Date: March 19, 2020
Date: February 24, 2020
“THE sadistic mother and stepfather who made their son kneel on a pile of buckwheat – causing it to grow into his skin – have been jailed.
They forced their son to kneel on buckwheat crops for nine hours at a time as part of a cruel punishment.
The boys knees were bloodied from where he was forced to kneel on the sharp kernels for up to nine hours at a time.
His dad can be seen kicking him in this video released to the court.
The boy’s dad, 35-year-old Sergey Kazakov, and mom, 27-year-old Alina Yumasheva, carried out the painful punishment on their son for 10 days in a row, according to a court in Omsk, Russia.
Kazakov and Yumasheva were found guilty of “inflicting physical and psychological suffering” to their son, Denis, through “systematic beatings and other violent actions,” Metro UK reported.
The boy, who possibly faces adoption as he has been placed into an orphanage, needed the buckwheat roots to be surgically removed from his knees after they began growing in his skin.
His torture only ended when he fled the family home and pleaded with a neighbor to help, showing his horrendous wounds.
Yumasheva claimed she and Kazakov found this form of punishment on the internet and inflicted it on the child after he was late home from school and playing outside.
The couple of also starved the boy for up to four days at a time, claim state investigators.”
…and they sent this boy back to live with his mother, presumably in the same house this all took place in.
He pleaded for this not to happen.
ARCHIVE | THE WALL
|About This Series|
Date: January 25, 2020
A Mercy Editing:
At the request of Yure, I have reconsidered.
As circumstances have turned into a hardship for [T-G], I have decided to change the titles and URLs of all posts including his actual name…This does not mean every instance of his full name has been removed from this blog.
MAPs do have a general right to know about [T-G]’s comments…and I am not going to be editing the comments of other MAPs, in regards to this.
I still see this chore as being futile, given the ways [T-G] has already put himself out there [including on video]…It’s primarily a gesture of mercy.
[T-G] has taken it upon himself to suggest that he can get Our Love Frontier taken down, and has expressed an intention to make such an attempt, if I do not “bend the knee” and relent to his sudden demand that I remove reference to him from this blog…a whole two posts, published November 10, 2018 [not it’s original published date] and October 15, 2018, discussing a sort of summit between MAPs, male sexualists and incels [and the aftermath of that summit], hosted by [T-G] on his blog.
[T-G] is free to leave whatever activism he has submerged himself into, in the past.
He is not free, however, to dictate to others whether they can post their own content, post quotations under fair use, or keep accurate historical documentations of events on their website/blog.
I initially offered to redact [T-G]’s name, but here is the issue…
…There is a domino effect, if I am actually going to remove [T-G]’s name in any meaningful way. It makes no sense for me to bother removing his name in text, when the audio file still speaks his name…Depending whether I’ve saved certain files associated with this [I usually do not], this can easily turn into something akin to an afternoon project…and not the “45 seconds”, [T-G] presumes will be involved…because I’ll have to remake the audio file, on top of everything else.
It’s ridiculous for me to bother removing his name in text, when his name is still going to be present.
It is also ridiculous for me to bother removing/editing a whole two posts [out of the 6355 other posts published here], just because they name [T-G]…when there are any number of other blogs and websites which mention [T-G], and can be quickly found by a google search for “[their name]”…some of them very uncharitable to [T-G], particularly in comparison to what I have published here [which is down right kind, and at worst indifferent]. Seriously…if someone wants to look into [T-G]’s past, they’re going to find it…and it would be better to stumble upon it, when at least presented by someone who is not publishing a hatchet piece on [T-G].
In addition, as feinmann0 points out…there is an integrity issue, and MAPs do have a right to know what [T-G], a guy who once attempted to form some type of alliance with us, says thinks and does in the aftermath.
[T-G] is not going to gut the substance out of that post, by trying to strong arm me into censoring the point that it was about himself.
I no longer do a whole lot of writing about MAP issues myself, either [not for the past few years]…which is among the reasons I can get really ornery, when people try to push me into taking something down or censoring it…I wont likely ever write anything to replace it, at this point in my life…So, if I created it and decided it’s worthy and I want it published…then I want it published, and available.
If I’ve made any factual errors, I am happy enough to correct them…But I don’t need some outsider deciding that he/she can self appoint themselves, as my editor…or remove things from this blog, which they deem inconvenient to themselves.
To put things into perspective…
There are well over six thousand posts published on this blog…The number of individual people I have named, quoted and discussed on this blog, is probably somewhere between three thousand and five thousand…maybe even far more.
In the seven years I have been on WordPress, plus the two years on blog com, plus the one year I was on BayWords…Our Love Frontier has garnered only one noteworthy outburst, from someone who I was actually being very generous towards.
