Date: November 25, 2022
01) LINK
“Krystal and Saagar talk about new polling data showing the American people across party lines are overwhelmingly turning against large financial power centers.”
===
|
||
| …. |
Date: November 24, 2022
“Elon Musk is coming for YouTube next! According to a tweet with Mr. Beast he wants to position Twitter as a legit YouTube competitor, and is looking to pay content creators more than YouTube offers (how?) and is even trying to land the former head of YouTube Gaming to come to work for Twitter. Is Musk serious about taking on Google? And what about TikTok?” |
…. |
…..   |
||
|
|
||
| …. |
Date: November 24, 2022
“DC Comics is reportedly telling its comic book creators to leave Twitter and go use some hole-in-the-wall app called “Hive.” How fitting. If only DC Comics had told its creatives to stay off Twitter 4 or 5 years ago, things might have escalated the way they did…” |
…. |
|
….. |
||
|
||
| …. |
Date: November 24, 2022
“I feel let down and apologise if I have misled anyone” |
…. |
 |
||
Date: November 24, 2022
01) LINK
“Jon Stewart is a comedy legend who pioneered an entirely new way to deliver scathing but also funny commentary on the news. But now he’s apparently decided to piss away all the credibility he built up by interviewing and giving a virtual tongue bath to war criminals Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice, whom he allows to spew transparently false narratives about the American war machine with nary a peep of disagreement.
Jimmy and his panel of Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger and The Grayzone’s Anya Parampil discuss Stewart’s embarrassingly cringe-worthy performance.”
===
Date: November 24, 2022
01) LINK
===
Date: November 24, 2022
01) LINK
===
Date: November 24, 2022
01) LINK
Again…Notice how they actually singled out a tweet, when showing the banned individual where they “violated” terms, rules or policies?
They are supposed to do this…This is normal behavior, so that the banned can figure out why they were banned.
It is abnormal for anyone to get a permanent suspension [or account termination], over a first time offense…unless somebody positioned to inflict the penalty walked into this, with predetermined intent to banish you.
…I’ve seen some really awful things, twitter has been perfectly willing to take a light handed approach towards…many times over…And I’ve seen some really awful things, twitter refuses to take any action on at all…despite that they clearly violate terms, rules and policies.
Twitter refuses to enforce it’s own terms, rules and policies, equally across the board…Twitter refuses to protect anyone from abuse, who they deem an “unprotected” group.
Twitter openly chooses to allow and host dehumanizing hate speech, slurs and libel, against any legal, peaceful group of human beings, which it dictates are “unworthy” of empathy, or even just the most basic of anti-defamation protection.
With twitter, it is all a game of who’s team you are on.
Given that so many “trust and safety” twitter moderators are firmly in the “woke” camp…they side with, and act as the instrument of retaliation for, the people who abuse and defame on ideological “woke” grounds.
…Who even knows how many permanently banned people are out here, for whom their ban was transparently unjust.
They simply inflict it, and sweep it under the carpet…no accountability whatsoever.
…Then twitter has the gall to publicly boast about being “human rights and free speech” champions.
A lot of people [and growing numbers] know the ugly reality.
===
|
|
||
| …. |
Date: November 23, 2022
“The REAL reason Disney brought back Bob Iger as Disney CEO might just be to SELL the company off to Apple, something that’s been rumored for several years. This coming from Disney insiders who worked with Iger at the company, according to The Wrap. Will Iger be the LAST Disney CEO? Could be…” |
…. |
|
….. |
||
Date: November 23, 2022
01) LINK
“When a missile recently landed on a farm in Poland, killing two, reporters, pundits and other members of the establishment commentariat quickly looked to blame Russia, with one AP report citing an unnamed “US intelligence official” as proof that Russia was responsible. But that turned out to be untrue, and the AP was forced to issue a retraction. Yet the anonymous official who passed along the misinformation to the AP remains unnamed. Why? Why would the news agency seek to protect a source who knowingly misled them about a news story with the potential to dramatically escalate the Ukraine conflict, and possibly lead to nuclear war?
Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss the consequences of media outlets granting sources the freedom to lie with impunity.”
===
Our Love Frontier 