Date: November 24, 2014
The “Pedo-Run Government”…
…which is throwing pedophiles into prison, left and right…and perpetually inventing new excuses to imprison, cripple and demonize pedophiles…?…
I almost fell over, when I heard Alex mention gay sex [prostitutes]…because it seems, since he came online, he wont mention gays and lesbians in any way that directly disparages them…But if you knew him from his short wave radio days, you know he absolutely would not allow an episode to pass, without attacking gays and lesbians…usually, numerous times, in every single episode.
If Alex Jones were behaving today as he did during his short wave radio days…”Infowars” would be identified as a hate group.
This says an awful lot about his true resolve.
One thing to remember about Alex Jones, is that he attaches himself to whatever social issue [or phobia] is most easy to exploit in the moment, and distances himself from any issue that will gain him to much trouble…Which is why he just talks about the fringe government conspiracies, today.
One of the things Alex Jones built his reputation, persona, business [or whatever it happens to be] upon…is the intolerance and smearing of sexual minorities…including mainstream gays and lesbians.
Today…if you only know this guy from his YouTube videos, you would be hard pressed to know anything about that.
Alex tries to put himself over as a decent, on the level person…when he is not.
He will say anything, or refrain from saying something, depending on whether he thinks he can get away with it.
…And that, my friends, is not integrity.
Date: April 28, 2014
“Twelve years on and the worldview of Reverend Jerry Vines is now shared by the British government, which has just announced that paedophiles are to be treated in the same way as terrorists. According to several sources, new legislation targeting paedophiles will be included in the Queen’s Speech. It appears that the UK prime minister, David Cameron, is determined to close a ‘loophole’ that permits paedophiles to publish and possess ‘manuals’ that offer tips to would-be predators on children about how to identify and groom their targets. The new law would authorise the use of the kind of extraordinary sanctions used to target terrorists who download bomb-making manuals. Cameron argued that it is ‘completely unacceptable that there is a loophole in the law which allows paedophiles to write and distribute these disgusting documents’.”
“The interweaving of the narrative of terrorism with that of paedophilia is driven by a tendency to attach campaigns and causes to the cause of child protection. Since its inception in September 2001, the war on terror has always been far too distant and abstract to capture the imagination of the British and European public. However, perceptions about the threat of stranger-danger to children are very different. Paedophilia has emerged as an all-purpose focus of dread, which is why policymakers tend to interpret threats through the idiom of child protection.”
This is not the sort of thing I keep mentioning, day after day…So, nobody can be blamed if they happen to be unaware…But as I’ve looked around and seen it, I have been the singular voice in the online pedosexual community, who over the past decade has been foretelling of the social and political trend to psychologically link pedophilia with terrorism.
I’ve been saying this for many, many years…that they are pushing this idea to a head, and it is going to result in new draconian laws, somewhere.
Here we are today, in 2014…and what I have been repeating over the past decade [at least], is materializing before our very eyes.
…The writing has been on the wall, mind you…if you cared to look and recognize it…I’m just a bit shocked, that more pedosexuals have not been speaking out against this trend.
Maybe…the whole idea seemed to far flung, to ludicrous to come to pass?…to awful to comprehend that a major world government in the so-called civilized world, would proclaim our simple speech to be “terrorism”?…
It is official now…Terrorists and the extreme, horrendous inhumanities they inflict upon the rest of us, have become the new foothold in which to attack pedosexuals…in which to manufacture new criminal behavior…in which to create a world, where a pedosexual can do nothing short of existing in complete silence and social paralysis, without falling afoul with the law.
The terrorism aimed and inflicted upon pedosexuals is expanding…and being propagated by allegedly moral, decent and fair government bodies…allegedly decent and intelligent people…
Their ultimate goal, has been to straight up criminalize the open, or even privately expressed speech of pedosexuals…So that we have zero lines of communication and expression.
My gut sense is that they even want it to be a crime for any pedosexual to speak back to them, even regarding what they are doing to us pedosexuals…They simply want a social and legal premises, on which to seize someone and lock them up, upon merely being identified as a pedosexual…That is where this is leading…declare every pedosexual expression [or behavior] a crime, and set about gathering up every suspected pedosexual…taking them away to some form of concentration camp.