Nothing I have ever done on this blog, has ever been posted out of bad intent…It has always come out of a spirit of constructiveness, and education.
Sure…a lot of drive by threats have been thrown about…and a few crazies with large followings, have also waged loud campaigns to get Our Love Frontier taken down…
…But, ultimately…what I do here on this blog, is perfectly in line with what anybody else does with a blog…I’m just doing it from the perspective, of a homosexual pedophile.
So…I suppose [T-G] can complain to WordPress…He can try to invent some type of “infraction” I’m allegedly committing against the TOS…But, fact is…Wordpress has not found my activities here to be a problem, for the last seven years…and there have been people complaining all along.
…Your threat is impotent…and I am not intimidated in the least…I have no concern about being removed, over “the sin” of having published your name, along with thousands of other names…when it was done in full compliance, with respectable social standards, and for the purpose of discussing issues of relevance to the MAP community.
Go cry to WordPress…file your frivolous complaint…
…And let this post serve as notice to all of my audience, that this is how you roll…and even though it is not going to happen, if Our Love Frontier did get suspended, it is you have made this threat…and you are among the people, who would have chosen to actively do this to a long standing MAP activist, and a relevant resource in the MAP community.
For me…unless I die…I am going to still be here, posting things a year from now…maybe even ten years from now…on this very same blog.
Get over yourself, [T-G].
– Steve Diamond
“It’s Tom. Can you please remove this page, and also this: https://ourlovefrontier.wordpress.com/2018/11/10/orphaned-comment-i-left-on-a-blog-of-t-g/ one? I’ve completely dropped out of activism and don’t want to be associated with any of this anymore…”
No, I will not.
It takes me some time and effort, not only to compose these, but also to encode my posts into audio recordings.
I posted them here, because there is something relevant in them…I’ve included them [one explicitly] in my “In Self Defense” project. They are my writings, historical at this point.
I was addressing you [and your content], through the name you publicly chose to be known and addressed by.
I am not deleting or re-doing my posts.
At most, I might redact your name from the printed version of these, when I get the time and inclination to do such…but don’t count on this, as it will likely mess up the URLs to these posts, also…so, I’ll have to change the ISD Index, and track down the local copies on my HD, to change those…and, no…I don’t jump through hoops for people, where it comes to this sort of thing.
It’s a very bad precedent to set. What appears here is not going to be subject to the whims of others. I will not be accepting requests, for the deletion of my own writings, nor fair use quotations.
This is one of the main reasons why those of us who’ve been out here for years use pseudonyms, and not our legal names.
You are really annoying the hell out of me, here.
“If you set yourself up as a leader, even a here-today gone-tomorrow one, you take on the responsibility of being immortalised by history. If you are a leader who discriminates against others on the basis of their sexuality, you should always be remembered for what you are.
Leopards never changes their spots.”
Thank you for this.
Deleting these posts was never on the table, but after contemplating this for a few days, I have decided to make no changes to them at all.
These are unique pieces of writing…and I put some effort into them, most especially the orphaned response…which I officially included in my ISD project, and even made a narration audio file for…It took real time and work to create that post.
I made the decision to intentionally include that post, because it addresses a rare situation [an outside “activist”, approaching MAPs in hopes of an alliance, and inclusion]…and I’ve literally never written anything like this before. It’s an extremely unique piece of writing of mine. It belongs in the collection.
[T-G] has nothing to say, over whether I publish this or not.
I also have a right to document and comment on the aftermath.
It takes an incredible amount of gall, to approach someone and suggest deleting their own content, on their own blog…and most egregiously, when it’s part of their literal life’s work.
I’ve always approached this guy with sincerity and good will…I don’t appreciate being slapped in the face, like that.
Yes…I did a google search…Yes…this post does show up on the first page of results…about five or six down from the top.
[T-G] probably does not like that.
I don’t know what to say…There are others who still mention him on their blogs…There are websites hostile to him, which also mention him by name…
If I bother making any changes, it’s not going to make much difference…The hostile people already have what they want on him…It’s already out there.
It’s just going to be a pain in the arse for me, and several hours of work [because I’d have to redo the audio file, as well], for ultimately no good reason.
“1. I did not set myself as a leader; others did.
2. I never discriminated against anyone; I was never in a position to discriminate.
3. Even people you disagree with should not be defamed.
If you don’t want to delete the entire posts, you can simply edit their titles, which serves my purposes almost as well. It should take no more than 45 seconds at most; not hours, not even minutes.
