Category Archives: The System Gone Wrong

Fresh Air: ‘Why Kids Sext’ Describes Nude Photos As ‘Social Currency’ Among Teens…

……
….

Date: October 15, 2014

…’Why Kids Sext’ Describes Nude Photos As ‘Social Currency’ Among Teens…

“In April, residents of Louisa County, Va., were shocked to learn of a sexting “ring” among the town’s teenagers. When Hanna Rosin asked teens from Louisa County High School how many people they knew who had sexted, a lot of them replied: “Everyone.” But what was originally characterized in the media as an organized criminal affair was soon revealed to be widespread teen behavior.

“I think we as a culture don’t know whether to be utterly alarmed by sexting, or think of it as a normal part of teenage sexual experimentation,” Rosin tells Fresh Air’s Terry Gross.”

“[The police] call the girls in and they think there’s something really, really wrong — something unusual and sinister happening right under their nose — that’s how the investigation starts. … But by the law any picture of a minor is illegal and so they just ask the girl[s] who they call in for interviews, “Well, do you know anyone else who has naked pictures on their phone?”

And everyone says, “Yeah! I know five people,” or “I know 10 people.”

And remember: This is a relatively small town so people are trusting the police officers. They all know each other. So then they call in five people and then they call in five people and then they call in five people and pretty soon the investigator has bins full of cellphones with pictures of naked kids that belong to teenagers. …

So they’ve moved from thinking this is sinister to realizing, within a few days, this is completely common.”

“On how these teenage girls felt about the boys seeing pictures of them naked

That’s what’s amazing to me that this is so common given what we all know to be true about teenage awkwardness. The girls would actually get around this. I mean, some girls are just into it. They look great, they look like the pop stars they see, they’re proud to send their pictures.”

Well…yes…

…Here we have another example of going straight to the source, of one of the sex abuse industries current pet hysterias…”sexting”…

…Yup…teenagers!

“100 kids in a high school, caught in a sexting ring”…

…As it turns out…they were into it…and it was their own thing…

The big issue here, is that some dirt bag published these pictures on a website…when they were expected to remain private.

“Sexting” is a home grown phenomena, created and maintained by teenagers [legal minors].

…It is not something which “pedophiles” are behind…despite that certain groups have created propaganda, which suggests otherwise.

…And, amongst teenagers…it is “completely common”…

So…legal minors are “victimizing themselves” by posing in, and creating, “child pornography”…

…Curious spin, huh?…especially in the face of raging, teenage sexual hormones…

You know…I want to be totally fair, and acknowledge that it is scummy for anyone to betray the trust of another…and I do think, something wrong happened in the case talked about…

…but it is ludicrous and inhuman, to fail in understanding that this is just teenage sexuality [and social culture], in the age of this type of technology.

It is despicable…that such a thing is criminalized.

I have to repeat myself again…and point out, that when left to their own devices…legal minors will, themselves, adopt and take over the “child porn industry”…

…because what they are doing…they like doing it.

Whether or not this deserves being called “child pornography”, is a whole other argument…But it’s good enough propaganda for the sex abuse industry…So, I’ll roll with their extremely broad definition, even if only to shove this reality back into their face…

…and expose what cretins they are.

It is time for this idiocy to end…I implore everyone…unite, and bring this tragedy born of intolerance and idiocy to an end.

Nobody should ever have their lives hindered or destroyed, because of others who wont tolerate their common and consensual sexuality.

….

……………………………………………

Hate Speech: “The Phone of Pedophiles”?…

……

……………………………………| Perverted Justice Journal | The Vile Files |
……………………………………………
| PLEASE CLICK HERE AND READ |

….

Date: September 30, 2014

…News: The Phone Of Choice For the Pedophile…

…News: The Phone Of Choice For the Pedophile…

…Police Chief Calls Apple ‘The Phone Of Choice For The Pedophile’…

…Police Chief Calls Apple ‘The Phone Of Choice For The Pedophile’…

““Apple will become the phone of choice for the pedophile,” Chicago PD chief of detectives John Escalante said in a Thursday Washington Post report. “The average pedophile at this point is probably thinking, I’ve got to get an Apple phone.”

Apple announced last week that users who update their devices to iOS 8 will now have all of their data automatically encrypted, meaning it will only be viewable with the device owner’s corresponding Apple password. Even if law enforcement were to obtain the data from Apple, they would be locked out via the new auto-encryption. Google announced similar standards for its Android mobile platform the next day.

[…]

Officials responsible for making the allegations have been accused of fearmongering in the media, as law enforcement will still be capable of obtaining traditional warrants to tap phone lines, read texts and search call records provided by service providers like Verizon, AT&T and others.

Apple CEO Tim Cook announced the changes as part of a broader Apple effort to improve user privacy and data security. Cook said he is committed to keeping Apple from becoming a “treasure trove” of private user data for the NSA.”


…Pedos Prefer iPhones, Claims FBI Director…

…Pedos Prefer iPhones, Claims FBI Director…

…FBI blasts Apple, Google for locking police out of phones…

…FBI blasts Apple, Google for locking police out of phones…

“FBI Director James B. Comey sharply criticized Apple and Google on Thursday for developing forms of smartphone encryption so secure that law enforcement officials cannot easily gain access to information stored on the devices — even when they have valid search warrants.

