Does Anyone Have Thoughts On the Indiana Freedom Alliance?…

4 Replies


Date: January 07, 2019

01) Indiana Freedom Alliance

02) Pedocentric Misandrists and Miserotists and Their Unjust March to Dehumanize Pedosexuals

“Today, America is awash in a sea of pedosexual myths and hysteria largely originating with less then honest pedocentrics and miserotists serving in high level career positions, including law enforcement, teaching, child advocacy, and the nonprofit sector. They are counselors, therapists, outspoken critics, mothers and fathers, aunts and uncles. What is a pedocentric? A pedocentric is an adult (usually female) with pedosexual desires but choosing to live in denial. Pedocentrics have all of the desires, sexual urges and erotic affections for children, but instead of coming to terms with these natural and completely normal feelings, will choose instead to exercise a high degree of social deception and erotic restraint in order to mask this natural side they would rather not show to the public.”

They’ve had a YouTube channel for a while, also…Not sure if it’s still open.

One of the things I very much dislike about the “Heart Progress” fiasco…is that it casts a long shadow of doubt, on these new, slick looking websites that pop up out of nowhere.

All the same…I cannot say as my brief perusing of articles there, has left me with the impression that whomever is behind the website is in the wrong.

The header banner…”Live, Love, Play – Naked!”, with small children on it…could either be an attempt at triggering outrage…or just a bit of humor…

Honestly…I’m getting a sincere vibe, when I listen to these articles…

…Their mascot…”Indiana”…is very intriguing…

It’s clear they put some degree of research into their articles.

…And you know what?…I completely agree with this article…

The Complete Moderate’s Guide to Welfare…

Leave a reply


Date: January 07, 2019

01) The Complete Moderate’s Guide to Welfare

“Welfare reform is part of every politician’s speech, but what programs do we already have and how could they be improved?”

There’s a whole bunch of links related to this video, in the video description section.

If you are interested in checking them out, please visit the YouTube page.

FRONT SEXUEL…

1 Reply

ma_tv
….

Date: January 06, 2019

01) FRONT SEXUEL Channel

“TRUE MARRIAGE FOR ALL Pedophile Zoophilie Incestieux MAKE A NEW WORLD WITH A COMPLETE CULTURAL REVOLUTION! DEBARRASSER THE RELIGIONS DOGMATIC COUNTRY FRONTIER HYMN FLAGS ORDER MORAL SEX ect”

There is a new French video channel, which deals with issues many of us find important.

I don’t personally speak or read French…So, I’m not entirely sure what is explicitly being expressed in all of these videos…

A copy of the text used in these videos [possibly posted in the video description], would be very useful.

I’ll share the videos of this channel, likely salting them in, over the next month or two.

 ….
Sub-Blog Archive | M.A. Net

Warning: www.ibld.net Is No Longer In Trustworthy Ownership…

Leave a reply

….
IBLD Website

Date: January 06, 2019

Let it be known, I’ve removed the “International BoyLove Day!” [www.ibld.net] link from the EQF IBLD website.

This domain is now redirecting people to a malicious website.

It would be best for all who have links to the old International BoyLove Day! website, to remove those links.

I’m positive I have Dave’s IBLD website archived somewhere…I’ll look into rebuilding it, and putting it into the IBLD History section…Though, I can make no promises, on how quickly this will happen.

– Steve

 ….

Apple and iPhone are trash, Stock Is FAILING and Taking Us With it…

Leave a reply


Date: January 06, 2019

01) Apple and iPhone are trash, Stock Is FAILING and Taking Us With it

Apple does make garbage, yes…

I made the mistake of buying an iPod a few years back…the most robust and expensive one…

…That piece of garbage is falling apart on me…literally…

It’s been handled ultra-gently…and I’ve barely even scratched the surface, regarding how much usage I expected to get out of this thing…This was supposed to be a central part of my sound system, possibly for the next ten years.

It still functions, for the most part…I’ll say that much…but…

The state of this thing is disgusting…I’ll never buy anything form Apple again.

Mark Greif: ‘Afternoon of the Sex Children’…

Leave a reply


Date: January 05, 2019

01) Afternoon of the Sex Children

02) Book Fight Podcast – Episode 231: Mark Greif, “Afternoon of the Sex Children”

Cant say as the podcast is all that deep, regarding this piece of writing.

“Not long ago I took part in one of the conversations you’re not supposed to have. It turned on whether Vladimir Nabokov, author of Lolita, really desired underage girls. The usual arguments came out: Nabokov was a master of personae, and Humbert Humbert a game to him. Kinbote, analogous narrator of Pale Fire, didn’t make you think Nabokov loved boys. The late novels were Nabokov’s allegories of the seductions of aestheticism, which transfigures the forbidden into the beautiful; or moral paintings of our acceptance of crime, when crime is presented alluringly. So love of the wrong object becomes a metaphor for art, ethics, personality, and so forth.

I was reluctant to say that I felt these explanations were inadequate and even in bad faith. The trouble with Lolita is plainly its ability to describe what a sexual 12-year-old looks like. What her dress is like when it brushes her knees, what her toes are like with painted nails, how the color sits on the plump bow of her lips — the phrase for this is that it is “too real”; that’s the scandal. It continues to be the scandal fifty years after publication, and it will be a scandal whenever any adult acknowledges the capacity to upend his vision and see a child, protected larval stage of the organism, as a sexual object. The girl is still a child, only now she is a sex child. Yet this makes me feel Nabokov was not a pedophile, but something he is not credited with being — a social critic.

You, too, see it, or should. The trend of these fifty years has been to make us see sexual youth where it doesn’t exist, and ignore it as it does. Adults project the sex of children in lust, or examine children sexually with magnifying glasses to make sure they don’t appeal to us. But these lenses became burning glasses. The hips of Betty Grable melted and disappeared. The breasts of Marilyn Monroe ran off and were replaced with silicone. The geography of fashion created new erogenous zones — pelvic midriff, rear cleavage — for dieters starving off their secondary sex characteristics, and for young teens, in the convergence of the exerciser and the pubescent child. The waif and the pixie became ideal. Mama and daughter look the same again before the bedroom mirror — not dressed up in Mama’s pearls and heels, this time, but in children’s wear. The dream belongs to 16, or to those who can starve themselves to 16.

The critic Philip Fisher used to note that Lolita, tightly plotted as it is, repeats one scene twice. Humbert spies a lit window far opposite. Because he longs to see a nymphet, he sees one. The wave of arousal returns, its tide dampening him up to his knees. As he nears the climax, the form is refocused as an adult woman or man. Disgusting! But this is a simple inversion of a characteristic experience of our time. A man will see a distant form, in low-cut top and low-slung jeans, and think he is on the trail of eroticism; draw near, and identify a child. Revolting! The defenses against it continue the problem. The more a whole nation inspects the sex characteristics of children to make sure it is not becoming aroused by childishness, and slyly hunts around to make sure its most untrustworthy members are not being so aroused, the more it risks creating a sexual fascination with the child. However you gaze, to accept the fantasy, or to assure yourself you see nothing, you join in an abomination.”