I request this one more time; however, if you refuse to edit your posts and redact my name, the next steps to be taken will quite likely result in the removal of your site from WordPress, as has happened lately to a number of similar WordPress sites. You don’t want that to happen (presumably), and neither do I. So please consider taking a few seconds to redact my name.
Best of luck.”
No…it is not “a few seconds”…it’s tracking down and editing a number of things, and changing not only these posts, but also my ISD index…and all for very little, as I’m not removing the audio version of it, nor redoing it.
Let me explain something to you…
This blog, which represents my life’s true work, is a much more intricate network of projects, than what stumbling upon a few posts here might make you think.
I generally do the “heavier” [multi step] editing jobs on a very irregular basis, as I’ve suffered from a deteriorating health condition most of my life, and it’s been especially bad these last few years.
I am an understanding and empathetic person…but this is just horse shit.
The MAP community does not exist to serve your whims, [T-G].
Were we ever anything in your mind, except something to exploit for “serving your purposes”?
We exist in the real world, well outside of your ambitions…and, no…where there is no good reason, I will not make changes.
Where is any of this “defaming” you? It is historical dialogue, over something which objectively took place.
Do not threaten me, nor this blog…Wordpress has an established history of standing up for our right of expression. I have full faith, that they will continue to do such.
You have an incredible amount of gall, making such threats against someone who’s dedicated decades of his life to this movement, all over your personally regretted, brief tryst into a vaguely related movement.
This was all your orchestration…I and others have a right to respond, and to keep work we consider important online, well after the fact.
You really are showing your true colors here, [T-G]…
At this point, you’ve turned this more into a threat against a strong principle, I’ve spent decades of my life fighting for…
…And, no…you are not going to stroll in here, and dictate to me what [falling entirely under fair use], I am allowed to quote, write or share on my own blog.
You do not throttle my speech, anymore than any of the other bozos who’ve threatened to do such, over the last two decades.
Go away, coward.
…But do go ahead and make your complaint to WordPress…I am a long term customer, in good standing with this business.
If they see an actual problem in what has happened here, they can take it up with me…and we can come to a resolution.
Rest assured, however…in doing such, you are merely joining a parade of other pathetic individuals, who’ve threatened this blog, and who’ve tried to get it taken down.
Date: December 26, 2019
“Some amusing video that was once uploaded on YouTube.”
So, he was abusive to MAPs on Twitter, got his account terminated, and this is his melt down over it?
This guy is unhinged.
I ask you sincerely, who deserves these words of vulgar abuse and hate, merely for daring to live, love and be loved?…
Have no doubt, that Child Love and Teen Love are a pure form of love…genuine and worthy of defense, no matter what some may say about it…
| THE WALL |
Date: November 29, 2019
“Radio host, Carrie Abbott (http://CarrieAbbott.com) and
A heavy conversation, but so important, if we are to learn how to protect kids & support survivors.”
We fight, because people like this are free to slander and libel us at will, without consequence, and even in the pursuit of personal, monetary gain.
This “interview” is a doozy.
You can follow the link to his Twitter account, take a look around, and come to your own conclusions about the extremity of his dehumanizing behavior.
He has a “business” which offers “professional advice” to churches, to “get/keep sexual predators out”. He produces and releases a seemingly endless stream of fear mongering, and libelous smearing against MAPs.
…all while exhibiting no actual understanding of MAPs, MAP issues or the MAP movement.
He appears to be a typical, abusive, exploitative bigot.
Hamburger Veermaster unpacks and critiques a typical Jon K Uhler rant.
…and gives a bit of background on Jon.
Do you feel right about having someone like Jon out there, spreading this type of dehumanizing propaganda?…If you are a MAP, are you okay with people like this, doing these things at your expense, and for a predatory personal profit?
|About This Series|
Date: November 25, 2019
“Sacha Baron Cohen is the well-deserved recipient of ADL’s International Leadership Award, which goes to exceptional individuals who combine professional success with a profound personal commitment to community involvement and to crossing borders and barriers with a message of diversity and equal opportunity.
Over 100 years ago Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis wrote: “Sunlight is said to be the best disinfectant.” Through his alter egos, many of whom represent anti-Semites, racists and neo-Nazis, Baron Cohen shines a piercing light on people’s ignorance and biases.
“First, Zuckerberg tried to portray this whole issue as “choices…around free expression.” That is ludicrous. This is not about limiting anyone’s free speech. This is about giving people, including some of the most reprehensible people on earth, the biggest platform in history to reach a third of the planet. Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach. Sadly, there will always be racists, misogynists, anti-Semites and child abusers. But I think we could all agree that we should not be giving bigots and pedophiles a free platform to amplify their views and target their victims.
