Category Archives: Human Sexuality As It Exists

The secret love life of Laura-Anne, aged 9¾…


Date: February 07, 2016

01) The secret love life of Laura-Anne, aged 9¾

“Laura-Anne Hanrahan is sitting on her doorstep, playing with a pumpkin as she describes how she felt when her boyfriend kissed her.

‘Tingly,’ she says, dreamily. ‘He used to come over and cuddle me and put his hands up my top. It used to feel cosy. I feel desperate to go up to him and say “Ben, why don’t we kiss any more”. It hurts so much that we don’t kiss that I want to rip my heart out and throw it away.’

Laura-Anne, from Siddick, a two-street village near Workington in Cumbria, is nine years old.

Next year she will become a star as the main character in a fly-on-the-wall documentary about the sexual awakening of Britain’s pre-teens, with her every thought pored over by television critics and sociologists. The makers of How To Fall In Love, due for broadcast by Channel 4 in the new year, spent two years following the primary school pupil and her friends as they discovered the opposite sex.

[…]

In one of the most contentious scenes, two 10-year-olds are seen energetically participating in the kind of kissing normally undertaken behind the school bike shed. It has prompted a debate about the ethics of using potentially vulnerable children as documentary subjects, with one parent saying he felt that his son had been ‘exploited and manipulated’.

[…]

Although the programme is not sexually explicit, Steven told The Observer he first had full sex when he was 11, and had been several times to the family planning clinic. All the children said they had their first ‘proper kiss with tongues’ when they were six or seven.

[…]

While many parents will be horrified at the thought of their pre-pubescent children engaging in any kind of sexual activity, some experts argue that we are all sexual beings, that children learn about touch and loving relationships from day one and that parents need to be comfortable talking about sexuality with their children early on.”

An old news story, from December 17, 2005…relevant in it’s admissions, I think.

Thought provoking…

I don’t personally believe there is anything wrong with the documentation of human sexuality, even if we are talking about the sexuality of prepubescent people…It exists for them, too.

It’s important for all of us [including the kids, themselves] to acknowledge it’s existence, and to understand it.

The only thing one would be inclined to be alarmed, or get offended over, in seeing this type of documentation…is if they don’t want to believe, that this very natural and real sexuality exists.

Truth be told…a lot of humans lose their sexual virginity, and sexually mate for the first time, before they hit full puberty…Sometimes they have sexual relations a number of times [usually with a peer], before they hit puberty.

This is the real world…And the real world is not some Walt Disney fantasy, where children are some caricature of angels divorced from human motives…A lot of children will choose to have sex prior to reaching puberty, because they personally want [and are biologically driven] to have sex…

…And as Judith Levine has said in the past…children [kids] choose to have sex, for most of the same reasons adults choose to have sex…

…They have the same, natural drive.

In addition…it is no mystery that males typically like to have sex, at very young ages…Our average sexual peak, is a mere eighteen years of age…Biology has made us inclined, to have a lot of sex in the several years leading up to this milestone in life.

Do people really presume that those years are wasted sexual arousal, which “means nothing”?…that they are a mistake of nature?…

It is believable, and very likely, that these years [roughly eleven on through eighteen, and into the twenties] are when a male is biologically at his best to reproduce [provided he has a social structure around him, to help raise his offspring]…Biologically, it may be when he is at his best, to weather the experience of being a father…And in times past, this was certainly true…when they didn’t expect us to live much past our thirties.

Todays western societies are so demanding…that they usurp an individuals natural right, to reproduce…and further still, their natural right to address their own sexual needs…Because that society believes, we all exist to perpetuate it’s own self sustainment…as opposed to our personal goals, needs and self sustainment…

Question is…how much havoc can a society wreck onto individual humans…before it starts wrecking havoc on itself?

The war against human sexuality, is a war against nature…It’s a war against humans being human.

If a child’s sexual behavior is so “unnatural”…then why is it so frequently happening, all over the planet?…Why do we talk about it so much?…Why are there so many programs to address [ie: punish] it?…Why is so much of the “sex offender” register made up of them?…

…It is quite perplexing that so many children would do these things by their own choice, if it were not part of their nature…Isn’t it?

