Woman, 22, who had ‘sexual contact’ three times with a boy, 14, who she met on the internet avoids jail after judge says ‘there was genuine affection’ between the pair…


Date: September 25, 2020

Thanks to Yure!

01) Woman, 22, who had ‘sexual contact’ three times with a boy, 14, who she met on the internet avoids jail after judge says ‘there was genuine affection’ between the pair

“A woman who had sexual contact with a 14-year-old boy she met online has been spared prison.

Sophie Johnson engaged in sexual activity with the schoolboy on three occasions within the space of a few days, a court heard.

Newcastle Crown Court heard she had ignored warnings about his age and failed to take steps to ensure he was over 16.

However, once she realised how young he was, she stopped what was happening between them.

The court heard Johnson, 22, who is immature for her age, began communicating with the boy online and they swapped messages before meeting.

The boy did not provide a victim impact statement and while he cooperated with the prosecution, he did not wish to provide any further information, the court heard.

Johnson, of Elswick, Newcastle, who has no previous convictions, pleaded guilty to five counts of sexual activity with a child and was sentenced to a three year community order and must sign the sex offenders register for five years.

Setencing her, Judge Sarah Mallett said: ‘This was a relationship of mutual affection, there was no pressure applied or grooming of any sort.”

===

4 thoughts on “Woman, 22, who had ‘sexual contact’ three times with a boy, 14, who she met on the internet avoids jail after judge says ‘there was genuine affection’ between the pair…

  1. feinmann

    Contrast the outcome if the 22-year-od was a man and the 14-year-old was a girl. The man would have been sent to prison for a very long time.

    Eivind Berge summarises well: “Imagine being so emotionally crippled that you think so much of the sexuality that healthy humans appreciate is just rape and abuse. We should pity them, in addition to doing everything we can to oppose them, of course. The antisex bigots (of this variety that construct ‘victims” everywhere) are suffering from psychopathy on steroids.”

    Reply
    1. eqfoundation Post author

      Of course, I agree…and further offer some thoughts I responded with, to Marty Weiss on Twitter…

      Seeing the look in her eyes…

      …those soulless monsters are putting this woman through psychological hell…just as they’ve done to countless…and over what?…

      …So they can grind up another human being, to reinforce “their ownership” of everybody else’s genitals?

      It is double standards, yes…but there is yet so much more to pick up on, in this story.

      If we can find any “bright” point in this, I think it’s that someone acknowledged there were benevolent feelings, and it was not malicious.

      It’s at least some sort of step towards reality

      Reply
  2. Yure

    Ay, I got featured again! A great way to finish the day. Thanks, Stevie. I also thought the same thing that Feinmann thought: imagine if it was a man and a girl. It would be unforgivable. I read somewhere that it happens because there’s a belief that male sexuality is predatory. If there’s a man in the relationship and something went wrong, love is ruled out.

    Reply

Tell Us What You Think...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.