His comments were the most forceful yet from a top government official but echo a chorus of denunciation from law enforcement officials nationwide. Police have said that the ability to search photos, messages and Web histories on smartphones is essential to solving a range of serious crimes, including murder, child pornography and attempted terrorist attacks.

[…]

Comey added that FBI officials already have made initial contact with the two companies, which announced their new smartphone encryption initiatives last week. He said he could not understand why companies would “market something expressly to allow people to place themselves beyond the law.”

[…]

The new encryption initiatives by Apple and Google come after June’s Supreme Court ruling requiring police, in most circumstances, to get a search warrant before gathering data from a cellphone. The magistrate courts that typically issue search warrants, meanwhile, are more carefully scrutinizing requests amid the heightened privacy concerns that followed the NSA disclosures that began last year.

Civil liberties activists call this shift a necessary correction to the deterioration of personal privacy in the digital era — and especially since Apple’s introduction of the iPhone in 2007 inaugurated an era in which smartphones became remarkably intimate companions of people everywhere.”


I can think of a few reasons why Apple and Google would do this, and it has nothing to do with Mr. Comey’s “allow people to place themselves beyond the law.”, shameful hyperbole…

On the one hand, U.S. government agencies have habitually proven themselves to be untrustworthy, when they have these kinds of powers and options. Some people in these agencies have committed crimes, in their own right, by their invasion of the privacy of citizens. They are virtually never held accountable for this…Many, many, many, many, many U.S. citizens are fed up with this entirely unacceptable state of affairs.

On another hand…these companies [at least Google] have suffered for violating legal agreements with their customers in the past, by allowing U.S. government agencies to do what these companies promised would never happen. They are trying to atone for their trespasses, and win back the trust of their customer base…These are for profit businesses, after all…and they have to provide what the customer demands, and with loyal integrity…or their business model will fail.

To make things all the more harrowing…we are living in an age, where it is becoming a trend for major businesses to have their services hacked into by hackers…Our latest experience with this is Home Depot. Being someone who has been violated by this exact same trend more than once now [in the past couple of years]…I cannot even begin to tell you how fed up I am with it…nor how irreconcilably non-negotiable, encryption of the strongest quality possible is.

…But, the FBI and cops don’t want us having the best possible encryption…Heck, it seems they don’t like us having encryption at all, and so long as it makes their jobs [or any inhibition that comes with them] easier…they’d love us all haplessly setting out here, vulnerable to anyone with the ability to violate our privacy.

…Wonderful…

So…they’ve put out the quotable “sound bite” now…and these vindictive cretins have decided to smear Apple…dumping this idiotic nonsense about “iPhones being the choice of pedophiles”…

…Irony here, is that I, as a pedophile, would not even know anything about any of this, had these hyperventilating screwballs not soiled themselves, and thrown a tantrum in front of the nation.

They are making this up…It is hyperbole, of a shameful and despicable nature…Many of us pedophiles don’t give a flying flip, about getting an iPhone…I, for one, use a cell phone that does not even have a built in camera…I doubt this new revelation is going to change anything, as my current service meets both my budget and my current needs.

…Besides, aren’t the majority of these “child porn”, cell phone cases teenagers sexting each other?…as in, most are not pedophiles, at all?

These FBI [etc.] cretins, are trying to bully Apple and Google, by “naming and shaming” them…and trying to link those two companies with the social “pedophile” stigma.

…Real classy…

One last thing…

…I would like all onlookers to understand [and especially the FBI, and other LEO, even if they are less likely to be looking on]…that as a pedophile, I have every bit as much legitimate, legal activity as anybody else, which requires solid, strong encryption. Just because I am a pedophile, does not mean that I am unentitled to the best encryption available.

Every bit as importantly…just because I am a pedophile, does not make it right or acceptable for any of you to suspect me, discriminate against me, or invade my privacy in any way…Nor does it make it acceptable, for you to use people like me as the butt of your bully pulpit.

…And this “choice of pedophiles” comment…it deserves to be classed amongst the ranks of the most vile, racist and phobic hate speech ever spoken.

….

……………………………………………

Ring of Fire 08/17/2014 (FULL EPISODE)…


Date: August 20, 2014

…Ring of Fire 08/17/2014 (FULL EPISODE…

Published on Aug 18, 2014
00:44 – “The Tea Party’s Charity Swindle.” David TeSelle explains how pro-troop charities are being used to fund Tea Party candidates. #TeaPartyCheats

10:10 – “Scalia’s Son Sabotaging Wall Street Reform.” Howard Nations tells us how Antonin Scalia’s son is working to undermine meaningful finance reform. #FinanceReform

19:44 – “BP Still Won’t Pay Up.” Newspaper publisher Rick Outzen talks about BP’s ongoing fight to avoid their full liability for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil rig disaster. #PayUpBP

29:23 – “McDonnell Trial Highlights GOP’s Corrupt Nature.” David Haynes explains why the Bob McDonnell trial is a prime example of the GOP culture of corruption. #McDonnellTrial

38:11 – “V.A. Horror Stories Mounting.” Christopher Lavorato gives us the latest developments in the VA care scandal that is leaving our troops with subpar care. #VADisaster

47:13 – “The Backstory.” Progressive host David Pakman joins us for a discussion of the news that the corporate media refused to talk about.