Inside High School Sexting Scandal: 2 Teens Arrested, 20 Suspended…

……
….

Date: November 13, 2015

01) Inside High School Sexting Scandal: 2 Teens Arrested, 20 Suspended

“A sexting scandal that directly involved three students — two who were filmed in a sexual encounter and a third who recorded it — has led to the suspension of more than 20 teens at one high school.

A letter sent home this week to parents in the Smithtown Central School District in New York explained that “the district has recently been notified that two 14-year-old students have been arrested following an alleged off-campus incident.” It went on to explain that “the alleged incident, sexual in nature, was recorded and distributed electronically and through the use of social media applications.” The boy involved in the encounter and the boy who recorded it have both been charged with felonies for distributing child pornography, according to NBC New York.”


02) Sexting ‘Contest’ Scandal Sweeps High School

“A large-scale sexting scandal has taken center stage at one high school — forcing officials to cancel the football team’s last game of the season and putting some kids at risk of felony charges.

Earlier this week, officials at Canon City High School in Colorado learned that a large number of students — possibly in the hundreds — have been collecting and trading nude photos of themselves. “It got to the point of maybe a little bit of a contest, see who could collect the most,“ George Walsh, superintendent of Canon City Schools, told KOAA TV.”

“These are class 3 felonies in Colorado — a child under 18 taking a nude photo and sharing it, that becomes possession of child pornography, distribution of child pornography — so it’s not our job as a school system to sort all that out. That’s for law enforcement.

Walsh says the school collected evidence after sorting through student cellphones that were voluntarily turned over. “In 2015, I imagine not a day goes by where at least one school is not dealing with a situation in which minors have snapped photos of themselves in compromising positions,”…

The school’s first priority, Walsh says, is making sure that affected students get the help they need.”

Those darned teenagers!

What do they think they are doing, making all that “child pornography”, without a competent, certified “pedophile” present, to make sure it’s done right?!

I just don’t know what’s getting into these very horny kids, these days…

…It’s as if they’ve hijacked the “child pornography” industry […hobby, honestly]…

As a pedophile…I’m feeling very obsolete in the “child pornography” scene, these days…since I have nothing to do with it, at all…and these kids are leaving us “pedophiles” behind, without a thought…

…Whatever could be going on?

There’s no way possible, that kids below the age of eighteen years, could ever want to be in “child pornography”, or be having any type of sex…

…That just never happens, you know…

Must be a “pedophile” voodoo curse.

Oh, gosh darn it!…

…Chalk up another “child porn” score, for the kids…

….

……………………………………………

Full Documentary: Are All Men Pedophiles?

……
….

Date: May 17, 2015

01) Are All Men Pedophiles?

“This documentary explores the pedophilia hysteria and how all men are viewed as potential pedophiles. How did society come to such a conclusion and what are the political and social consequences?”

1:06:36 Rated NR

Directed by Jan-Willem Breure


I just found this a while ago, and decided I must post a link. This is a free to watch [with commercials] documentary.

I’m glad to see this has become available for free.

….

Rethinking “Consent”…


Date: March 25, 2015

…I’m a little fuzzy…

…I’m a little fuzzy…

I like this response…

…Though I’m sorry to learn of [slipperyshota’s] ordeal with sex trafficking.

“Consent” is honestly a complicated ordeal, when we live in a world that forces it to be complicated.

…In a better world than this one, “consent” would hopefully not be the hang up point that it is today.

I’m guilty of using the word “consent” a fair bit…but reading BFG’s post, I started thinking along the softer lines of “agreeable sex”…Which, in part, is why your post caught my eye and made me respond.

“Consent” as the holy grail it is today, is really quite unhuman…And it does not reflect well, on how we honestly live and interact with each other…It’s more of a lofty ideal, than anything else.

…At it’s worst…it’s an impossible barrier to navigate.

I do agree, however…with those who say, if you agreed with a certain type of conduct and broke your commitment knowing the consequences…then you are in some type of fault…

…But I also agree with those who say…In a better world, people would be far more open minded, than to box everyone into tight social restraints.

I don’t know if what I’ve said answers anything for BFG…But I kind of like it…It’s deep, and off the beaten path…I’ll probably post it on my blog…

Is This Child Pornography, By Legal Standards?…

……
….