Eventually…if they keep passing enough laws…we cannot help but be turned into criminals…at the hands of these barbaric politicians…and for behaviors, which nearly anybody else can take for granted as a freedom in these countries.
I want that last point to sink in…
…They are attacking our literal base ability of speech and expression, and calling it “terrorism”…
…Oh sure…they framed it as targeting “how to molest children manuals”…but the absurdity in this, is that the existence of such “manuals” as a social phenomena is so pathetically unsupported…There may be an extreme, tiny few instances of things which allegedly qualify as “how to” manuals dealing with this…but where are they, and how many of them can you [or anybody else] even cite?
This is nothing but a brazen assault against pedosexual expression…a step to be built upon, in the coming future…and over something which cannot even be intelligently argued, as a social phenomena or a social threat.
They are getting away with doing this stuff, based upon non-existent social problems…When the arguments for their terrorism against pedosexuals becomes this weak…and yet it still stands…you know that something very bad is about to happen.
I want to bring one last incite to this post…
“Child molestation manual”, is an extremely vague term…and one which remains undefined.
In the age of brief E-Books, explaining how to do all sorts of things…I have to question, if a simple webpage containing a paragraph or two which discusses a realistic adult/child sexual encounter, could be deemed a “child molestation manual”. It is all going to be subjective judgment…dealt out, by people who do not like “your” type of speech…And since they are already passing the threshold of making speech a crime…what are the safeguards in place, to stop them from throwing you into a prison [or concentration camp], because you’ve expressed a politically and socially unpopular thought?
…There aren’t any…Once things have gotten to the point where they successfully criminalize speech…things have already fallen off the edge of the cliff…The targeted minorities are lost in a complete, modern day social nightmare.
Entirely valid speech, which discusses and tries to explain intergenerational relationships of a sexual nature…are likely the ultimate target…The ultimate goal being, identifying and making a public example of those pedosexuals who stand up for their own human rights…intimidating the rest, deeper into silence.
I’ve never written a “how to” manual…and while I have written a small handful of child erotica stories over the years [published on appropriate websites], I’ve never discussed deeply how one might go about nurturing a relationship, with the ultimate goal being sex with minors. If I did such, I’d probably be shut down by my blog host, if I posted it or linked it here…So, I am painfully, frustratingly aware…of the fine line that I walk…
There are still a few things I have written, which I intend to republish here…They are a couple inclusions of my “In Self Defense” collection, where I get fairly deep and graphic, explaining some of my own sexual experiences as a boy…and one where I contrast two very different narratives, in order to argue the absurdity in equating one with the other. I’ve been in limbo, trying to decide the best path forward…because I am not willing to gut the very project, itself, of it’s core substance…But I also know, that it treads a fine and subjective line…Sometimes, I feel like I am being placed in an impossible situation…an entirely unjust situation. This is one of those times.
I question…At the very least…is my own blog, my own expression, going to be targeted and blocked, by the ISPs of Brittan?…the rest of Europe?…
What is happening right now, is not the behavior of a civilized or good natured people…
Pedophilia and terrorism have utterly nothing to do with each other…You cannot find two issues, which are more alien to each other.
I think we are presently witnessing…the beginning stages, of the human species next holocaust.
…They are finally making concrete outward movements, leading us down that path…after many years of vague [or not so vague] hints, that they were ultimately going to push this down everybody’s throats.
For all of it’s self aggrandizing…the human species has really learned nothing, where it most matters in social conflict…It still does not know how to get along in harmony, with it’s own kind…It still is it’s own worst enemy.
Pedosexuals are not your enemy…Stop pushing and attacking us!
This article actually deserves it’s own response…and I will likely come back to this, because I don’t want it to just be a footnote…But it ties in with this post, so I thought I would cite it.
Date: April 29, 2014
The very first sign of this I was pointed towards was published on April first, of 2014…So, in the back of my mind, I was thinking this might be an April Fools Day joke…
…So, I put this on the back burner, to wait and see what else would surface.