Hate Speech Against Pedophiles, Is Still Hate Speech…


Date: July 29, 2014

…Response to This…

…Response to This…

“Interesting, those countries that have outlawed hate speech (like Canada) haven’t adopted the kill the paedo stuff as a form of hate speech.”

…And it’s very troubling, that they have not.

The thing about only “special classes” of hate speech being covered, is that it sidesteps the problem for certain demographics. By omission, they essentially encourage certain types of hate speech…when they are having a law, supposedly to curtail hate speech.

This is one of the reasons why I’ve harped on this issue, in the past.

…I don’t want people locked up for expressing nasty things…But if anyone is going to have the nerve to write and maintain laws against hate speech…then they have no business picking and choosing what flavor of hate speech they want to go after.

I’ve seen the kind of stuff you mention, nitro…and I think it is a disgrace, and shows how honestly uncommitted to the cause lawmakers are, when hate speech against pedophiles is not even acknowledged in these laws…It is one of the worst, most saturated and vile forms of hate speech in existence.

It’s like I was saying when they wrote and passed these laws in the U.S…when it comes to pedophiles [and ephebophiles], you are not going to find any demographic in more dire need of the protection, that these laws claim to provide…Yet, it’s only going to the politically correct gays and lesbians.

If that doesn’t tell you that these laws are a politically correct sham, and that nobody honestly cares about fighting hate speech where it actually counts the most…then I don’t believe anything will.

When an individual becomes savagely violent…


Date: July 23, 2014

…Real facts regarding Raymond Frolander…

…Real facts regarding Raymond Frolander…

When an individual becomes savagely violent…

…this always points towards something deep and psychological, within that person.

This, along with the severity of the brutal assault [which is not even remotely normal, nor sane behavior]…is what quickly led me to the conclusion, that there is something very wrong with this dangerous father.

Without it being explicitly stated before now, it was immediately clear…not only was that pure hate…there was a violent murder in progress. If you did not see that from the picture, alone…then you are either blind, or very naïve…

There is a reason why I snuck the term “murder” into one of my previous responses to this…Because attempted murder is written all over this. And here we are, now, with this guy actually admitting, he was in the process of murdering the eighteen year old…And Chief Chitwood still has no grounds to remove this violent, murderous predator from the public?

Who wants to bet, that psycho daddy dearest has a criminal record of his own, and that he has spent more than a little time behind bars, himself?

Anyone with the ability to explode into violent rage, like that…who has 35 years of living behind him…is almost guaranteed to have done some messed up stuff.

If Chief Chitwood admires psycho daddy dearest so much…maybe he can create a special class of deputy…He can have his own “sex abuse survivor” division…Mint off nice shiny badges, which boldly declare the wearer “Sex Abuse Survivor”…Print them off a license, suitable for framing…And set them loose, walking about town and violently assaulting any pervert that “sets off their trigger”…

…I’m confident, in Florida…a lot of people would applaud this…

…After all…don’t “sex abuse survivors” have the god given, righteous, inalienable right, to shit all over and abuse any pervert they don’t like, in whatever way they please?

Reading way to many comments on these news stories…you’d think public sentiment mandates and commissions just exactly that.

…And asking for one million dollars, out of this?!!

…Unless you are going to substantiate, that the eleven year old was being anally raped [or suffered heinous injury], and now needs extensive medical care, then what exactly about this situation requires one million dollars?!

The son seemed plenty spry enough, to stop his grown father from murdering a literally helpless human being…and apparently talk on the phone to police, too…Which doesn’t sound like someone mortally injured.

It sounds like there was something extremely exaggerated and warped, going on in psycho daddy dearests own head.

Oh…but that poor, poor thing…he’s a sex abuse victim, so “it’s all okay”…He’s just getting his entitled righteous revenge by surrogate.

…I am so sick to death of these…people…for whom something bad may have happened…so now they live as though they are entitled to take it all out on other people…without any accountability or consequence to themselves, whatsoever.

Yes…it’s just ludicrous and unthinkable, to expect them to behave in any civilized or humane manner, when their “trigger” has been set off…They cant help themselves…and it’s wrong, after all they’ve endured, to hold them accountable for personal lack of control…violent savagery…murder…

Is there any semblance of legal and social order in Florida, at all?

Forgive me…This post is a tad bit ugly…

…You just have no idea how deeply it disgusts me, watching people make excuses for savage animals like that, and turning a blind eye when they’ve clearly blown way, way past the line of acceptability…

Just because something crappy may have happened to you [Just as crappy things have happened to all of us…Join the freaking club!], does not mean you get a “free pass” in all of the rest of life.

