Date: December 26, 2019
“Some amusing video that was once uploaded on YouTube.”
So, he was abusive to MAPs on Twitter, got his account terminated, and this is his melt down over it?
This guy is unhinged.
I ask you sincerely, who deserves these words of vulgar abuse and hate, merely for daring to live, love and be loved?…
Have no doubt, that Child Love and Teen Love are a pure form of love…genuine and worthy of defense, no matter what some may say about it…
| THE WALL |
Date: November 29, 2019
“Radio host, Carrie Abbott (http://CarrieAbbott.com) and
A heavy conversation, but so important, if we are to learn how to protect kids & support survivors.”
We fight, because people like this are free to slander and libel us at will, without consequence, and even in the pursuit of personal, monetary gain.
This “interview” is a doozy.
You can follow the link to his Twitter account, take a look around, and come to your own conclusions about the extremity of his dehumanizing behavior.
He has a “business” which offers “professional advice” to churches, to “get/keep sexual predators out”. He produces and releases a seemingly endless stream of fear mongering, and libelous smearing against MAPs.
…all while exhibiting no actual understanding of MAPs, MAP issues or the MAP movement.
He appears to be a typical, abusive, exploitative bigot.
Hamburger Veermaster unpacks and critiques a typical Jon K Uhler rant.
…and gives a bit of background on Jon.
Do you feel right about having someone like Jon out there, spreading this type of dehumanizing propaganda?…If you are a MAP, are you okay with people like this, doing these things at your expense, and for a predatory personal profit?
|About This Series|
Date: November 25, 2019
“Sacha Baron Cohen is the well-deserved recipient of ADL’s International Leadership Award, which goes to exceptional individuals who combine professional success with a profound personal commitment to community involvement and to crossing borders and barriers with a message of diversity and equal opportunity.
Over 100 years ago Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote: “Sunlight is said to be the best disinfectant.” Through his alter egos, many of whom represent anti-Semites, racists and neo-Nazis, Baron Cohen shines a piercing light on people’s ignorance and biases.
“First, Zuckerberg tried to portray this whole issue as “choices…around free expression.” That is ludicrous. This is not about limiting anyone’s free speech. This is about giving people, including some of the most reprehensible people on earth, the biggest platform in history to reach a third of the planet. Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach. Sadly, there will always be racists, misogynists, anti-Semites and child abusers. But I think we could all agree that we should not be giving bigots and pedophiles a free platform to amplify their views and target their victims.
Second, Zuckerberg claimed that new limits on what’s posted on social media would be to “pull back on free expression.” This is utter nonsense. The First Amendment says that “Congress shall make no law” abridging freedom of speech, however, this does not apply to private businesses like Facebook. We’re not asking these companies to determine the boundaries of free speech across society. We just want them to be responsible on their platforms.
In every other industry, you can be sued for the harm you cause. Publishers can be sued for libel, people can be sued for defamation. I’ve been sued many times! I’m being sued right now by someone whose name I won’t mention because he might sue me again! But social media companies are largely protected from liability for the content their users post—no matter how indecent it is—by Section 230 of, get ready for it, the Communications Decency Act. Absurd!
Fortunately, Internet companies can now be held responsible for pedophiles who use their sites to target children. I say, let’s also hold these companies responsible for those who use their sites to advocate for the mass murder of children because of their race or religion. And maybe fines are not enough. Maybe it’s time to tell Mark Zuckerberg and the CEOs of these companies: you already allowed one foreign power to interfere in our elections, you already facilitated one genocide in Myanmar, do it again and you go to jail.”
I’d like to point out here, that the U.S. government passing laws, which demand the fine or incarceration of business owners who let controversial people use their services is, necessarily, a violation of the first amendment!…
How on earth is this glaring, obvious point lost on Sacha?
The whole point of the amendment, is that the U.S. government is forbidden from interfering in free speech, be it in the political system or in the private sector.
You cannot claim that the government forcing a non government business to impose censorship upon it’s user base, is somehow not a violation of the first amendment. It absolutely is…and clearly so.