…At the end of the month, I decided to survey findings from a search engine…Apparently, this ghastly absurdity is no joke.
“Atheists, peaceful protesters and those who go to fight abroad have all been brought under the auspices of new “anti-terror” laws”
“Saudi Arabia has introduced a series of new laws which define atheists as terrorists, according to a report from Human Rights Watch.”
“Article one of the new provisions defines terrorism as “calling for atheist thought in any form, or calling into question the fundamentals of the Islamic religion on which this country is based”.
Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director of Human Rights Watch, said: “Saudi authorities have never tolerated criticism of their policies, but these recent laws and regulations turn almost any critical expression or independent association into crimes of terrorism.
“These regulations dash any hope that King Abdullah intends to open a space for peaceful dissent or independent groups,” Mr Stork said.”
“A rash of new laws issued in Saudi Arabia aim to blot out all political dissent — and in one case defines atheists as terrorists. The series of laws began in January of 2014. At the end of last month, Human Rights Watch issued a report explaining that “a series of related royal decrees create a legal framework that appears to criminalize virtually all dissident thought or expression as terrorism.”
“Saudi Arabia has officially identified atheists as terrorists in sweeping new laws that threaten up to 20 years in prison for almost any criticism of the government or Islam.
The regulations place secular citizens who commit thought crimes in the same category as violent terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda’s Yemen branch and Saudi Hezbollah.
Under the new decree by King Abdullah, Saudi Arabia will jail for up to 20 years anyone who fights in conflicts abroad – an apparent move to deter Saudis from joining rebels in Syria.
But the law also applies to any Saudi citizen or a foreigner residing in the kingdom that ‘calls for atheist thought in any form or calls into question the fundamentals of the Islamic religion on which this country is based.’
The laws have been denounced by human rights groups for making no distinction between religious expression and violent extremism.”
““Saudi authorities have never tolerated criticism of their policies, but these recent laws and regulations turn almost any critical expression or independent association into crimes of terrorism,” said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director at the HRW.”
“Those who swear allegiance to any party, organisation, current of thought, group or individual inside or outside the kingdom are also included in the provisions. The Muslim Brotherhood and various Al Qaeda factions are also among those on the list.”
“The legislation will address those who return with newfound training and ideas about overthrowing the monarchy.
Participation via forms of audio, written, visual media, social media, websites are all included in the definition.
Blogging for Al-Bab, Brian Whitaker writes that while the new laws might seem bizarre, “in Saudi terms it does have a certain logic. Since the entire system of government is based on Wahhabi interpretations of Islam, non-believers are assumed to be enemies of the Saudi state.”
“While the law cites violence as an essential element only in reference to attacks carried out against Saudis outside the kingdom or aboard Saudi transportation carriers, crucially it states that inside its borders, “terrorism” can be non-violent.
It can consist of “any act” intended to, among other things, to “insult the reputation of the state”, “harm public order”, or shake the security of society” – none of which the law clearly defines.”
“The new regulations come amid a campaign to silence independent activists and peaceful dissidents through intimidation, investigations, arrests, prosecutions, and imprisonment. On March 9, the prominent human rights activists Abdullah al-Hamid and Mohammed al-Qahtani completed their first year in prison, serving 11 and 10-year sentences, respectively, for criticizing the government’s human rights abuses and for membership in an unlicensed political and civil rights organization.
Two other human rights activists, Waleed Abu al-Khair and Mikhlif al-Shammari, recently lost appeals and will probably begin their three-month and five-year respective sentences soon for criticizing Saudi authorities.
On January 31, Saudi authorities promulgated the Penal Law for Crimes of Terrorism and its Financing (the “terrorism law”). The law has serious flaws, including vague and overly broad provisions that allow authorities to criminalize free expression, and the creation of excessive police powers without judicial oversight. The law cites violence as an essential element only in reference to attacks carried out against Saudis outside the kingdom or onboard Saudi transportation carriers. Inside the kingdom, “terrorism” can be non-violent – consisting of “any act” intended to, among other things, “insult the reputation of the state,” “harm public order,” or “shake the security of society,” which the law fails to clearly define.”