Hell…even genuine victims can cross a line, and transition into something that is very, very wrong. They don’t deserve being defended.

You survey what at times comes off as positively gleeful approval, of this blatantly fucked up, indefensible shit…

…it always brings me back to the depressing understanding, of just why the human species deserves to go extinct…

Being part of this species embarrasses and demoralizes the insane fuck out of me, at times like these.

I have all the genuine human sympathies in the world, for people who’ve been sexually brutalized…But just because your pee pee was touched, before you reached a certain age, does not mean you’ve been transformed into “a human god” walking the planet. Hell…even if you were gang raped, and debilitated for life…this still does not place you above anyone else.

It’s not the fault of every other pervert on this planet, if you were poked or groped by someone you didn’t want.

…Am I an asshole, for saying all of this?…Any of it?

Deep, complicated frustrations…Very deep…Very complicated…Very frustrating.

Sometimes…I’d like something to punch on, too.

Chief Chitwood is a Derelict LEO…


Date: July 19, 2014

…Florida Dad batters teen who was ‘molesting son’…

…Florida Dad batters teen who was ‘molesting son’…

…’Send an ambulance – he’s going to need one’: Father who walked in on a man molesting his son, 11, beat him to a pulp before calling cops to say ‘I have him in a bloody puddle for you’…

…’Send an ambulance – he’s going to need one’: Father who walked in on a man molesting his son, 11, beat him to a pulp before calling cops to say ‘I have him in a bloody puddle for you’…

Before anything showed up [on BoyChat], I read a much shorter account of this on Yahoo!…I wrote something longish, and bordering on scathing…with regards to these cases where accused [but not yet charged and proven guilty] sexual minority members are violently assaulted, in a way and to a degree, which cannot be sanely justified…and nobody, not in law enforcement or anywhere [will gay and lesbian groups even say anything?]…nobody does anything about it.

I don’t think I am going to post what I wrote anywhere…Not sure how many people honestly appreciate my writings of that nature, anyway…and with a few more details being introduced [are they truth or lies?…who knows!…It’s the media.]…I feel like I should already make changes to it to reflect these allegations.

Bottom line is…If Raymond [the eighteen year old] was not resisting and was not behaving in a way that posed a threat [did not argue, throw a punch or pull a weapon, etc.], then the father had zero justification in laying a finger on him…to say nothing, of inhumanely beating him into unconsciousness.

If he was honestly raping the eleven year old, and threatening him…let the legal system deal with him.

Normal protocol is to only interfere, until whatever threat is going on stops [and sometimes not even then]…If he runs, let him go. It sounds like the cops would have just picked him up in some other part of town, later.

The degree of vicious, violent assault the father gave Raymond…I don’t care how fucked up the laws and common sentiment in Florida are…This is not legal…full stop…There is no room for tolerance, for this type of thing.

Even though I tried to separate my base rant from this specific case [because of the unknowns]…it still remains true…Of all the people caught up in these kinds of cases and violent assault, it is the people accused who most need their human rights guarded.

If Raymond did wrong…he will face not only the legal system, but pure hell…

Unless Raymond pulled a weapon, attacked the boy or the father…then the father needs to be brought up on charges…Because what the unnamed father did, is no small or simple act of “saving his son”. He crossed a line, in a severe and cruel way…At what point during this violent assault, did Raymond continue to remain a danger? How long did the father continue, when it was not even necessary?…Obviously, it went on for a while, even after Raymond was incapacitated…

That kid was likely smaller, weaker, stunned and mortified that he was caught…possibly stunned, by an unexpected attack…likely little more than a disoriented, bloodied punching bag…

…and on top of all this, the eleven year old gets to watch his own father violently “murdering” someone else…

There is no argument to be made, that justifies this.

…Getting caught or accused of something, does not mean that your own human rights are no longer protected by the law.

It is staggering, and even sickening, to witness just how quickly Chief Chitwood has dismissed this brutal assault.

He is a good example of why so many people are disgusted with law enforcement.

Dangerous Diagnoses, Risky Assumptions, and the Failed Experiment of ‘Sexually Violent Predator’ Commitment…

……
….

Date: July 6, 2014


Dangerous Diagnoses, Risky Assumptions, and the Failed Experiment of ‘Sexually Violent Predator’ Commitment

Deirdre M. Smith
University of Maine School of Law

June 9, 2014


…Link…

Abstract:

In the 1997 opinion, Kansas v. Hendricks, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a law that presented a new model of civil commitment. The targets of these new commitment laws were dubbed “Sexually Violent Predators,” and the Court upheld this form of indefinite detention on the assumption that there is a psychiatrically distinct class of individuals who, unlike typical recidivists, have a mental condition that impairs their ability to refrain from violent sexual behavior. And, more specifically, the Court assumed that the justice system could reliably identify the true “predators,” those for whom this unusual and extraordinary deprivation of liberty is appropriate and legitimate, with the aid of testimony from mental health professionals. This Article evaluates the extent to which those assumptions were correct and concludes that they were seriously flawed and, therefore, the due process rationale used to uphold the SVP laws is invalid. The category of the “Sexually Violent Predator” is a political and moral construct, not a medical classification. The implementation of the laws has resulted in dangerous distortions of both psychiatric expertise and important legal principles, and such distortions reveal an urgent need to re-examine the Supreme Court’s core rationale in upholding the SVP commitment experiment.