Second, Zuckerberg claimed that new limits on what’s posted on social media would be to “pull back on free expression.” This is utter nonsense. The First Amendment says that “Congress shall make no law” abridging freedom of speech, however, this does not apply to private businesses like Facebook. We’re not asking these companies to determine the boundaries of free speech across society. We just want them to be responsible on their platforms.
In every other industry, you can be sued for the harm you cause. Publishers can be sued for libel, people can be sued for defamation. I’ve been sued many times! I’m being sued right now by someone whose name I won’t mention because he might sue me again! But social media companies are largely protected from liability for the content their users post—no matter how indecent it is—by Section 230 of, get ready for it, the Communications Decency Act. Absurd!
Fortunately, Internet companies can now be held responsible for pedophiles who use their sites to target children. I say, let’s also hold these companies responsible for those who use their sites to advocate for the mass murder of children because of their race or religion. And maybe fines are not enough. Maybe it’s time to tell Mark Zuckerberg and the CEOs of these companies: you already allowed one foreign power to interfere in our elections, you already facilitated one genocide in Myanmar, do it again and you go to jail.”
I’d like to point out here, that the U.S. government passing laws, which demand the fine or incarceration of business owners who let controversial people use their services is, necessarily, a violation of the first amendment!…
How on earth is this glaring, obvious point lost on Sacha?
The whole point of the amendment, is that the U.S. government is forbidden from interfering in free speech, be it in the political system or in the private sector.
You cannot claim that the government forcing a non government business to impose censorship upon it’s user base, is somehow not a violation of the first amendment. It absolutely is…and clearly so.
Nothing honestly surprises me, anymore…but I am sad to see such an expression coming out of him.
He’s targeting Facebook.
People who say this about Facebook, are almost universally ignorant of the “on the ground” realities, of being a “pedophile” trying to use Facebook’s services.
Facebook rolls over like nothing, and virtually never defends any form of speech, coming from self identified “pedophiles” [or supporters], not even when that speech is perfectly legal, honest, fair and ethical.
The historical pattern of behavior is as follows…
…anyone reports…automatic deletion…report, delete…report, delete…
This all happens out in the open…and yet, incredulously, there are endless waves of people who act oblivious towards it.
Facebook has only been draconian against open “pedophiles”…which is why it is so reviled, by many in the MAP community.
Of course, you can have and use a FB account, being a “pedophile”, and you’ll probably be left alone so long as you don’t outwardly identify as such, or talk “too much” about unapproved topics.
But, FB is a platform for speech and thought police.
Date: October 15, 2019
“Today, at 12:55 in the afternoon at the Liverpool Civil and Family Courts, Esther Baker was made bankrupt as a result of her crumbling libel claim against John Hemming and her failure to pay the costs order. At this point, most mentally healthy people would think again about supporting her. Two notable exceptions to common sense however are “Dr” Jacqui Dillon and Rotherham Councillor Jayne Senior. Despite Hemming now having won two libel claims against significant opposition – a former Guardian journalist and a charity CEO – these two women continue to refer to Baker’s allegations on Twitter.”
We fight back, because of slanderers and charlatans…
…And when we do fight back, we tend to win.
October 02, 2019
Thanks to feinmann0!
“A report found 415 complaints under ‘abuse of position for sexual purposes’
Suspects, victims of crime, children and witnesses are among those exploited
Comes after rapist Ian Naude preyed on his 13-year-old victim while a police constable in Cheshire
Hundreds of police officers have been accused of exploiting crime victims for sex by pretending to be ‘knights in shining armour.’
A total of 415 allegations have been made against officers for ‘abusing their position for a sexual purpose’ in three years, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary said.
Suspects, victims of crime, children, witnesses and vulnerable people are some of those who were exploited.
COMMENT from SUBMITTER:
When a country creates an unaccountable police state, as it clearly has in the UK, there is no limit to their criminality. The topic above is just one tip of a huge iceberg being uncovered. A second, larger chunk, is the police-enabled false allegations industry. The Daily Mail appears to be the only newspaper making some sort of effort to do the uncovering.”
What is the best way for an actual predator to evade the law?…
…It’s to become the exact person, responsible for enforcing the law in their area.
They can always fail to open an investigation on themselves.
If nothing happens at the early levels…nothing ultimately happens.
I’ve mentioned this a few times over the years, and it recurrently shows to be true…
…there are strong parallels between the mind of a criminal, and the mind of a cop…particularly the authoritarian type of cop.
They are both social bullies…and often a criminal could have become a cop, or a cop could have become a criminal.
This is a well established point of fact.
Yes…of course…”not all cops”…
But it’s still something social science has made clear.