Nothing honestly surprises me, anymore…but I am sad to see such an expression coming out of him.
He’s targeting Facebook.
People who say this about Facebook, are almost universally ignorant of the “on the ground” realities, of being a “pedophile” trying to use Facebook’s services.
Facebook rolls over like nothing, and virtually never defends any form of speech, coming from self identified “pedophiles” [or supporters], not even when that speech is perfectly legal, honest, fair and ethical.
The historical pattern of behavior is as follows…
…anyone reports…automatic deletion…report, delete…report, delete…
This all happens out in the open…and yet, incredulously, there are endless waves of people who act oblivious towards it.
Facebook has only been draconian against open “pedophiles”…which is why it is so reviled, by many in the MAP community.
Of course, you can have and use a FB account, being a “pedophile”, and you’ll probably be left alone so long as you don’t outwardly identify as such, or talk “too much” about unapproved topics.
But, FB is a platform for speech and thought police.
Date: October 15, 2019
“Today, at 12:55 in the afternoon at the Liverpool Civil and Family Courts, Esther Baker was made bankrupt as a result of her crumbling libel claim against John Hemming and her failure to pay the costs order. At this point, most mentally healthy people would think again about supporting her. Two notable exceptions to common sense however are “Dr” Jacqui Dillon and Rotherham Councillor Jayne Senior. Despite Hemming now having won two libel claims against significant opposition – a former Guardian journalist and a charity CEO – these two women continue to refer to Baker’s allegations on Twitter.”
We fight back, because of slanderers and charlatans…
…And when we do fight back, we tend to win.
October 02, 2019
Thanks to feinmann0!
“A report found 415 complaints under ‘abuse of position for sexual purposes’
Suspects, victims of crime, children and witnesses are among those exploited
Comes after rapist Ian Naude preyed on his 13-year-old victim while a police constable in Cheshire
Hundreds of police officers have been accused of exploiting crime victims for sex by pretending to be ‘knights in shining armour.’
A total of 415 allegations have been made against officers for ‘abusing their position for a sexual purpose’ in three years, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary said.
Suspects, victims of crime, children, witnesses and vulnerable people are some of those who were exploited.
COMMENT from SUBMITTER:
When a country creates an unaccountable police state, as it clearly has in the UK, there is no limit to their criminality. The topic above is just one tip of a huge iceberg being uncovered. A second, larger chunk, is the police-enabled false allegations industry. The Daily Mail appears to be the only newspaper making some sort of effort to do the uncovering.”
What is the best way for an actual predator to evade the law?…
…It’s to become the exact person, responsible for enforcing the law in their area.
They can always fail to open an investigation on themselves.
If nothing happens at the early levels…nothing ultimately happens.
I’ve mentioned this a few times over the years, and it recurrently shows to be true…
…there are strong parallels between the mind of a criminal, and the mind of a cop…particularly the authoritarian type of cop.
They are both social bullies…and often a criminal could have become a cop, or a cop could have become a criminal.
This is a well established point of fact.
Yes…of course…”not all cops”…
But it’s still something social science has made clear.
“A Tragic Suicide
Sixteen-year-old Cory Walgren committed suicide on January 11, 2017.
Cory committed a crime for which he faced the possibility of being punished by consequences that he believed were worse than death. At 16 years of age Cory was faced with the possibility of joining the ranks of the most hated social pariah in our society and facing a lifetime of never being accepted as a normal citizen with the respect and rights that ought to be a part of citizenship. It was not irrational to think that this might be a fate worse than death.
Most liberal-minded people would probably feel that making a video of his sexual activities with his girlfriend was poor judgment, but it was hardly a heinous crime. Few would think that a virtual death penalty would be an appropriate consequence for either his sexual activities or his making a video of them.”
Date: September 27, 2019
From earlier today:
“Earlier this month, we told you about a growing scam: people pretend to be from the Social Security Administration (SSA) and try to get your Social Security number or your money. That scam is now growing exponentially. To compare: in 2017, we heard from 3,200 people about SSA imposter scams, and those people reported losing nearly $210,000. So far THIS year: more than 35,000 people have reported the scam, and they tell us they’ve lost $10 million.