Date: March 11, 2015

…[Provided for reference]The Power Of The Clitoris…

When looking into my last post, I happened upon something else by chance…and I just could not allow this to pass, without documenting and sharing it.

I noticed the section below an article, where they have pictures and links to other stories that “might interest you”…a graphic connected to an interview about the clitoris…

This graphic is used in the actual show footage, where this interview is taking place.

I want to explain something about “child pornography”, by it’s legal definition…and I think this is something, which most people are unaware of…

Anymore, in the United States, you can be charged and convicted of “child pornography” possession/production/distribution…even when there was no legal minor [let alone, actual child] involved, at any stage in the process. What they’ve expanded it to these days, includes content which merely purveys the idea, of a “child” [a legal minor] in a situation which stimulates the sexual arousal in anyone at all.

…Because of this, people who are of legal age have been tainted with the stigma of “child pornography”, due to things like wearing “schoolgirl uniforms”…or dressing up like a high school cheerleader, while in a porn shoot. Basically, if they do anything that conveys they are “imitating a child” [a legal minor], then they can be accused of participating in the creation of “child pornography”…This can even include such things, as having a naïve, “child like” look on their face.

In addition…we’ve seen the rise of a social sentiment, where in the inability to distinguish the legality of any “sexual” content, might get it branded “child pornography”…simply because you cannot tell by looking at it, whether all participants are of legal age.

…This is, admittedly, “thought crime” territory…As in, if “that” picture incites “those” thoughts in you, then in a case by case basis…you are guilty of “possessing child pornography”, because it is “an equivalent” to you.

…Don’t believe me?…Go do your own research, and find out just how convoluted “child pornography” law has become…Taken to it’s logical conclusion, you can barely even define, what is or is not legally defined “child pornography”, anymore…And there are many deep, dangerous problems in this.

What struck me about this graphic used here [openly, on the Huffington post website]…is that the model photographed could just as easily be a ten year old female, as it could be a twelve year old female…as it could be a fifteen year old female…as it could be a seventeen year old female…as it could be a eighteen year old female…as it could be a twenty one year old female…

How is any onlooker expected to determine?…And what exactly does anyone have to say about it, should someone grab a copy of that picture…pretend it is a teen, or pre-teen girl…and masturbate to it, fantasy style…because it adequately fits the individuals aesthetic requirement?

In the subjective, unequal quagmire “child pornography” law has become…how are we left denying, that this might be “child pornography”?

I don’t know that this isn’t a pre-teen, or a very young teen…Do you?

…She is clearly hairless, in such a way that emulates a pre-teen…She is also wearing what I might suggest, looks like underwear a young girl would be inclined to wear…Plus, she is posed in such a manner, that is sexually suggestive…And she is slightly pulling them down with her thumb, exposing a tiny bit of pubic area…

So…what, exactly, stops this from being “child pornography”, by legal standards, hosted and made available to the general public on the Huffington Post website?

In the legal world we are forced to live in, today…I see absolutely no way to make that distinction.

Now…reality is…that is almost certainly a female, of at least eighteen years in age…But notice how they think nothing, of the way they’ve packaged and presented this picture…It is vague, and it appeals in a very forward manner, to people’s natural attraction to the young…It appeals to the “barely legal” crowd…that crowd amongst us, who would…as soon as anything becomes legal and willing…

…Because the strict letter of the law means so very much, to what gives us all an erection…right?

…It’s never anything about the individuals, themselves…It’s all about those laws written by governments, what makes us all hot and horny about a situation…right?

If old statesmen [and stateswomen] telling us what we can, and cannot, get sexually excited over holds so much power over us…then why aren’t we all out humping law books right now?…Seems to me, visiting a law library should be as good as going to a porn store…right?

…Aren’t these the ultimate source of what drives us, sexually?…laws and permission from overlords?…

…No?…

If we can be honest, about the hyperbolic nature of my last five or six insincere sentences…then why cant we be honest, about what all else is going on here?

I defy you to prove to me, that Huffington Post is not distributing “child pornography” on it’s website…and to explain to me, why this entire set of circumstances [including the legal minefield] is okay…or not.