• Article 1: “Calling for atheist thought in any form, or calling into question the fundamentals of the Islamic religion on which this country is based.”
• Article 2: “Anyone who throws away their loyalty to the country’s rulers, or who swears allegiance to any party, organization, current [of thought], group, or individual inside or outside [the kingdom].”
• Article 4: “Anyone who aids [“terrorist”] organizations, groups, currents [of thought], associations, or parties, or demonstrates affiliation with them, or sympathy with them, or promotes them, or holds meetings under their umbrella, either inside or outside the kingdom; this includes participation in audio, written, or visual media; social media in its audio, written, or visual forms; internet websites; or circulating their contents in any form, or using slogans of these groups and currents [of thought], or any symbols which point to support or sympathy with them.”
• Article 6: “Contact or correspondence with any groups, currents [of thought], or individuals hostile to the kingdom.”
• Article 8: “Seeking to shake the social fabric or national cohesion, or calling, participating, promoting, or inciting sit-ins, protests, meetings, or group statements in any form, or anyone who harms the unity or stability of the kingdom by any means.”
• Article 9: “Attending conferences, seminars, or meetings inside or outside [the kingdom] targeting the security of society, or sowing discord in society.”
• Article 11: “Inciting or making countries, committees, or international organizations antagonistic to the kingdom.”
“Al-Qahtani and al-Hamid’s convictions included charges such as “breaking allegiance with the ruler,” “slandering the religiosity and integrity of the Supreme Council of Religious Scholars,” “sowing discord,” and “attempting to shake the internal security of the country by calling for demonstrations.” The new terrorism regulations classify several of these charges as acts of terrorism.
Other members of their organization, the Saudi Civil and Political Rights Association (ACPRA), are serving sentences for convictions on similar charges, including Mohammed al-Bajadi, Omar al-Saeed, and Abd al-Kareem al-Khodr. A jailed member, Fowzan al-Harbi, is on trial before the Riyadh Criminal Court on charges that include “participating in calling for and inciting breaking allegiance with the ruler,” “explicit libel of the integrity and religiosity of the Supreme Council of Religious Scholars,” “participating in setting up an unlicensed organization” – namely, ACPRA – “publishing details of his investigation,” and “describing the ruling Saudi regime – unjustly – as a police state.”
“On March 10, the SPA reported the conviction of another man, with a 10-year prison sentence and a 100,000 riyal fine ($26,600), for “engaging in following, saving, and resending inciting tweets on the social networking site (Twitter) against the rulers, religious scholars, and government agencies and his connection to people who call themselves reformists…”
Another human rights activist, Fadhil al-Manasif, who played a leading role in documenting abuses against demonstrators in the Eastern Province in 2011, is on trial for “sowing discord,” “inciting public opinion against the state,” and “communicating with foreign news agencies to exaggerate news and harm the reputation of the kingdom.”
And Riyadh-based human rights activists, Mohammed al-Otaibi and Abdullah al-Attawi, who came under investigation in April 2013 for co-founding a new human rights organization – The Union for Human Rights – face a new investigation based on their human rights activities.”
“While protecting public order and national security are recognized in international human rights law as legitimate purposes for limiting certain rights under narrow and clearly-defined circumstances, vague and overly broad legal provisions cannot be the basis for overriding a broad array of fundamental rights. Provisions of Saudi Arabia’s new terrorism regulations that deny any ability to exercise basic rights of peaceful assembly, association, and expression greatly exceed any notion of justifiable restrictions, Human Rights Watch said.
Commenting on article 6 of the regulation, one activist told Human Rights Watch on March 12: “Just talking to you now is considered terrorism – I could be prosecuted as a terrorist for this conversation.”
Apparently…we are witnessing a dictatorship in it’s death throws…Because this is an act of clear desperation.
If your regime’s standing is so fragile that it cannot stand up to any criticism…it is time to step aside, and admit that you are not fit to lead a nation.
Given the Saudi families penchant for extreme retaliation, against anybody under it’s control who does not kiss it’s behind and remain completely obedient…It is insane for anyone from that family, or from anywhere…to be pointing a finger at others [especially, entirely innocent others], and calling them “terrorists”.
