“Politician” Admits He’s A Pedophile…


Date: June 03, 2018

01) Politician Admits He’s A Pedophile


“Nathan Larson, a 37-year-old accountant from Charlottesville, Virginia, is running for Congress as an independent candidate in his native state. He is also a pedophile, as he admitted to HuffPost on Thursday, who has bragged in website posts about raping his late ex-wife.

In a phone call, Larson confirmed that he created the now-defunct websites suiped.org and incelocalypse.today ? chat rooms that served as gathering places for pedophiles and violence-minded misogynists like himself. HuffPost contacted Larson after confirming that his campaign website shared an IP address with these forums, among others. His sites were terminated by their domain host on Tuesday.

On the phone, he was open about his pedophilia and seemingly unfazed about his long odds of attaining government office.

“A lot of people are tired of political correctness and being constrained by it,” he said. “People prefer when there’s an outsider who doesn’t have anything to lose and is willing to say what’s on a lot of people’s minds.”

Citation:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nathan-larson-congressional-candidate-pedophile_us_5b10916de4b0d5e89e1e4824

First…

“Politician Admits He’s A Pedophile”

…He’s not an actual politician, is he?…He’s someone who has filed the paperwork, and declared his intent to run for a government office…correct?

Last I knew, anybody could do this in the U.S so long as they are a citizen…with possible exclusion of convicted felons.

A Few Comments:

I’m not sure what road brought him to our door step…but, “Lysander” is not a representative of pedophiles, or MAPs in general.

If you can find his numerous posts on BoyChat [I believe he’s been banned for some time, now], it wont take you long to realize he was overwhelmingly rejected by the community…and most people did not want him amongst us.

Of his websites…I’ve seen the “Suiped” [or whatever it was called…it was a combination of the words “suicide” and “pedophiles”] website…A very bizarre [and I would argue, destructive] argument, that pedophiles should have the legal right to seek medically assisted suicide, based upon the fact that they are born this way, and this should be a legal way to end mental suffering…As I recall it, this was being offered as a path to establish some sort of legally recognized “rights” for pedophiles…a warped sort of “first step”.

I never saw the other website…and I’m not aware of any communication platform that this person ran.

Not that it would matter legally, as I don’t live in his district…But as a MAP, as a pedophile, as a BoyLover, as a humanitarian and as a humanist, I could never in good conscience endorse Nathan Larson.

…Not after everything I’ve seen come out of him.

11 thoughts on ““Politician” Admits He’s A Pedophile…

  1. Yure

    I have been on Suiped and I know that Pro-Pedo Front supports that. Actually, Brongersma fought to legalize euthanasia, which is pretty much assisted suicide, and that was how he actually died in 1998. I think that every life if precious, but I can’t help it if the person has no wish to protect their own life. They would take it away in the first opportunity in a moment of desperation. So, like, that renders the illegality of suicide (yes, suicide is a crime in Brazil) something actually harmful. If I attempt to suicide and fail, I’ll be arrested, so I better not fail at it. I think it’s a pointless ban.
    I think that the first attacks against the age of consent will come from the right wing. Oddly, righties often say that lefties are responsible for normalizing pedophilia. Indeed, Salon has humanized pedophiles before, two or three times. But the attacks on age of consent as a law, I think those will come from the right wing. Even if Larson there has proposals about that, I don’t like the idea that he advocates for the legalization of rape or “benevolent white supremacy”. Don’t get me wrong: I still detest the existence of age of consent. But the poor proposals that he made outweight the possible positive side. I wouldn’t vote for him and I told my normie friends that I wouldn’t side with him, just in case of them taking Larson as representative of the entire crowd of MAPs.
    I wrote a text on how the PNVD failed in the Netherlands, but it seems like I didn’t write it fast enough, as Larson is doing everything that I advised against.

    Reply
    1. eqfoundation Post author

      “I have been on Suiped and I know that Pro-Pedo Front supports that. Actually, Brongersma fought to legalize euthanasia, which is pretty much assisted suicide, and that was how he actually died in 1998.”

      I’m aware of this, yes…

      And, for the record…if you’ve not checked out my Death with Dignity series…I’ve been a proponent of assisted suicide [also illegal here] for the terminally ill who self select it, at least a decade longer than I’ve had anything to do with sexual minority causes…and BL/GL issues, in general…It goes back to the mid eighties, for me.

      So…I certainly have no hostilities towards assisted suicide [or euthanasia], where someone terminal is suffering…or wants to avoid extreme suffering at the very end stage…

      …I am not for this, with relations to depression, or any form of mental illness…nor for people being “too different”.

      “I think that the first attacks against the age of consent will come from the right wing. Oddly, righties often say that lefties are responsible for normalizing pedophilia. Indeed, Salon has humanized pedophiles before, two or three times. But the attacks on age of consent as a law, I think those will come from the right wing. Even if Larson there has proposals about that, I don’t like the idea that he advocates for the legalization of rape or “benevolent white supremacy”.

      You know…I don’t know…

      I agree, the issue of “child brides as a culture thing”, definitely seems to belong to the right wing.

      Things are so politically screwy, it’s hard to pin groups down to any one thing…in a lot of instances.

      Rape and white supremacy?…

      …Yes…These are reasons few BLs have liked him…I know they don’t fit into my ethics anywhere, at all…Same can be said for other MAPs…probably most.

      “Don’t get me wrong: I still detest the existence of age of consent. But the poor proposals that he made outweight the possible positive side. I wouldn’t vote for him and I told my normie friends that I wouldn’t side with him, just in case of them taking Larson as representative of the entire crowd of MAPs.”

