Date: February 25, 2019
Thanks to feinmann0!
“An excellent attempt at highlighting the injustices suffered by hetereosexual men whenever they are discovered by a gynocentrist society to be ‘perving’ at (also known as being attracted to), and thus implicitly a danger to underage females.
However, there are few words in this ~10,000 word essay about attraction to underage males.
“Male Sexualism is men’s single authentic resistance movement. We resist the Puritan-Feminist onslaught against our sexuality and against our very being. We
resist the criminalization of normal, healthy, heterosexual male sexuality. We resist the rule of low-testosterone, effete degenerates who hate their own masculinity over virile men. We resist the rule of Female Supremacists who consider the female sense of comfort to be civilization’s supreme and ultimate value. And we resist the fear-mongering campaigns conducted by cynical, Machiavellian, despotic agents of the state who wish nothing less than to usher in our total subjugation to their Puritan-Feminist tyranny.
Male Sexualism is not actually a ‘pedophile movement’, whatever that even means. Actual pedophilia, i.e. attraction to prepubescents, is both rare and overwhelmingly homosexual. That’s not the banner representing our worldview, although we may find some allies among that crowd, if they will see us as their allies, which is rather doubtful.
(Obviously, if ‘pedophilia’ means ‘attraction to teenagers who exhibit signs of fertility,’ then every single heterosexual man with healthy testosterone levels is a
‘pedophile,’ and in that case, we are indeed a ‘pedophile movement’)”
I suggest that Grauer makes two fundamental mistakes here. First, paedophilia is not rare … if it was, there would be far fewer individuals on sex offender registers. It is rather like the government ingenuously claiming false accusations are rare, when in fact they are numerous. Second, prepubescent girl lovers outnumber prepubescent boy lovers by at least 10 to 1 (roughly equivalent to the ratio between heterosexual men and homosexual men).
Why does Grauer make such glaring mistakes? In my opinion boy-love is an inconvenient truth that is conveniently discarded to present a simplifed Male Sexualist formula. By doing this, Grauer advertently discriminates against those of us males who happen to be naturally sexually attracted to boys.”
I agree…”Pedophilia” [including the actual orientation, itself] is nowhere near as rare, as most people presume.
…An personal opinion, yes…but an educated, informed and rationally intuitive opinion.
I also agree, that BoyLove is a form of male sexualism….
…In fact, it’s such a pure form of male sexualism…that it omits the females…and it’s all about male sexuality.