At 77 pages, this PDF presents a substantial read…It will take you some time.

The Social Science Research Network has a typical, fairly painless sign up process…user accounts are free.

Download and read this

This is important information. It strikes at the core of a menacing threat facing pedosexuals…permanent involuntary civil commitment.

It looks to be very solid…and very damning of what government bodies in the U.S. have been doing, underneath this “sexually violent predator” concept they have created.

I urge anyone with a sincere interest in what is happening to sexual deviants, with regards to civil commitment, to download and read this paper.


Thoughts after reading this…

This details a lot of the head butting between the APA and the U.S. government, while the government was trying to pass this new law…It discusses the APA’s condemnation of it.

It also goes into some detail about the predecessor to this law, and what a failed effort that was.

It discusses the opportunistic nature of the government…which essentially had people like Earl Shriner and Leroy Hendricks as the “poster child” of this new law…two people with quite terrible pasts [kidnapping and murder, for at least one of them]. Yet, the general groups which have been targeted by these SVP laws typically have non-contact offenses…and cannot reasonably be represented by people like Shriner and Hendricks.

The loose and flighty nature of this law, it’s enforcement…it’s poor standards of “proof”…the heavy controversy over philias, over “mental abnormalities”…and the mental health fields inability to predict recidivism…All are touched on, in this paper.

This is a rather solid, slam dunk condemnation of SVP law and the practice of indefinite commitment to containment centers [“hospitals”].

The depths of this governments depravity are no shock, at all…Heck, we [quite a number of us] have been talking and writing about this exact kind of thing in BoyLove and Girl-Love circles for years…

…Now, it is finally starting to show up in academic research…And of course, if the researchers are honest and ethical then it has to…It is the truth of the matter, after all.

Thank you, Deirdre M. Smith! It is wonderful to discover, that truth and integrity are still surviving [if barely], within the field of “sex law” research.

….

Frontline: United States of Secrets…

……
….

Date: May 22, 2014

“How did the government come to spy on millions of Americans? In United States of Secrets, FRONTLINE goes behind the headlines to reveal the dramatic inside story of the U.S. government’s massive and controversial secret surveillance program — and the lengths it went to try to keep it hidden from the public.”

…United States of Secrets (Part One)…

…United States of Secrets (Part Two)…

No comments today…Just offered for your consideration.

….

Pedophilia and Terrorism: What Have I Been Saying, All These Many, Many Years?…


Date: April 28, 2014

…The War on Paedos: Grooming the Public’s Fear [BoyChat]…

…The War on Paedos: Grooming the Public’s Fear [BoyChat]…

…The War on Paedos: Grooming the Public’s Fear [Original Article]…

…The War on Paedos: Grooming the Public’s Fear [Original Article]…

“Twelve years on and the worldview of Reverend Jerry Vines is now shared by the British government, which has just announced that paedophiles are to be treated in the same way as terrorists. According to several sources, new legislation targeting paedophiles will be included in the Queen’s Speech. It appears that the UK prime minister, David Cameron, is determined to close a ‘loophole’ that permits paedophiles to publish and possess ‘manuals’ that offer tips to would-be predators on children about how to identify and groom their targets. The new law would authorise the use of the kind of extraordinary sanctions used to target terrorists who download bomb-making manuals. Cameron argued that it is ‘completely unacceptable that there is a loophole in the law which allows paedophiles to write and distribute these disgusting documents’.”

[…]

“The interweaving of the narrative of terrorism with that of paedophilia is driven by a tendency to attach campaigns and causes to the cause of child protection. Since its inception in September 2001, the war on terror has always been far too distant and abstract to capture the imagination of the British and European public. However, perceptions about the threat of stranger-danger to children are very different. Paedophilia has emerged as an all-purpose focus of dread, which is why policymakers tend to interpret threats through the idiom of child protection.”

This is not the sort of thing I keep mentioning, day after day…So, nobody can be blamed if they happen to be unaware…But as I’ve looked around and seen it, I have been the singular voice in the online pedosexual community, who over the past decade has been foretelling of the social and political trend to psychologically link pedophilia with terrorism.

I’ve been saying this for many, many years…that they are pushing this idea to a head, and it is going to result in new draconian laws, somewhere.

Here we are today, in 2014…and what I have been repeating over the past decade [at least], is materializing before our very eyes.

…The writing has been on the wall, mind you…if you cared to look and recognize it…I’m just a bit shocked, that more pedosexuals have not been speaking out against this trend.

Maybe…the whole idea seemed to far flung, to ludicrous to come to pass?…to awful to comprehend that a major world government in the so-called civilized world, would proclaim our simple speech to be “terrorism”?…

It is official now…Terrorists and the extreme, horrendous inhumanities they inflict upon the rest of us, have become the new foothold in which to attack pedosexuals…in which to manufacture new criminal behavior…in which to create a world, where a pedosexual can do nothing short of existing in complete silence and social paralysis, without falling afoul with the law.