Scammers are saying your Social Security number (SSN) has been suspended because of suspicious activity, or because it’s been involved in a crime. Sometimes, the scammer wants you to confirm your SSN to reactivate it. Sometimes, he’ll say your bank account is about to be seized – but he’ll tell you what to do to keep it safe. (Often, that involves putting your money on gift cards and giving him the codes – which, of course, means that your money is gone.)
Oh, and your caller ID often shows the real SSA phone number (1-800-772-1213) when these scammers call – but they’re faking that number. It’s not the real SSA calling.
Here’s what to know:
Your Social Security number is not about to be suspended. You don’t have to verify your number to anyone who calls out of the blue. And your bank accounts are not about to be seized.
SSA will never call to threaten your benefits or tell you to wire money, send cash, or put money on gift cards. Anyone who tells you to do those things is a scammer. Every time.
The real SSA number is 1-800-772-1213, but scammers are putting that number in the caller ID. If you’re worried about what the caller says, hang up and call 1-800-772-1213 to speak to the real SSA. Even if the wait time is long, confirm with the real SSA before responding to one of these calls.
Never give any part of your Social Security number to anyone who contacts you. Or your bank account or credit card number.
If you get one of these calls, tell the FTC at https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov/#crnt&panel1-1.”
“Social security robocalls are a frightening type of scam. You receive a robocall, and suddenly, an angry person on the other end is threatening you. It’s the Social Security Administration, and they need you to provide some personal information because their computers are down. Or — you were overpaid and you need to pay it back immediately. Or — your check isn’t coming until you give some information to the caller. These are all scams! These scams have successfully extracted millions of dollars from Americans. Social security scams are especially dangerous to seniors and people on disability. Many of these folks are entirely dependent on their SSA income, so it causes great panic to hear they won’t get their check as expected. This panic unfortunately leads to making payments or providing information to scammers. Remember — the SSA doesn’t call people to request money — end of story. Any call you receive from the SSA requesting money or personal information is guaranteed to be a scam. The SSA, like most US government agencies, prefers to communicate by written mail.”
I don’t usually go out of my way to do this…but, they decided they wanted to target me, today…so…
Anytime you get a wonky telephone call, where someone is threatening to sue/arrest you, or seize/suspend something of yours…always take the callback number they give you, enter it into any search engine you like…and see what results you get.
I’ve received these types of calls a number of times, over the last several years.
…In fact, I’m rather sick of these a-holes…which is why I’m going to punch back at them…by raising awareness.
|About This Series|
Date: August 07, 2019
“A Montana man allegedly assaulted a 13-year-old boy who he believed had disrespected the American national anthem at a county fair in the state. Curt James Brockway, 39, of Superior, is accused of assaulting the boy at the Mineral County Fair and Rodeo at around 11 p.m. on Saturday.
“There was a little boy lying on the ground,” Taylor Hennick, who was [at] the rodeo, told Missoulian. “He was bleeding out of his ears, seizing on the ground, just not coherent.”
According to KPAX, witnesses saw a man pick up a boy and throw him to the ground. Brockway reportedly tried to justify his actions to nearby fairgoers. Hennick told Missoulian: “He said [the boy] was disrespecting the national anthem so he had every right to do that.”
The unnamed boy’s parents said his ears bled for six hours after the incident and that his skull was fractured. He was taken by air ambulance to Sacred Heart Children’s Hospital in Spokane.
Brockway, who has a previous assault with a weapon charge from 2011, and who Missoulian reported is a registered violent offender, will be released on his own recognizance Tuesday.”
Jesus…all the things wrong with this…
Who in the hell does this?
It’s people like this, who belong locked up for a very long time. He [allegedly] inflicted grave bodily injury on a thirteen year old…with intentional, brutal violence.
This guy inexplicably will walk free “released on his own recognizance”.
If the crime had been performing highly appreciated oral sex on this same boy…the accused would have likely never been released at all.