There are various “legal terms” used throughout orthodoxy, and this short sharing focuses only on one aspect. The use of “legal terms” have a side to them that looks as if the system (including US Law-making and perpetuation of rigid laws) INTENTIONALLY seeks to wrong groups and individuals “served” with such terms. This report shares a few thoughts on this. Perhaps someone out there ought to explore MORE on this topic?”
01) Sam Harris Goes to Town on Islam and Political Correctness
“he covers areas such as why islam is bad, how isis is simply following islam in its purest form, regressivism/political correctness, charlie hebdo and self-criticism, the united states’ reliance on saudi oil, etc.”
“This is the refutation video towards sceptic llama’s video about Cart o’graph. I provide logical reasoning to the best of my ability when refuting this person. This is a response video :)”
In The Defense of Cart O’Graph 2:
[Raw Links Below]
01) David Thorstad, cofounder of NAMBLA, speaking at The Society for Psychoanalytic Inquiry in 2013
02) Full Video From The Start
“Liberals talk about the toleration of sexual diversity as if this were a nearly accomplished fact, yet the psychic characters of many remain dominated by sexual taboos. While these taboos are registered in personal life as anxiety and disgust, they are also manifest publicly in politics and the law. The law sanctions the continued oppression of sexual offenders by enlisting psychological categories of difference and subordination. Prostitutes, homosexuals, transsexuals, pedophiles and zoosexuals populate the fearful dreams of the American mind, while skillful propagandists exploit this fear to control our politics; mob-like persecution and criminalization of same-sex desire and victims of HIV almost passes for normal in many parts of the world, sometimes sanitized as “public health.” What accounts for the persistence of these modern sexual taboos, even after the liberation movements of the 20th century? Are psychiatric categories, like ‘phobia,’ relevant to understanding the problem? What forms might sexual emancipation take today? This panel brings together analysts, scholars and activists to examine and debate these questions from the perspectives of anthropology, critical theory, psychoanalysis and jurisprudence.
Erik Brodnax, Bernard Harcourt, R. Dennis Shelby and David Thorstad, Greg Gabrellas (moderator)
Educational objectives: At the conclusion of the program, participants will be able to: 1) Analyze the relation of sexual taboos and law from perspectives of anthropology, critical theory, psychoanalysis and jurisprudence; and 2) Compare different approaches to advancing sexual freedom.”
Aside from blind bigotry…I’ve never understood why NAMBLA founders [and leaders] have been so badly attacked.
They’ve always come off as decent, articulate, conscientious, intelligent and caring human beings.
Whatever other people are seeing…I have to believe, it is all in their own heads…and has nothing to do, with the objective world.
01) Dr. Jordan Peterson on Free Speech and Authoritarianism
“Published on Nov 21, 2016
University of Toronto psychology professor, Dr. Jordan Peterson, talks to NoneOfTheAbove’s Sam Sholli about his opposition to Bill C-16, free speech and authoritarianism.”
01) SELF-IDENTIFICATIONS, SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT, AND WELLBEING IN MINOR-ATTRACTED PEOPLE: AN
EXPLORATORY STUDY
02) Direct Download [PDF]
“A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts
by Brian Martin Cash
August 2016
ABSTRACT:
Most research on sexual attraction to minor children and adolescents has viewed this
phenomenon as a pathology, and has used clinical and forensic study populations. This study
seeks to conceptualize minor attraction as a sexual orientation, and uses a sample of minor-
attracted people recruited from the internet (N = 160). Participants’ sexual identities, sexual
attractions, disclosures, and wellbeing are investigated. Results indicate that minor-attracted
people have varied experiences, but common themes that emerged in these areas are discussed.
Regarding wellbeing, minor-attracted people in general had higher loneliness and lower self-
esteem than the general public. But positive disclosure experiences and having some level of
attraction towards adults were related to lower loneliness, and more accepting attitudes towards
sex between adults and children were found to be related to higher self-esteem. In general,
findings supported the conceptualization of minor attraction as a sexual orientation.”