You see…it is all subjective…There is no right or wrong answer, as relates to the example given.

…The answer could just as easily be “yes”, as it could be “no”…Because we are not talking about an equally enforced, clearly defined set of laws.

…We are talking about a house of cards, a stacked deck…an uneven battleground…where “the undesirables” can be subjectively railroaded into prison…and it is all made to seem perfectly clear and correct…

…When it is anything but.

….

……………………………………………

Knowing the Cause…

Date: February 25, 2015

…Do you want to know?…

…Do you want to know?…

“If there were an oracle with the ability to tell you exactly what caused the pedophilia in you and could explain it to you in simple details, would you ask it?”

I’m at a loss, as to what I would do with this information if I had it. I don’t believe I could be scared of knowing it. I just don’t see what good it would do, to know it…Plus, if in the process I were endowed with some additional knowledge on how to uncommonly manipulate myself this way…I do have concerns, others might expect me to undergo such manipulation…whatever that may be.

“What if the truth is so horrible that you loose the will to live forever? Would you risk it anyway?”

I don’t see how this could happen. I mean…I don’t wish to re-tell the story of that first moment, where my homosexuality suddenly hit me…It’s late, and I need to go to bed…I’ve told the story many times…

I did not really even understand it, the first time I experienced it…There was no physical contact, of course…but I had a sudden rush of sexual attraction, complete with arousal, when one of my friends from school came over to play…I was about six or seven years old…It was spontaneous, and there was no sexual intent in what we were doing.

I’ve never seen any distinguishable difference between my own onset of sexual awareness, and that of any other human who just naturally discovered what they are attracted to sexually.

…And I reject the notion that anyone can impregnate a sexual orientation into you…I still more sternly reject the notion, that a traumatic sexual experience could ever make you want to repeat a perpetual cycle of trauma.

So, I am at a loss…to imagine what could possibly horrify me…

Nobody raped or touched this into me…It’s just how I am.

Because my orientation didn’t evolve where some people want it to be…some people claim it to have been “arrested in development”…Which is a kind of curious admission, that children are sexual on some level…

…But I disagree with the notion, also, that my orientation was supposed to evolve towards adults. This orientation has been around throughout recorded human history…At some point we have to relent, that this is a natural part of the human makeup.

Fresh Air: ‘Why Kids Sext’ Describes Nude Photos As ‘Social Currency’ Among Teens…

……
….

Date: October 15, 2014

…’Why Kids Sext’ Describes Nude Photos As ‘Social Currency’ Among Teens…

“In April, residents of Louisa County, Va., were shocked to learn of a sexting “ring” among the town’s teenagers. When Hanna Rosin asked teens from Louisa County High School how many people they knew who had sexted, a lot of them replied: “Everyone.” But what was originally characterized in the media as an organized criminal affair was soon revealed to be widespread teen behavior.

“I think we as a culture don’t know whether to be utterly alarmed by sexting, or think of it as a normal part of teenage sexual experimentation,” Rosin tells Fresh Air’s Terry Gross.”

“[The police] call the girls in and they think there’s something really, really wrong — something unusual and sinister happening right under their nose — that’s how the investigation starts. … But by the law any picture of a minor is illegal and so they just ask the girl[s] who they call in for interviews, “Well, do you know anyone else who has naked pictures on their phone?”

And everyone says, “Yeah! I know five people,” or “I know 10 people.”

And remember: This is a relatively small town so people are trusting the police officers. They all know each other. So then they call in five people and then they call in five people and then they call in five people and pretty soon the investigator has bins full of cellphones with pictures of naked kids that belong to teenagers. …

So they’ve moved from thinking this is sinister to realizing, within a few days, this is completely common.”

“On how these teenage girls felt about the boys seeing pictures of them naked

That’s what’s amazing to me that this is so common given what we all know to be true about teenage awkwardness. The girls would actually get around this. I mean, some girls are just into it. They look great, they look like the pop stars they see, they’re proud to send their pictures.”

Well…yes…

…Here we have another example of going straight to the source, of one of the sex abuse industries current pet hysterias…”sexting”…

…Yup…teenagers!

“100 kids in a high school, caught in a sexting ring”…

…As it turns out…they were into it…and it was their own thing…

The big issue here, is that some dirt bag published these pictures on a website…when they were expected to remain private.

