I don’t wish to analyze every video, etc., but I do find it valuable to share these kinds of video, etc., even if I disagree substantially with any of it…It’s important to acknowledge and embrace, that there are people out there, who are engaged in levelheaded discussion about “pedophiles”. – Steve

Date: April 06, 2018

01) Pedohysteria is USG’s Ideology

“Let me tell you why I focus on the things which I focus on.”

First they came for the pedophiles…

We Need a Moral Revolution:

“The dominant morality in our society is the “victimization-based morality.” It is a bad morality, that we need to replace.”

Sub-Blog Archive

8 thoughts on “Pedohysteria is USG’s Ideology…

  1. Yure

    Empowering people is better than keeping them weak and in need of protection. Victimology keeps people weak, rather than empowering them. It reflects on how we priorize punishment over education and protection over freedom.

    1. eqfoundation Post author


      …They’ve “protected” people right out of their own, natural ability to protect themselves.

      I’m a huge believer in personal empowerment.

      Children are sitting ducks, they way they are treated these days…I say, make them as wise as we can.

      1. Yure

        That’s what I did to my nephew. He is 12 and is wiser than most kids, not just in school content, most of which he doesn’t even like. Adults are often caught off-guard and think that he is “special” or has high IQ. None of that. He just learned what people often think that children can not learn. We doubt of their ability to learn and it seems like we safeguard ourselves from their quick development, by bringing down a child who exhibits a tendency to faster maturing.

      2. eqfoundation Post author

        “We doubt of their ability to learn and it seems like we safeguard ourselves from their quick development, by bringing down a child who exhibits a tendency to faster maturing.”

        Many people like their children best when they’re in that phase, where they’re small, cute, snuggly and [relatively] easy to handle…

        …They start evolving out of that, or spontaneously introducing things into their lives [and by extension, their relationship with their parents], which the parents imagine “should not be there”…and the parents are often unhappy about it.

        It’s a complexity, they feel they should not have to deal with…

        …Someone should educate parents before they become parents…that their children are sexual beings, right out of the womb.

        Sexual discovery is part of life…and parenting.

  2. feinmann0

    On the topic of sex trafficking, I see The Donald has signed off a new law that ‘paves the way for victims of sex trafficking to hold websites accountable for knowingly facilitating sex trafficking”: I also note from the article that ‘while the problem is chronically under-reported and there is no official estimate of the total number of victims in the US, an estimate from advocacy group Polaris puts the number of victims nationally “into the hundreds of thousands when estimates of both adults and minors and sex trafficking and labor trafficking are aggregated.”’ I assume that it is in the interest of Polaris to pluck an imaginary and unverifiable high number from the air to further its cause. This is precisely what the FBI did when it claimed the existence of a $billion child porn industry to stoke the fires of paedohysteria. It is precisely what child care charities in the UK have done successfully for a decade or more to instill fear and anxiety in a public who respond by vomiting donations into the fraudsters’ laps. False accusers too have jumped upon the corrupt bandwagon by assuming the status of victim and reporting historic sexual abuse; they know their anonymity will be preserved, and they know the chances of receiving a big fat payout from tax payers via a failed legal system, will be high. They have nothing to lose.

    Tom Grauer’s analyses are spot-on in my view in the clips above. Where I think he is mistaken is the lack of mention of boy-love and the promotion of girl-love in his male sexualist blog topics. This must be due to an unconscious heterosexual bias on his part. I would argue, and have argued on his now defunct dailyantifeminist blog, that so often it is boys that seek adult male companionship, that it is boys that would benefit most from: a society-wide recognition that sexual attraction to kids is just another normal and acceptable strand of human sexuality, and that it is boys that would benefit from a society-wide recognition of the needs of boys.

    Tom Grauer’s new blog the triweeklyantifeminist, picks up once more on the formation of a male sexualist movement and lays out the rules for admission here: Apparently, to be a male sexualist, one must support the following: abolition of the age of consent; legalisation of: child pornography, child prostitution, non-consensual sex; abolition of: all “sex crime” legislation; all laws, policies and social conventions that discriminate against men; structuring all of society in a way that benefits men. The male sexualist perspective is therefore ‘the diametrical opposite of the Puritan-Feminist perspective’. My take is that such an extreme set of beliefs are truly only fully held by psychopaths. Those who claim to say it is OK to use violence against another human being, specifically non-consensual sex, irrespective of age, are either being dishonest, or deeply psychopathic. I doubt very much whether Tom Grauer would idly stand by and watch his own child be sexually abused against its will by an adult, and in the absence of any recourse to any law. So I guess I could never call myself a male sexualist on Tom Grauer’s terms, but on my own terms I most definitely am.

    1. eqfoundation Post author

      “Polaris puts the number of victims nationally “into the hundreds of thousands when estimates of both adults and minors and sex trafficking and labor trafficking are aggregated.”

      Can you imagine the foot print something like that would leave?…It could not be hidden…”everyone” would be knowing people it was happening to…And it would condemn our culture, if such a degree of apathy over “sex slavery” were being tolerated.

      Of course, the people who sell this story are schysters.

      “Tom Grauer’s analyses are spot-on in my view in the clips above. Where I think he is mistaken is the lack of mention of boy-love”

      He’s written about Boy Love in more recent days.

      And, I agree…Due to the common nature of male sexuality…boys would be the natural primary benefactor, in a more sexually tolerant culture. As younger boys…we naturally have a much stronger need for sexual touch, sexual expression and sexual release.

      Every boy is unique…but on average…It’s the boys who are regularly thinking about having sex…and more regularly willing to seek it out, at younger ages…Not so much with the girls.

      …And, hey…I speak as someone who was seduced by a girl [while a boy, myself]…So, I know not all girls are the same, likewise.

      …But there has always been a much clearer, stronger need for liberation, within male sexuality…And I would argue, within “male to male” sexuality.

      Young females don’t normally deal with the “overpowering” sex drive, at such young ages…In fact, they are well into adulthood, by the time they reach their sexual peak…

      Males are still very young, on average, when their heaviest phase of sexuality sets in…And they can’t even legally fulfill the needs of it…which results in a lot of maladjustment…and a lot of pent up sexual aggression coming out of them.

      Reality of my own stances has nothing to do with “baby raping”…It has to do with the fact that I understand, from first hand experience, what it’s like to navigate this path…My motives are rooted in compassion, and humane human empathy.

      “Tom Grauer’s new blog…”

      Thanks for the link…I’m already subscribed, and have read that post…

      I have a hard time distinguishing exactly where he is being serious, versus where he is still trolling…And I’m unclear as to why he needed to shut down his previous, short lived blog.

      Like you…I don’t so easily share the same viewpoints as Tom…

      …Child prostitution, to my mind, is not something to be positively viewed…I would never promote it….

      …And legalization of rape?…Of course not.

  3. feinmann0

    On the topic of false accusations of sexual assault and their ‘exceeding rarity’ – according to the UK’s Crown Prosecution Service, I see that compensation in such cases is valued at between £10,000 and £60,000 by UK courts. I also see that “some years ago, the German government abolished compensation payouts for sex abuse cases except where there was corroborated evidence. The result was a drop of over 80% in the number of complaints from would be ‘victims’ … which means that there could be over 50% of UK men now convicted – who are innocent.”

    1. eqfoundation Post author

      Wish I could say I still held enough faith in society, to be shocked by such facts…

      …But, so many people just love to “win the wee wee lottery”…


Tell Us What You Think...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.