The Saudi family’s pattern of behavior has far more legitimate claim, to being recognized as terrorism…than the actions of atheists, who speak out against said behaviors…who offer a legitimate resistance, to those human rights abuses.
Calling atheists “terrorists”, is an act of cowardice…it establishes that King Abdullah is out of touch with reality…drunk and crazed on his own power…desperate to keep hold, of power and wealth which never rightly belonged to him or his family, in the first place.
This is the same old, tired story, of the so called elite class against the rest of mankind…Some other man, always fancies themselves above the rest of us…with unquestionable authority and self righteous entitlement.
…It will be interesting to watch the Saudi family fall…though disturbing to contemplate, what might take their place.
…I have one more thing to say…It is a personal message.
Date: April 22, 2014
“One of Europe’s top police officers has warned of a sickening online trade in child torture porn.
Rob Wainwright, the director of Europol, said offenders are using the untraceable online currency Bitcoin to pay for depraved ‘shows’, performed live on webcams, which see young children raped and burned.
He said: ‘The level of depravity seems to be descending year on year, frankly, including what seems to be in vogue now, which is live webcam ‘shows’ of toddlers not just being raped but being burnt with cigarettes.”
This outrageous trend just never ends…
…So, now Rob Wainwright and his people have allegedly stumbled across some underground, likely small clique of sadists who are into abusing small children…
…And somehow, this is the fault of pedophiles?
What Rob Wainwright describes, is patently sadist behavior…It is not pedophilia.
The fact that these sadists allegedly chose children, is incidental…
Heck, truth be told…those were likely either the children of these sadists…or they were children, which these sadists had full access to…You know, situations like “the girlfriend’s kid”…or foster care horror stories…
Now, maybe there is a small sub-culture of pedophile sadists which exists…but sadism is in no way equivalent to pedophilia. These are two vastly different things…The world is large…If you keep looking long enough, eventually you find that even contradicting things will sometimes converge.
Thing is…what results is a sort of “hybrid”…which is not exactly one or the other…It’s issues and behaviors, are not the responsibility or fault, of whichever base minorities it is taking it’s roots from.
BitCoin [and the obsessive bemoaning of encryption] gets dragged into this, as well…making this propaganda piece a blatant, all out assault on internet privacy, as well…Not just another golden opportunity, to spread hate speech and drag pedophiles through the mud.
…That brings up another matter, which leaves me in dismay…these cops who have decided for themselves, that none of us should have competent and secure encryption…They either want it gone, or they want default back doors…either option would decimate commerce and privacy on the internet, and open the door wide for criminal activity…It would leave people much more vulnerable…This is not a question of “who has something to hide”, people…It’s a question of how long it takes the wrong people, to discover ways to exploit these back doors…and an endless treadmill, of trying to patch those holes.
…No thank you!…If you cannot even trust your encryption to actually keep you [and your content] safe…then you, effectively, don’t have encryption.
Cops do not have the right, to strip us of our encryption…And I am speaking as someone who has nothing of prosecutable value to hide…At this point in time, nothing I have can lead to grounds for legal prosecution. My own concern, is straight up personal privacy…and not allowing others to snoop through my entirely legal [if sometimes controversial], private files.
Lastly, I just wanted to respond to part of one commenters words…
“The sickening depravity of these people knows no bounds…”
This individual did not explicitly say they were referring to pedophiles…but given historic trends, I am hard pressed to conceive, what other group they might be aiming this comment at.
I wanted to state in no uncertain terms, what I know that pedosexuals like myself, who I have associated with for years, would also attest to…
…What is described in this “news” story, is not something in any way associated with my own interests or pursuits. I find the rape and torture of children to be deplorable and inhumane. Provided this case is real, then this is a prime example of a situation where intervention is required. The persons responsible for the literal rape and torture of children, deserve to be prosecuted to the fullest extent possible.
Kindly do not presume that because we are pedosexuals [pedophiles], we somehow approve of or support this kind of behavior.
We don’t deserve to be blamed, for what a small handful of cruel sadists are allegedly doing to children.