‘Nick’ unmasked: Man whose ‘fake’ claims of VIP abuse sparked £2.5m police probe is named and pictured for the first time…

About This Series

Date: December 07, 2018

01) ‘Nick’ unmasked: Man whose ‘fake’ claims of VIP abuse sparked £2.5m police probe is named and pictured for the first time

Thanks to feinmann0!

“‘Nick’ unmasked: man whose ‘fake’ claims of VIP abuse sparked £2.5m police probe is named and pictured for the first time. For four years the press has been barred from disclosing real name of Carl Beech, but his identity was revealed yesterday after a judge lifted the reporting restriction. His allegations sparked the the £2.5million Westminster VIP paedophile probe.

He had previously accused former Conservative prime minister Edward Heath, Tory ex-home secretary Leon Brittan and the former head of the armed forces, Field Marshal Lord Bramall, of being part of a VIP child sex ring.

He also claimed some of the men, including ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor, were involved in the murders of three boys. Since 2014, when he first went public with his allegations of VIP child sex abuse and murder, he had only been known by the pseudonym ‘Nick’.”

Not only should Beech be facing trial, but the Crown Prosecution Service and the law enforcement agencies upholding the credibility and truth of Beech’s story, should be too.

This is what Lord Bramall and his wife were subjected to as part of Operation Midland back in 2015 … thanks to Beech:

It will be interesting to see what happens with Carl…He needs to face severe consequences for these heinous actions.

I’ve been a critic of these accusations, since shortly after they surfaced…They never struck me as credible…

…A good rule of thumb…if the assertions are extreme, hyperbolic and improbable…then they require scrutiny, most of all.

…Good Gwad…all the people who were jumping onto this bandwagon, willy nilly…because they had a pre-existing notion that “satanic pedophile sex cults prominently exist”…It was insane, the stuff I was trudging through on Twitter…

…Some of the bozos who were targeting this very blog, were deep into this conspiracy theory…and talking about it, as though they had first hand knowledge…and knew it to be established fact…

…These were people looking for anything, to “validate” their existing beliefs…

…And many of them are so badly off their rocker…that attempting to infuse a bit of level headed common sense into the dialogue, would get you targeted and branded as “part of the satanic pedophile ring”…or some similar idiotic nonsense…

So…here we are…years later…the “witnesses” have been exposed as complete frauds [at no surprise to those of us, who’ve seen similar cases rise and collapse over the decades]…It’s all crumbled down to a bunch of idiots…a few who maliciously lie and smear…and a bunch of idiots who cannot competently vet out an [in my opinion] obviously ludicrous story of fiction…and a whole slew of idiots, who spread and talk about these lies and failures of “the justice system”, as if some actual “satanic pedophile sex cult” was being uncovered and revealed…dragging innocent people through the mud, all along the way…

…To these idiots I say…take a bow…

…You’ve just performed the very exact reasons, why I stay [and tell people to stay] reserved, where it comes to making any conclusions about these sorts of public accusations [and resulting investigations]…

People like Carl, who maliciously lie their asses off for any number of reasons [including financial gain], are a far, far more common occurrence in these cases, than most people even understand.

I never bring this fact up to get in digs at CSA victims…It’s cold, hard reality…of which I demand to see curtailed…Which is why I stand up in opposition to it.

I wonder how many of the people pushing this false scandal, are still holding onto the notion that it is real?…

Speaking as someone who has taken the harder, critical stance on this…I can tell you, that I’m not right about everything…but generally, when my gut instinct kicks in, I’m pretty accurate in judging these things…

Blind faith in the claims of nameless, faceless accusers with fantastical claims, will never replace being informed, having common sense…and having a strong intuition.

This case stunk of incredulity, right from the start…

…What I find alarming…is how this escaped so many people…And how those people so quickly flowed right into the story, without any critical resistance.


4 thoughts on “‘Nick’ unmasked: Man whose ‘fake’ claims of VIP abuse sparked £2.5m police probe is named and pictured for the first time…

  1. feinmann0

    “So…here we are…years later…the “witnesses” have been exposed as complete frauds …”

    Nick really was incredibly lucky to choose the right time to spin his fraudulent yarns. Society, the media, law enforcement were all riding on the top of a tsunami of child sexual abuse hysteria, and milking it for all it was worth. Nick’s story came out in 2014, and millions of taxpayers pounds were spent investigating his claims, arresting the ‘molesters’ and ruining their lives whilst the investigation plodded its way to a fruitless conclusion.

    The tsunami appeared back in 2011 when the disk jockey Jimmy Savile died. The epicentre of the earthquake that created the tsunami was Duncroft Approved School near London Heathrow, an experimental secure boarding school near London Heathrow, opened by the Home Office to give a second chance of education to girls of above-average intelligence taken into care after breaking the law. Several former pupils claimed Jimmy Savile abused girls there in the 1960s: “Jimmy treated Duncroft like a paedophile sweet shop. He used to take his pick of the mix. He would wander around the school in a vest and tracksuit bottoms. . . He stayed in a flat on the top floor . . . Who knows what horrors happened up there.”

    However, evidence shows that the first time Savile ever visited Duncroft was in 1974.

    “In the ten weeks between October and December 2012, 450 people contacted the police to complain they had been sexually abused by Jimmy Savile. By January 2013, a joint police and NSPCC review, ‘Giving Victims a Voice’, suggested that in 54 years Savile had attacked 28 children under ten years old and 63 girls between 13 and 16. The dead disc jockey was being
    accused of 214 offences, including 34 rapes in 28 different police areas.”

    The full story by Andrew Rosthorn which includes some of the facts above, can be read here: lobster-magazine.co.uk/free/lobster75/lob75-anna-raccoon.pdf The title is: “Jimmy Savile ‘moral panic’ tracked on computer in Dordogne”

    This is an important piece by Rosthorn, and National Newspapers will be missing a trick if they ignore this huge story. Now Nick has been named, the tsunami has altered course with hundreds of false accusers in its sights. Hopefully it will eradicate the compensation culture too and stop law enforcement believing the ‘victim’ in the absence of any evidence.

    1. eqfoundation Post author

      Yeah…all these many “victims”, and not a single one of them had the will to come forward…until after Jimmy died?!…

      Even if I could buy into the idea, that a dozen or so individuals might stay quiet [however unlikely it would be, for the totality of them]…450?!!!…Are you kidding me?!

      This raises major red flags, to anyone who is not a brain dead idiot.

      Not even Michael Jackson could escape the allegations…and his list of boyfriends was what?…a dozen or so?…maybe less?


Tell Us What You Think...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.