Neuroimaging study finds intolerance of uncertainty is linked to an enlarged striatum in the brain…


Date: May 21, 2018

01) Neuroimaging study finds intolerance of uncertainty is linked to an enlarged striatum in the brain

“People who struggle with the ambiguity of the future tend to have a larger striatum, according to new neuroimaging research published in the journal Emotion.

The study found people who had difficulty tolerating an uncertain future had a greater volume of gray matter within the striatum, a brain structure that plays an important role in decisions, movements, and motivations.

“Anxiety (and its co-conspirator ‘worry’) is an active, energy consuming process,” the study’s lead author, M. Justin Kim of Dartmouth College, told PsyPost. “You haven’t given up – you are still fighting back, trying to anticipate what might happen tomorrow. The problem of course is that there are an infinite number of ‘what if…’ scenarios you can come up with. For some individuals, the uncertainty of what ‘might happen’ tomorrow, is actually worse than the negative event itself actually happening. These individuals are intolerant of uncertainty.”

“We were interested in how uncertainty and ambiguity of potential future threat contribute to the generation of anxiety and how they might be represented in our brain. In the psychology literature, how we deal with an uncertain future can be quantified as intolerance of uncertainty (IU). As is the case with any other personality characteristic, we all have varying degrees of IU. For example, individuals high in IU display difficulty accepting the possibility of potential negative events in the future. Importantly, psychiatric disorders such as generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), whose symptoms are marked with worrying/obsessing, are commonly associated elevated IU.”


4 thoughts on “Neuroimaging study finds intolerance of uncertainty is linked to an enlarged striatum in the brain…

      1. Yure

        I believe in our power of choosing and that our choices are real. That doesn’t mean “free” will, as I see that there are natural limitations to what I can and can not do. Plus, there’s also the fact that, if I’m given a set of options, then I’m limited to those options. I think that biology exercises some control, but not full control. That being said, I never take brain scans as absolute, though you don’t seem to take them as absolute either. Specially when it’s Cantor’s doing.

      2. eqfoundation Post author

        Well spoken!

        I don’t see them as being absolute destiny, either…But, I expect much of our biology has heavy influence on how we think and act.

        Of course…the conundrum in pinning down “where X exists” in the body, is whether something we value and love about ourselves could ever be taken away from us.

        From a political and religious standpoint, however…I find it fascinating that differences in the brain structure, could make people prone towards leaning in one direction over the other…Or, could be the difference between a dogmatic mind verses a contemplative mind.

Tell Us What You Think...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.