“A new Star wars rumor says that Lucasfilm boss Kathleen Kennedy might get ousted in 2025 if she doesn’t have a new Star Wars movie in theaters by then. No, for real this time. She really might. Maybe. I don’t know. It’s all rumor. If not 2025, then maybe, possibly, definitely she’ll be gone by 2030! Also, Lucasfilm is supposedly set to announce three new Star Wars movies at Celebration and the Indiana Jones Disney+ is canceled. Or something.”
“Old computers and technology aren’t made to last forever. Let’s go over some of the common problems old laptops, desktops and mobile technology are beginning to face thanks to the cruel passage of time!”
No violence present…No history of violence…Not a prior criminal in the house [aside from the invading police, themselves?].
…These are nothing more than murderous bastards, who think they have license to murder anybody they please.
Illegal images, regardless of what anyone might presume about them, will never under any circumstances rise to the level of justifying critically injuring anyone, snuffing out anybodies life, or depriving anyone of their freedom, property and resources.
There is no rational or sane logic, that leads to any of those things.
“Briahna Joy Gray weighs in on Democrats’ discourse over whether President Biden should be primaried.”
They’ve been doing this as far back as I can remember…
…There Will Never Come a Time when democracy is not “in peril”, nor when You and Your Issues are not entirely marginalized out of public policy debate.
…This Happens Every Single Fucking Time They Come Looking For Votes, Without Exception…
There is no sane reason to continue following along with this.
Biden is just another bandaid, on the road to full national collapse…[so was Trump, by the way, and a long list of previous U.S. presidents]…
…That is the truth of it all, and why “business as usual” must be rejected, if we have any hope for a future worth living in.
“Kari Lake lost her election again this week after the Arizona Supreme Court rejected nearly all of her claims (six out of seven, to be exact.) But she didn’t let that stop her from getting on social media and claiming that she secured a massive victory because ONE of her claims was sent for review to the lower court. In addition to her lie, she also suggested that she was going to “burn it” to the ground, which could be perceived as a threat against the state. Farron Cousins explains what happened.
*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.
Kari Lake has lost the Arizona election for governor of the state once again, as the Arizona Supreme Court struck down six out of these seven claims that she had made in her lawsuit. So basically they told her, you’ve got nothing. There’s no evidence to back up anything you said. You lost the election, please let it go. But to hear Kari Lake tell the story, you wouldn’t think she lost. You would think based on her response, as well as the response of other conservatives like Lauren Bobert, that Kari Lake just secured a massive victory. Kari Lake got on Twitter, and this isn’t even the craziest thing she said, but this is one of the things she said. She said, they have built a house of cards in Maricopa County. I’m not just going to knock it over. I’m going to burn it to the ground.
Okay? That that sounds totally normal and cool. Not, not crazy at all, Kari. So, so please, by all means, continue tweeting, things like that because it makes you look like a totally normal, rational, well-balanced person. Yes, that is a thing. Um, here’s the thing. She lost. You’re a loser. You’re continuing the grift because, you know, if you fall out of that spotlight, then you disappear in Republican world, basically. But when I said she’s lying to her friends on social, social media, here’s what I mean. As I said, the court struck down six outta the seven claims that she made. The one claim that the Supreme Court sent back down to the lower court was, Hey, double check that the signature verification was accurate. Like, that’s it. It wasn’t saying throw these out. It was just saying, do your due diligence, double check, make sure all the rules were followed, not look for anomalies, not we think there’s fraud.
It was just make sure everybody did the, did it the way they were supposed to. I mean, the, the, the court actually says if Lake can prove votes af uh, were affected in sufficient numbers to alter the outcome of the election based on a competent mathematical basis to conclude that the outcome would plausibly have been different, not simply an untethered assertion of uncertainty. Otherwise, the claim that was originally dismissed was properly dismissed. So Kari Lake has to go back to that lower court and prove mathematically that somehow the signature verification was wrong and there was enough votes to whatever lake like it’s not gonna happen. Because if she had that evidence, she would’ve presented it when she first filed the lawsuit and it first got tossed because the judges said, you have no evidence to support any of your claims.
So here’s what she put on social media. After, of course, the ridiculous burn it to the ground post, she said, huge AZ Supreme Court rules in favor of Carrie Lake forces lower court to look at signature verification issues. Nope, Nope, that’s not what happened. The State Supreme Court told the lower court, Hey, y’all make sure everything was okay, Carrie, if you can go back to court and you prove mathematically that something was wrong, then maybe we’ll take a look at it again. They, they did not say that they’re gonna force the lower court to look at anomalies. No, that’s, that’s actually your responsibility. It’s your burden of proof to bear. But as I said, it didn’t stop there. I’m going through a Twitter feed right now. Carrie Lake War Room, which is run by Carrie Lake’s team, uh, tweeted that out with a message, uh, Twitter user DC Draino, who’s a big conservative guy, tweeted it out with like the red flashing light emoji.
And then of course, you had Laura Bobber who tweeted Big Win for Election Integrity. The fact that signature verification is a controversial topic is ridiculous in the first place. Who, who said it was controversial? Lauren? That’s, that’s not a thing that happened. That’s something you created in your head. And this isn’t a huge it, well, technically the whole ruling is a huge win for election integrity because they didn’t allow a lunatic to just toss out the results because she’s a sore loser. Grifter, Carrie Lake is gonna lose again, which will make this what, the sixth or seventh time.
“This is Senator Jason Rapert. Don’t worry, I can’t get over his name either. He’s a self professed Christian Nationalist and a United States politician. A suit was brought against him by the ACLU, The Satanic Temple, American Atheists, and others for violating the rights of his non-christian constituents. You know you’ve messed up badly when that group of organizations is coming after you.
In this video, he’s doing a show with Michele Bachman where they both badmouth “socialism” or at least this nifty socialism strawman they built. They don’t seem to understand we live in a partly socialist country already- and you know who was the biggest socialist of all? That one guy Jesus.
There is some good news about Jason Rapert. He lost the election for Lieutenant Governor, but he’s a long way from being silent. He’s still pushing back against attempts to stop women’s rights from being stripped in Arkansas and everywhere in the US. We need to be watching this guy and listening to what he has to say. People like him should not be allowed to stay in our government. He makes it perfectly clear he does not stand for every citizen in this country, only the ones who think exactly like he does.”
“In last night’s House Rules Committee hearing, Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) slammed certain books stocked in school libraries that have come under fire by conservatives.”
Yes…I am totally okay with those books…
You should read them, before expressing an opinion on them.
Are you afraid they’ll give you too hard of a boner, if you look inside of them?…
…Afraid you’ll discover that you are gender queer?…
…The one with boys at summer camp sounds like darn good reading.
Queer kids have a right to positive representation of people like themselves!
…and parents are commonly awful, at giving their queer kids a well rounded sense of themselves in this world…So, no…I would not leave this type of question up to parents.
They are often the source of suffering, for queer kids.
Straight kids have a right to positive representation of queer people, too!
Our Love Frontier 