My Own Worst Enemy Podcast: #051- Interview with a Pedophile (Tom O’Carroll)…

Date: April 20, 2018

01) #051- Interview with a Pedophile (Tom O’Carroll)

“Tom O’Carroll is a self-confessed pedophile, pro-pedophilia advocate, and writer.

In today’s episode we delve in to Tom’s early life, the experience of first realizing his sexual attraction to children, his failed attempts to lead a normal life, and his pro-pedophile advocacy efforts.

We debate the nature of consent, whether or not adult-child sexual relationships are always harmful, if childhood sexual trauma is caused by the sexual acts themselves or subsequent societal judgement, and the likelihood of pro-pedophile advocacy ever resulting in a society which accepts adult-child sexual relationships.”

5 thoughts on “My Own Worst Enemy Podcast: #051- Interview with a Pedophile (Tom O’Carroll)…

  1. eqfoundation Post author

    This thing is extremely long…One thought, as I’ve forgotten most of what I was going to express…and I fell asleep [a chronic problem, as I get older], so I will need to watch this again.

    “Conservatives taking control of this discussion.”

    I don’t believe this is a “conservative versus liberal” issue…As I have experienced it…there is plenty of blame to go around…where it comes to the question of who’s chronic incompetence got us to the point, where a large portion of society has been abandoned to the trash heap of humanity…

    Both liberals and conservatives, largely of the chicken little persuasion, have driven this conversation entirely off the tracks, on their crazy train of panic and paranoia…

    The most fitting and correct people to be guiding this dialogue, are the youth, adults and children who live this experience…

    …The exact same people, who have been getting ignored and talked over, all of their lives.

    As an adult exclusive pedophile…I have far more intelligently relevant wisdom and reality to share…than any hysteric who ignorantly believes that what happened to Amber Hagerman is “the normal agenda for pedophiles”…

    To my mind…conservatives are welcome to join the dialogue, with respectful and constructive comments…

    But I’ve had my fill of the endless incompetence…and where these sorts of panicked mobs have dragged us, over the decades…No More!…They can keep their inhumane, destructive ignorance to themselves.

    …They don’t even talk about us, much less to us…if they ever honestly did in the first place.

    This is why so many of us MAPs have said to society, “To hell with you!”…and we have struck off onto our own paths, plotting forth a genuine and real dialogue, based on facts…and based on reality.

    No…conservatives may not “take over” this dialogue.

    Also…I appreciate the host acknowledging recent research…

    …However much this may horrify weak minds…the unfettered science has always been on the side of MAPs…I believe, this is exactly why research in this field has been so insanely crippled, skewed and censored over the decades…We only get “yes” men, with their revisions…We never get the hard science…

    …And it’s a sickening disgrace, in a country like the USA…where we’ve had the resources, and the willing people for decades…that the government, itself, would derail it all.

    Painfully rare pockets, where this kind of research gets out into the public…they only tend to back people like myself up…

    I am an honest person…and on this issue…I don’t care anymore, who can handle the truth…I demand the truth, regardless…The truth will be spoken…The truth will be heard.

  2. feinmann0

    Yes, this podcast was quite a marathon to listen all the way through. However, it was the first debate on the core topic that I have heard that was mutually respectful.

    As Danny said at the start, it was probably the most inarticulate performance he has ever made in any episode to date. He mentioned several times that he felt had to respond carefully on certain strands within the debate. Maybe this prevented him from being articulate, although I wonder whether a significant lack of research beforehand created problems for him. Whenever Tom quoted various relevant research statistics Danny just acquiesced. It was interesting too to hear Danny say that he had thought quite a bit about what had been discussed … in the days following the debate. It is almost as if what Tom had to say was a total revelation to the interviewer, but I guess that underlines just how successful the dominant narrative has been in brainwashing Joe Public across Anglosphere societies.

    1. eqfoundation Post author

      You have to feel a bit sorry for Danny, knowing that he has to walk a thin line with his audience…

      Effectively, I’ve only listened to a small part of this…as I kept falling asleep…I remember having a few other things I wanted to say about those portions, but not what they were.

      It’s interesting that he puts this interview forward, as being some kind of an exploration of psychology…I’m certainly not implying that’s a bad thing…It just makes me wonder what his credentials, and ultimate goals, are.

      He does not seem bad intentioned.

      Sadly…for as long as many of us have openly been out here…our views and experiences remain unheard, to virtually everyone else.

      There is no practical excuse for that…It’s largely summed up to extreme oppression and censorship…After staying the course for decades…we are finally breaking through those barriers…even existing out in the open, on some internet islands…

      It’s good to see interviews like this, and the bridges they can build.

      …I wish I was even a fraction as good at interviews, as Tom is.

    2. Anon

      In the TOC blog he (Danny) has shown his true face, an example:

      “pedophiles, who just want to have sex with them […]
      I’m sorry, but this child liberation nonsense is a non-starter for me. It’s smacks of little more than horny men clutching at disingenuous political abstractions in a lame attempt to legitimise their attempts to wrestle innocent, naive children from the protection of their parents for the sole purpose of ejaculating inside them.
      […] what terrible parents we are those of us who’d rather our children focus on activities that didn’t involve them being drenched in semen and saliva.
      […] That some of you even attempt to dress up the desire to exchange bodily fluids with minors as some sort of charitable concern for the well-being and political liberation of children in general”

      “the shallow selfish nature of their true motivations
      […] the shameful nature of their behaviour
      […] predatory motives; the pedophile exploiting situations such as family breakdown, a time when a child is most vulnerable, in order to take advantage of the situation for their own sexual ends,”

      1. eqfoundation Post author

        Thank you!

        Was this just posted in the last 24 hours, or so?…I went through the comments on Tom’s blog, but I don’t recall encountering this.

        I was thinking about posting a comment there…but wanted to wait until I’d actually listened to the whole interview.

        Frankly…I’m not shocked, as my expectations for people like that tend to be very low.

Tell Us What You Think...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.