      Well…AOC is it’s own issue…and he is introducing this as part of a “platform” of terrible ideas…

      I don’t like AOC…but my fundamental principles and ethics are not up for bartering…And I would not give them up, just to abolish AOC, when we’d have to live in a world of white supremacy, or legalized rape [literal rape].

      He cannot represent MAPs, based on dangling one good idea in front of us…or, two, with the legalization of child erotica [“child porn”].

      Most of his ramblings have come off really crazy…

      …At the bare minimum…if I were to endorse a “pedophile” for government office…I need it to be someone I can take seriously, who I would not be embarrassed or mortified to admit I had endorsed.

      …They’d need to actually reflect my ethics, ideas and standards.

      “I wrote a text on how the PNVD failed in the Netherlands, but it seems like I didn’t write it fast enough, as Larson is doing everything that I advised against.”

      Ha!…

      …I don’t get the impression, that he pays much attention to what the rest of us are doing…He seems to be in his own bubble.

      …Given his history on BoyChat…He seems to mostly squabble with other MAPs, and refuses sound advice/feedback.

      I’m not convinced he’s in touch with reality, honestly…He’s probably got psychological issues…and this will either fizzle out…or be a train wreck.

      Some people have speculated, that he is a funded troll [a paid agent?], commissioned to embed himself in the MAP community, cause maximum disruption…

      …It’s not inconceivable…nor is it inconceivable, that a stunt like this could be exploited, to come back around and hurt communities like BoyChat.

      …I’m not big on throwing around the term “false flag”…

      …But, I’m not so sure this wont fit the description.

      Reply
      1. feinmann0

        “He cannot represent MAPs, based on dangling one good idea in front of us…or, two, with the legalization of child erotica [“child porn”]. Most of his ramblings have come off really crazy…”

        Surely this applies equally to Tom Grauer. The impression I get from reading TG’s blogs, for example the topic: triweeklyantifeminist.wordpress.com ‘So Far, I’ve Formulated 3 Hard Rules For Your Propaganda – But You Refuse to Listen’ is that boy-love is a perversion, whereas girl-love is normal. How can one be a MAPs champion whilst simultaneously throwing boylovers under the wheels of a bus?

      2. eqfoundation Post author

        I agree…

        …I’ve contributed a few comments, at least on his original blog…But with the understanding [Tom said so much], that the project was a stunt in over the top, provocation against extreme feminism [the odious stuff] and bigotry.

        When I saw that quote…I thought…”Oh, how cute and adorable”…”issuing orders”…

        …Tom isn’t really anybody’s leader…Maybe, of three or four people who went [played?] along…but, not on a “mass movement” scale.

        I found a few things he did, to be interesting…but after twelve years of being an almost consistent presence in the blogosphere…I’m not going to dramatically change course, abandon the very essence of what I’ve been doing all this time, and take up ragging on feminists constantly, just because some guy who came out of nowhere [that I know of] is suddenly present.

        But, again…I never took his blogs too seriously…I just added a few good comments, to infuse a bit of reality on his blog…

        …comments that got deleted, when he abruptly deleted his first blog.

        Incidentally…he also advocated for legalized rape, and ownership of females…Which I also did not take seriously, as his blog existed to provoke crazy feminists.

        His trolling campaign quickly fizzled out, it appears.

        Something like this was never going to make it, into the EQF Community Links…And there’s reasons, why I’m always slow to add new additions to this resource.

      1. Wil

        Who hasn’t been, I’ve been fighting it off for weeks now, Anthony Bourdain has always been someone I looked up to and ahead of the curve

      2. Yure

        I have never been depressed for being a MAP thing, because I lived oblivious of the stigma for twenty good years. I really think it’s the stigma that makes it happen. Look at yourself, your qualities and humanity as whole. It’s a character trait like any other, to be attracted to minors.
        I talked to Loli-chan, who used to own Pro-Pedo Front. Turns out his site also was hosted by Larson and it was also taken down when the hoster decided to pull the plug on all stuff Larson hosted. That doesn’t mean that Loli-chan and Larson are the same person, but that Larson solved the hosting issue for Loli-chan.

  2. Termite

    While I don’t agree with Nathan’s purported feelings or positions on a lot of things, I also think it may be wrong to take them entirely seriously. And separately from that, I think it’s wrong to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Nathan is a smart man, and it is precisely his ability to not just think outside the box, but tear the box down, that may lead the way forward. Logical reasoning and evidence have not been enough to make progress within the system. Emotional appeals are dismissed. The best way forward may be to undermine some pillar of the system first. And in this, there will be allies. The system is quite broken for a lot of people.

    Reply
    1. eqfoundation Post author

      Thank you…

      …I feel like I should do more, than just thank you for your thoughts…but, I don’t have an enormous amount left to say…

      Of course…he may be fibbing a lot of his stances…

      …Do you think he’s trying to invalidate [or expose how invalid] the “election” process is?

      Of course…he has to know his campaign is doomed…

      At most, I’m curious to see how many votes he gets, if he does not drop out before election day.

      …Thing is…unless it was all setting the stage [aka creating a history]…then his long history on BoyChat isn’t well explained.

      Reply
    2. Yure

      I like the “undermine system pillars” part. One of my friends, who isn’t a MAP, told me that I was supposed to show my stuff to the judiciary power. Some people here who are caught in relationships with minors are declared innocent if their defense argues well. So, I decided to tend to that advice and see if I can use the laws of my country to provide arguments for use in trial. I mean, what is the point if the law can not convict? Sure, the best thing to do would be refrain from doing it, but, in case of you being already doomed to trial, it’s not illegal to offer means of defense.

      Reply

Tell Us What You Think...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.