“Sexting” is a home grown phenomena, created and maintained by teenagers [legal minors].

…It is not something which “pedophiles” are behind…despite that certain groups have created propaganda, which suggests otherwise.

…And, amongst teenagers…it is “completely common”…

So…legal minors are “victimizing themselves” by posing in, and creating, “child pornography”…

…Curious spin, huh?…especially in the face of raging, teenage sexual hormones…

You know…I want to be totally fair, and acknowledge that it is scummy for anyone to betray the trust of another…and I do think, something wrong happened in the case talked about…

…but it is ludicrous and inhuman, to fail in understanding that this is just teenage sexuality [and social culture], in the age of this type of technology.

It is despicable…that such a thing is criminalized.

I have to repeat myself again…and point out, that when left to their own devices…legal minors will, themselves, adopt and take over the “child porn industry”…

…because what they are doing…they like doing it.

Whether or not this deserves being called “child pornography”, is a whole other argument…But it’s good enough propaganda for the sex abuse industry…So, I’ll roll with their extremely broad definition, even if only to shove this reality back into their face…

…and expose what cretins they are.

It is time for this idiocy to end…I implore everyone…unite, and bring this tragedy born of intolerance and idiocy to an end.

Nobody should ever have their lives hindered or destroyed, because of others who wont tolerate their common and consensual sexuality.

….

……………………………………………

People Imply These Kinds of Things…


Date: July 16, 2014

01) Are Child Sex-Robots Inevitable?

01) Forbes: Original Article

“I asked the panel how society would deal ethically and legally with a hypothetical company that starts producing child sex-robots to satisfy deviant sexual desires.”

“Arkin said that while he doesn’t approve of child sex bots for recreational use, he’d like to see them used for research purposes. “Child-like robots could be used for pedophiles the way methadone is used to treat drug addicts,” said Arkin.”

“He added that he did worry about the possible creation of a black market that would offer the robots outside of a clinical setting.”

Should we be given sex toys [in this case, “child” robots] as sexual pacifiers?

People Imply These Kinds of Things…

…when they really seriously just don’t comprehend, what it means to be a pedosexual.

In the capacity implied, such a thing is literally nothing more than a sex toy…and sex toys are sex toys.

I’ve got nothing against sex toys, in theory…In fact, I’ve bought a few of them during my lifetime. But it was not because the toy itself was exciting to me. It was because the skin of my palms has become so leathery and coarse [from my line of work…not from chronic masturbation]…that I needed to explore other methods. Mostly, the toys proved to be horrible…or burdensome…and the novelty wore off quickly.

I’m not a fan of sex toys…and I’ve really got no fetish, involving them.

Sex dolls, I think, would be worth neither the hassle nor the expense.

As a novelty, it might hold a brief window of interest from me…But no matter how “life like” it might be…it is still lifeless.

These kinds of sex toys are for monosexuals…people who just want to experience the sensations of sex, without anything or anyone getting in the way of their experience.

Just like private masturbation…what is subtracted from these sexual experiences, is having someone you are totally into, responding to and experiencing your touch…The whole excitement of a companion experiencing the magic of sex, is just absent. This guts the experience, in my opinion, rendering it hollow.

To me, sex is not about being in heat…It is about having someone who willingly experiences your physical affection…It is about doing for them, what others wont…and in the process, expressing my own needs…Being in heat [if that even happens anymore], is only one catalyst.

Something that has no capacity to sense, appreciate or experience what I am doing for it?…That is not even interesting to me.

To my mind…sexual companionship is about needing someone, for whom you can make a meaningful difference through physical affection…You find your own satisfaction within theirs.

I cant speak for every pedosexual…but that is one major thing, which outsiders just don’t get about so many of us.

…They’ve robbed of us the ability to love another human being, in the manner which comes natural to us.

You can never replace that, by giving us “something to fuck”.

Some may claim I promote a romanticized idea of sex…but when you are a pedosexual like me, with my set of interests [I’m a true pedophile]…you understand, that how I explain it…is honestly the only way it could work.

They’re still kids…they still require kid gloves…You have to follow their lead and capacity.