The terrorism aimed and inflicted upon pedosexuals is expanding…and being propagated by allegedly moral, decent and fair government bodies…allegedly decent and intelligent people…

Their ultimate goal, has been to straight up criminalize the open, or even privately expressed speech of pedosexuals…So that we have zero lines of communication and expression.

My gut sense is that they even want it to be a crime for any pedosexual to speak back to them, even regarding what they are doing to us pedosexuals…They simply want a social and legal premises, on which to seize someone and lock them up, upon merely being identified as a pedosexual…That is where this is leading…declare every pedosexual expression [or behavior] a crime, and set about gathering up every suspected pedosexual…taking them away to some form of concentration camp.

Eventually…if they keep passing enough laws…we cannot help but be turned into criminals…at the hands of these barbaric politicians…and for behaviors, which nearly anybody else can take for granted as a freedom in these countries.

I want that last point to sink in…

…They are attacking our literal base ability of speech and expression, and calling it “terrorism”…

…Oh sure…they framed it as targeting “how to molest children manuals”…but the absurdity in this, is that the existence of such “manuals” as a social phenomena is so pathetically unsupported…There may be an extreme, tiny few instances of things which allegedly qualify as “how to” manuals dealing with this…but where are they, and how many of them can you [or anybody else] even cite?

This is nothing but a brazen assault against pedosexual expression…a step to be built upon, in the coming future…and over something which cannot even be intelligently argued, as a social phenomena or a social threat.

They are getting away with doing this stuff, based upon non-existent social problems…When the arguments for their terrorism against pedosexuals becomes this weak…and yet it still stands…you know that something very bad is about to happen.

I want to bring one last incite to this post…

“Child molestation manual”, is an extremely vague term…and one which remains undefined.

In the age of brief E-Books, explaining how to do all sorts of things…I have to question, if a simple webpage containing a paragraph or two which discusses a realistic adult/child sexual encounter, could be deemed a “child molestation manual”. It is all going to be subjective judgment…dealt out, by people who do not like “your” type of speech…And since they are already passing the threshold of making speech a crime…what are the safeguards in place, to stop them from throwing you into a prison [or concentration camp], because you’ve expressed a politically and socially unpopular thought?

…There aren’t any…Once things have gotten to the point where they successfully criminalize speech…things have already fallen off the edge of the cliff…The targeted minorities are lost in a complete, modern day social nightmare.

Entirely valid speech, which discusses and tries to explain intergenerational relationships of a sexual nature…are likely the ultimate target…The ultimate goal being, identifying and making a public example of those pedosexuals who stand up for their own human rights…intimidating the rest, deeper into silence.

I’ve never written a “how to” manual…and while I have written a small handful of child erotica stories over the years [published on appropriate websites], I’ve never discussed deeply how one might go about nurturing a relationship, with the ultimate goal being sex with minors. If I did such, I’d probably be shut down by my blog host, if I posted it or linked it here…So, I am painfully, frustratingly aware…of the fine line that I walk…

There are still a few things I have written, which I intend to republish here…They are a couple inclusions of my “In Self Defense” collection, where I get fairly deep and graphic, explaining some of my own sexual experiences as a boy…and one where I contrast two very different narratives, in order to argue the absurdity in equating one with the other. I’ve been in limbo, trying to decide the best path forward…because I am not willing to gut the very project, itself, of it’s core substance…But I also know, that it treads a fine and subjective line…Sometimes, I feel like I am being placed in an impossible situation…an entirely unjust situation. This is one of those times.

I question…At the very least…is my own blog, my own expression, going to be targeted and blocked, by the ISPs of Brittan?…the rest of Europe?…

What is happening right now, is not the behavior of a civilized or good natured people…

Pedophilia and terrorism have utterly nothing to do with each other…You cannot find two issues, which are more alien to each other.

I think we are presently witnessing…the beginning stages, of the human species next holocaust.

…They are finally making concrete outward movements, leading us down that path…after many years of vague [or not so vague] hints, that they were ultimately going to push this down everybody’s throats.

For all of it’s self aggrandizing…the human species has really learned nothing, where it most matters in social conflict…It still does not know how to get along in harmony, with it’s own kind…It still is it’s own worst enemy.

Pedosexuals are not your enemy…Stop pushing and attacking us!


Also related…

…UK:Downloading child abuse ‘manuals’ to be illegal [Boychat]…

…UK:Downloading child abuse ‘manuals’ to be illegal [Boychat]…

…Downloading child abuse ‘manuals’ to be made illegal [Article]…

…Downloading child abuse ‘manuals’ to be made illegal [Article]…

This article actually deserves it’s own response…and I will likely come back to this, because I don’t want it to just be a footnote…But it ties in with this post, so I thought I would cite it.

One Atheist Responding to Saudi King Abdullah…


Date: April 29, 2014

The very first sign of this I was pointed towards was published on April first, of 2014…So, in the back of my mind, I was thinking this might be an April Fools Day joke…

…So, I put this on the back burner, to wait and see what else would surface.

