Daily Archives: July 9, 2018

Seth Rogan Calls Out Twitter CEO…

Date: July 09, 2018

01) Seth Rogan Calls Out Twitter CEO

“The tweet kinda speaks for itself, but just in case you can’t see the embed (or if it gets deleted), here it is in plain text:

I’ve been DMing with @jack about his bizarre need to verify white supremacists on his platform for the last 8 months or so, and after all the exchanges, I’ve reached a conclusion: the dude simply does not seem to give a fuck.

Apparently, Rogen had a direct line to the head of Twitter for the past 8 months to chat about Twitter’s hate problem. Wow, to say the least.

Mind you, it’s not like Twitter is doing nothing about its toxicity problem — in December, it started banning notable white nationalist and nazi groups, and the company’s currently fighting in court to keep them banned.

But Twitter is also facing pressure from the right, claiming that the social network is trying to suppress conservative viewpoints — reportedly, Dorsey has been holding secret dinners with conservative leaders who believe the tech industry is biased.


Twitter likely doesn’t want to get into the nightmare business, of splitting hairs over who “deserves” to have a verification check mark…

…It’s just another thing, for huge segments of their userbase to endlessly nag them over.

In addition…I don’t see this as being even remotely useful…It’s more less SJW level attacking…Who cares if they have a check mark or not?…Does it alter their ability to do what they are doing, on Twitter?…Most people can verify themselves, by using other websites…linking them with their Twitter account, and referencing both on each other.

Twitter identity verification, is not an endorsement from Twitter…It’s a simple verification, that people are who they say they are…Where did people lose sight of this point of fact?…And why are people trying to pretend that this new “state of endorsement” exists, being made up out of nowhere, by themselves?

It should go without saying, after all these years…I have no affinity with white supremacist, or otherwise racist, life philosophies…I just think this whole story is way out there…and pretty outlandish…petty, even…

…And it’s a further encroachment, of SJW tactical aggression…anything to get in another jab, at anyone they don’t like…no matter how senseless.

About the Verification Check Mark:

I’ve always thought it ridiculous that it’s there…but it’s not available to the overwhelming majority of us…As if nobody else but celebrities, politicians, etc., need it.

Workers’ Rights & Richard Wolff…

Date: July 09, 2018

01) Workers’ Rights & Richard Wolff

“Jesse Ventura and Brigida Santos discuss the erosion of workers’ rights in America and how our debt-based economy leads to greater inequality. Professor Richard Wolff talks about his book, “Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism,” and how employment cooperatives may improve the economy.”

FBI Statistics Say Reverse Racism is Real – And It’s Just Called Racism…

Date: July 09, 2018

01) FBI Statistics Say Reverse Racism is Real – And It’s Just Called Racism

“Can anyone be racist? Is reverse racism real? Does anti-white racism exist? Statistics by the FBI and every scientific study says yes. Here’s why







Illegal Sex Advertising or Free Speech. A FOSTA Lawsuit…

Date: July 09, 2018

01) Illegal Sex Advertising or Free Speech. A FOSTA Lawsuit…

“Late last year, Congress passed FOSTA, a law designed to fight the exploitation of children and sex trafficking. At the time, we knew that FOSTA will be challenged in court. The Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act was designed to fight online ads for escorts shown on backpage and craigslist. But FOSTA is less about illegal sex and more about free speech. FOSTA is less about protecting children and more about censorship. Is FOSTA well designed to further the government goals of preventing victims of human traffickers? Is FOSTA narrowly tailored to avoid designating as illegal acts that are perfectly legal? Let’s talk. FOSTA is in fact a free speech issue. There are several reasons why FOSTA may be unconstitutional.”