Date: April 04, 2023
===
![]() |
||
…. |
Date: April 04, 2023
“Jack Coe the faith healer who kickstarted a nation-wide faith healing tent revival before landing himself in jail for practicing medicine without a license would con hundreds of thousands of Americans out of millions of dollars. He built a small empire, packed out arenas, and traveled the US in the world’s largest tent – claiming he possessed the gift of healing and spoke words of prophecy during the uncertain times of the Cold War. Joining the ranks of Oral Roberts, A. A. Allen, and William Branham, Jack Coe helped create the blueprint that laid the grounds for the modern faith healing con used by many health and wealth prosperity doctrine preachers today. After working closely with Gordon Lindsay, editing the Voices of Healing Magazine, Reverend Jack Coe launched his own magazine, the Herald of Healing which reached over 300,000 members. Although he was exposed as a faith healing charlatan by Adon Taft of the Miami Herald, Pastor Jack Coe amassed a fortune while offering nothing but false hope and deception before the pastor died of polio at just 38 years old.” It’s shameless how people with the most amount of money and power, are always telling the least powerful and most poor to give them money. “Faith healers” are predatory frauds. === |
…. |
![]() |
Date: April 04, 2023
“The Manhattan District Attorney’s office sent a scathing letter to House Republicans Jim Jordan, James Comer, and Bryan Stiel on Friday, accusing the trio of “unlawful political interference” in their investigation of Donald Trump. This letter can be seen as a shot across the bow for these Republicans that they are engaging in illegal activity and could be brought on charges if it doesn’t end. Farron Cousins explains what’s happening.
*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.
On Friday, Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, via their general counsel, Leslie Dubak, sent a scathing letter to House Republicans, specifically Jim Jordan, James Comer, Brian Steele, three house committee chairman, who had previously asked the Manhattan DA’s office to turn over all of the evidence to come and testify and tell us every single thing that you have looked into regarding Donald Trump, which would not only be a violation of New York state law, but according to the letter sent by Duek, these three men engaged in unlawful political interference. Those are the three words that she used to describe their intimidation techniques to get the DA’s office to stop looking at Donald Trump. Unlawful political interference. But it’s that first word, unlawful. Unlawful is another way of saying illegal. Now illegal. For those of you who may not know means against the law. And if a District attorney’s office sends you a letter letting you know that what you’re doing is illegal, that is effectively a shot across the bow.
A warning that we see you, we see what you’re doing. We know it breaks the law. Don’t tempt us because that Manhattan DA DA’s office 100% has the authority to arrest these men if it is determined that they did break the law by attempting to intimidate the DA’s office. Let me read you the rest of the letter. Beyond the unlawful political interference part, as your are no doubt aware, former President Trump has directed harsh invective against District Attorney Bragg and threatened on social media that his arrest or indictment in New York may unleash, quote, death and destruction. As committee chairman, you could use the stature of your office to denounce these attacks and urge respect for the fairness of our justice system. But of course, these three men, especially Jim Jordan, they’re not gonna do that. They’re gonna do Trump’s bidding, even if they know that one, they have no jurisdiction to do a thing about what’s happening in the Manhattan DA’s office. And two, that even attempting to do so could be viewed as illegal. Now, there are federal statutes and there are state statutes regarding the intimidation of investigators, of prosecutors, of pretty much all public employees, which the Manhattan District Attorney is again, state laws and
Federal laws. A week ago, Glenn Kirchner, a former prosecutor legal expert, basically outlined both of those laws and said Donald Trump could easily be viewed as, as violating them. But I think they would all apply to these three men, you know, uh, uh, Jordan Comer and Steele as well. You do not have jurisdiction over an independent state prosecutor in New York. This is not a federal office. It does not receive federal funds. There is no federal government oversight whatsoever with this office. You, as members of Congress, have the power of the purse over the federal government, not over the state governments. So therefore, there isn’t a single thing that you have jurisdiction over with regard to this office. Therefore, any attempt by you to coerce the prosecutor to hand over all of the evidence, which has Bragg pointed out in his letter, uh, you know, a week ago, that’s a violation of state law, can’t do it, would be illegal. But that is what these men have done. And this letter from Duek, a Doak, excuse me, it is her saying, we can go after you. We don’t want to. That’s a lot of work. It’s, you know, probably another unprecedented thing. We’re already working on one unprecedented thing, so y’all better chill because if you push us, we will come after you.
Citation:
https://www.rawstory.com/manhattan-district-attorney/“
===
Date: April 04, 2023
“Piers Morgan is joined by criminal defence lawyer Aamer Anwar to debate whether Shamima Begum should have been allowed back into the country and to maintain her British citizenship.
Piers begins by agreeing on the outcome of Shamima having her citizenship removed and not being allowed back in the UK, as she made the decision to join ISIS at the age of 15 and has not shown much remorse for her actions since then.
Aamer disagrees and believes that she was a victim of grooming and so should be allowed to return. He however adds that she should be questioned about her time in ISIS to gain information about the terrorist group as he feels there is much benefit the Government could gain from obtaining this intel.”
Difficult situation…I’d say she definitely does not have a right to return…If her children were still alive, I’d say bring her back for their safety…but prosecute her.
===