…At the end of the month, I decided to survey findings from a search engine…Apparently, this ghastly absurdity is no joke.


…Saudi Arabia declares all atheists are terrorists in new law to crack down on political dissidents…

…Saudi Arabia declares all atheists are terrorists in new law to crack down on political dissidents…

“Atheists, peaceful protesters and those who go to fight abroad have all been brought under the auspices of new “anti-terror” laws”

“Saudi Arabia has introduced a series of new laws which define atheists as terrorists, according to a report from Human Rights Watch.”

“Article one of the new provisions defines terrorism as “calling for atheist thought in any form, or calling into question the fundamentals of the Islamic religion on which this country is based”.

Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director of Human Rights Watch, said: “Saudi authorities have never tolerated criticism of their policies, but these recent laws and regulations turn almost any critical expression or independent association into crimes of terrorism.

“These regulations dash any hope that King Abdullah intends to open a space for peaceful dissent or independent groups,” Mr Stork said.”

…New law in Saudi Arabia declares Atheists terrorists [Fox News Video]…


…New laws in Saudi Arabia declare that atheists are terrorists…

…New laws in Saudi Arabia declare that atheists are terrorists…

“A rash of new laws issued in Saudi Arabia aim to blot out all political dissent — and in one case defines atheists as terrorists. The series of laws began in January of 2014. At the end of last month, Human Rights Watch issued a report explaining that “a series of related royal decrees create a legal framework that appears to criminalize virtually all dissident thought or expression as terrorism.”

…Saudi Arabia declares atheists terrorists under new laws targeting citizens who ‘call for secular thought in any form’…

…Saudi Arabia declares atheists terrorists under new laws targeting citizens who ‘call for secular thought in any form’…

“Saudi Arabia has officially identified atheists as terrorists in sweeping new laws that threaten up to 20 years in prison for almost any criticism of the government or Islam.

The regulations place secular citizens who commit thought crimes in the same category as violent terrorist groups such as Al-Qaeda’s Yemen branch and Saudi Hezbollah.

Under the new decree by King Abdullah, Saudi Arabia will jail for up to 20 years anyone who fights in conflicts abroad – an apparent move to deter Saudis from joining rebels in Syria.

But the law also applies to any Saudi citizen or a foreigner residing in the kingdom that ‘calls for atheist thought in any form or calls into question the fundamentals of the Islamic religion on which this country is based.’

The laws have been denounced by human rights groups for making no distinction between religious expression and violent extremism.”

…Saudi Arabia declares all atheists are terrorists in new law…

…Saudi Arabia declares all atheists are terrorists in new law…

““Saudi authorities have never tolerated criticism of their policies, but these recent laws and regulations turn almost any critical expression or independent association into crimes of terrorism,” said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East and North Africa director at the HRW.”

…Atheists Classified As Terrorists Under New Saudi Arabian Laws…

…Atheists Classified As Terrorists Under New Saudi Arabian Laws…

“Those who swear allegiance to any party, organisation, current of thought, group or individual inside or outside the kingdom are also included in the provisions. The Muslim Brotherhood and various Al Qaeda factions are also among those on the list.”

“The legislation will address those who return with newfound training and ideas about overthrowing the monarchy.

Participation via forms of audio, written, visual media, social media, websites are all included in the definition.

Blogging for Al-Bab, Brian Whitaker writes that while the new laws might seem bizarre, “in Saudi terms it does have a certain logic. Since the entire system of government is based on Wahhabi interpretations of Islam, non-believers are assumed to be enemies of the Saudi state.”

“While the law cites violence as an essential element only in reference to attacks carried out against Saudis outside the kingdom or aboard Saudi transportation carriers, crucially it states that inside its borders, “terrorism” can be non-violent.

It can consist of “any act” intended to, among other things, to “insult the reputation of the state”, “harm public order”, or shake the security of society” – none of which the law clearly defines.”

…Saudi Arabia: New Terrorism Regulations Assault Rights [Human Rights Watch]…

…Saudi Arabia: New Terrorism Regulations Assault Rights [Human Rights Watch]…

“The new regulations come amid a campaign to silence independent activists and peaceful dissidents through intimidation, investigations, arrests, prosecutions, and imprisonment. On March 9, the prominent human rights activists Abdullah al-Hamid and Mohammed al-Qahtani completed their first year in prison, serving 11 and 10-year sentences, respectively, for criticizing the government’s human rights abuses and for membership in an unlicensed political and civil rights organization.

Two other human rights activists, Waleed Abu al-Khair and Mikhlif al-Shammari, recently lost appeals and will probably begin their three-month and five-year respective sentences soon for criticizing Saudi authorities.

On January 31, Saudi authorities promulgated the Penal Law for Crimes of Terrorism and its Financing (the “terrorism law”). The law has serious flaws, including vague and overly broad provisions that allow authorities to criminalize free expression, and the creation of excessive police powers without judicial oversight. The law cites violence as an essential element only in reference to attacks carried out against Saudis outside the kingdom or onboard Saudi transportation carriers. Inside the kingdom, “terrorism” can be non-violent – consisting of “any act” intended to, among other things, “insult the reputation of the state,” “harm public order,” or “shake the security of society,” which the law fails to clearly define.”

• Article 1: “Calling for atheist thought in any form, or calling into question the fundamentals of the Islamic religion on which this country is based.”
• Article 2: “Anyone who throws away their loyalty to the country’s rulers, or who swears allegiance to any party, organization, current [of thought], group, or individual inside or outside [the kingdom].”
• Article 4: “Anyone who aids [“terrorist”] organizations, groups, currents [of thought], associations, or parties, or demonstrates affiliation with them, or sympathy with them, or promotes them, or holds meetings under their umbrella, either inside or outside the kingdom; this includes participation in audio, written, or visual media; social media in its audio, written, or visual forms; internet websites; or circulating their contents in any form, or using slogans of these groups and currents [of thought], or any symbols which point to support or sympathy with them.”
• Article 6: “Contact or correspondence with any groups, currents [of thought], or individuals hostile to the kingdom.”
• Article 8: “Seeking to shake the social fabric or national cohesion, or calling, participating, promoting, or inciting sit-ins, protests, meetings, or group statements in any form, or anyone who harms the unity or stability of the kingdom by any means.”
• Article 9: “Attending conferences, seminars, or meetings inside or outside [the kingdom] targeting the security of society, or sowing discord in society.”
• Article 11: “Inciting or making countries, committees, or international organizations antagonistic to the kingdom.”

“Al-Qahtani and al-Hamid’s convictions included charges such as “breaking allegiance with the ruler,” “slandering the religiosity and integrity of the Supreme Council of Religious Scholars,” “sowing discord,” and “attempting to shake the internal security of the country by calling for demonstrations.” The new terrorism regulations classify several of these charges as acts of terrorism.

Other members of their organization, the Saudi Civil and Political Rights Association (ACPRA), are serving sentences for convictions on similar charges, including Mohammed al-Bajadi, Omar al-Saeed, and Abd al-Kareem al-Khodr. A jailed member, Fowzan al-Harbi, is on trial before the Riyadh Criminal Court on charges that include “participating in calling for and inciting breaking allegiance with the ruler,” “explicit libel of the integrity and religiosity of the Supreme Council of Religious Scholars,” “participating in setting up an unlicensed organization” – namely, ACPRA – “publishing details of his investigation,” and “describing the ruling Saudi regime – unjustly – as a police state.”

“On March 10, the SPA reported the conviction of another man, with a 10-year prison sentence and a 100,000 riyal fine ($26,600), for “engaging in following, saving, and resending inciting tweets on the social networking site (Twitter) against the rulers, religious scholars, and government agencies and his connection to people who call themselves reformists…”

Another human rights activist, Fadhil al-Manasif, who played a leading role in documenting abuses against demonstrators in the Eastern Province in 2011, is on trial for “sowing discord,” “inciting public opinion against the state,” and “communicating with foreign news agencies to exaggerate news and harm the reputation of the kingdom.”

And Riyadh-based human rights activists, Mohammed al-Otaibi and Abdullah al-Attawi, who came under investigation in April 2013 for co-founding a new human rights organization – The Union for Human Rights – face a new investigation based on their human rights activities.”

“While protecting public order and national security are recognized in international human rights law as legitimate purposes for limiting certain rights under narrow and clearly-defined circumstances, vague and overly broad legal provisions cannot be the basis for overriding a broad array of fundamental rights. Provisions of Saudi Arabia’s new terrorism regulations that deny any ability to exercise basic rights of peaceful assembly, association, and expression greatly exceed any notion of justifiable restrictions, Human Rights Watch said.

Commenting on article 6 of the regulation, one activist told Human Rights Watch on March 12: “Just talking to you now is considered terrorism – I could be prosecuted as a terrorist for this conversation.”


Apparently…we are witnessing a dictatorship in it’s death throws…Because this is an act of clear desperation.

If your regime’s standing is so fragile that it cannot stand up to any criticism…it is time to step aside, and admit that you are not fit to lead a nation.

Given the Saudi families penchant for extreme retaliation, against anybody under it’s control who does not kiss it’s behind and remain completely obedient…It is insane for anyone from that family, or from anywhere…to be pointing a finger at others [especially, entirely innocent others], and calling them “terrorists”.

The Saudi family’s pattern of behavior has far more legitimate claim, to being recognized as terrorism…than the actions of atheists, who speak out against said behaviors…who offer a legitimate resistance, to those human rights abuses.

Calling atheists “terrorists”, is an act of cowardice…it establishes that King Abdullah is out of touch with reality…drunk and crazed on his own power…desperate to keep hold, of power and wealth which never rightly belonged to him or his family, in the first place.

This is the same old, tired story, of the so called elite class against the rest of mankind…Some other man, always fancies themselves above the rest of us…with unquestionable authority and self righteous entitlement.

…It will be interesting to watch the Saudi family fall…though disturbing to contemplate, what might take their place.

…I have one more thing to say…It is a personal message.

…Or you can visit this video, here…