Date: May 27, 2019
01) Noam Chomsky: I would vote for Jeremy Corbyn (EXTENDED INTERVIEW) – BBC Newsnight
“Noam Chomsky is not just one of the world’s most famous academics, he is also one of the world’s most famous supporters of the political left. Evan Davis talked to him about Donald Trump, populism in Europe and Julian Assange.
Newsnight is the BBC’s flagship news and current affairs TV programme – with analysis, debate, exclusives, and robust interviews.”
Date: May 27, 2019
01) Many Tulsi Gabbard and Bernie Sanders Supporters Are Ready To Go Rogue
“The Plan B thing we have to get organized if that’s actually going to be a thing. And commiserating about the medias collusion with Joe Biden might get you some clicks and views but at the end of the day if you’re not also doing videos about how this process is rigged from start to finish then you probably shouldn’t be doing media at all.”
|
||
| …. |
Date: May 27, 2019
“DETROIT – On Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Robert H. Cleland issued an order setting a 90-day deadline for state lawmakers to revise Michigan’s unconstitutional Sex Offender Registry Act (SORA). The order comes nearly three years after the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled in August 2016 that portions of SORA that lawmakers added in 2006 and 2011 – which imposed sweeping geographic exclusion zones where registrants cannot live, work or spend time with their children, extensive reporting requirements, and automatic registration for life without due process or the ability to appeal – are both ineffective and unconstitutional, and cannot be applied retroactively to those convicted before the changes went into effect. The district court had previously found other parts of SORA violated registrants’ First Amendment and due process rights. Read this U.S. District Court order: |
…. |
|
…..TAP-Net Website | Sub-Blog Archive |
||
|
||
| …. |
Date: May 26, 2019
Hello, Mario… “Hey your a pedo sympathizer right? I have questions.” I am a pedophile BoyLover. “How do you think pedos get laid do they just go up to a 7 year old ask em out to dinner then wait till the third date?” Where it comes to intergenerational relationships of that nature, discard the stereotypical models of “adult sex”. The dynamics are not the same, and the manifestations cannot be entirely the same. That said…in a civilization which understands, values and respects intergenerational love…the scenario of an adult taking a child out to dinner, or to places where they can spend time together, would not be particularly strange or ill viewed. Most modern cultures would have to experience radical changes, before any supportive social framework existed, which these types of relationships could honestly exist in. “What if the child doesn’t understand what their asking?” This is a failure on the part of culture and civilization. Children should not be forced into sexual ignorance… …If sex is not hidden from them, and they see the activities in culture…whenever they seek it out…they will have something on which they can base a decision, to self elect into some form of sexual activity. ” What if they don’t consent?” Then it is an abuse. “Is there an age limit for children or it’s ok no matter what the age.” That is a very deep, sometimes volatile, question…since nepiophilia [the sexual love of infants and toddlers] is also a factor. As I see it…this primarily hinges on the tolerance and temperament of the civilization. Some are intelligent and progressive enough…to see things for what they are. It’s little known or talked about today…but attitudes to sex [and sexual touch] were radically different in some regards, only a century back…and earlier. Mothers and other family members orally sucking a small boys penis [to calm him, etc.], was once considered a total non-issue…simple child rearing…The practice has been recorded in writings, and even paintings… …In France…there was once a time when the family structure was such that…a young [10…11…12…13…] boy’s first sexual companion would normally be his own mother…and this would commonly last until he took on a wife, and/or moved out of the home. These were pragmatic social decisions, the larger culture saw nothing shocking or horrendous about. Contrary to the “we learned better, and put a stop to it” opinion…these practices were a casualty of sharply changing moral outrage…Previously, they worked out quite splendidly in their cultures…People who morally object, like to cast a dark shadow on such practices, and act as though they were on par with slavery, or something…They also like to carry on, as if these things “must have been traumatic, and obviously not enjoyable”…There is no reason for this conclusion, other than ignorance and bigotry. The first example I just gave, easily falls into the behavioral realm of nepiphilia…even if the people doing it, were not strictly nepiophiles. Is it possible for civilization to afford sexual intimacy to children of all ages?… …Yes…it unquestionably is…It already has been, in the not so distant past. Should there be an age cut off?… …This is a question every civilization has to confront, debate, wrestle over, and make a decision regarding. “Do you think pedos get the right to do things to children that potentially aren’t old enough to have had ‘the talk’?” Well…pedophiles are people who are attracted to children in the roughly six to twelve age range…Generally speaking, if sex is not hidden from children in the culture…then they would be old enough to have some sort of “the talk”. Nepiophiles would be the more complicated discussion to be had…provided a culture agrees “the talk” is such a vital thing, for every single form of sexual encounter. If the culture is more lax, and has an eased mind about things like simple, gentle touch…then does “a talk” really hold so much importance, when that is all the child ever experiences? Hebephiles [who are attracted to people going through puberty] and ephebophiles [who are attracted to young people in their teens, who’ve passed through puberty], are generally accepted as being attracted to people who are likely to have had such a talk. As a side…I’ve never understood the whole ridiculousness surrounding “the talk”…a generally uncomfortable encounter, with someone you’ll never have sexual relations with…who you don’t really even want to have such a discussion with…quickly dumping a bunch of “sex facts” onto you, and never bringing the topic up again… …as if this is how human sexuality even should be approached. It’s pathetic and ridiculous…as are cultures who think this is how things should be. “Do you also support rape culture and believe rape should be legal?” No, and no… The timing of your questions is kind of interesting, as I just recently [within the last week] wrote something relevant to this, for my “In Self Defense” series. In all honesty…I am a pragmatic moderate…I am against forced celibacy…I am against forced sexual activity…I am against forced sexual ignorance…I am for self elected, sexual freedom. Many people will say that “children cannot understand sex”… …And of course they cannot understand it, when the very same people making such claims, are among the people making certain children never see, or learn anything about sex… This is an unnatural state of being…which takes naturally sexual beings, and makes sexually dysfunctional beings out of them. I strongly recommend reading the Growing Up Sexually archive, which catalogues a very large collection of historical examples, where children and teens have been both expected and tolerated, to be engaged in sexual activity. Childhood sexuality has been far more tolerated throughout history, than most people imagine. When we take an honest look at it…the claims of “trauma and injury” fall flat. “This is not meant as an attack I’m just curious to how the mind of a pedo support guy works.” I appreciate that…Thank you.  
|
…. |
|
||
|
||
| …. |
Date: May 26, 2019
|
…. |
 – Atheist Media Links
|
||
Date: May 26, 2019
01) How an internet mob falsely painted a Chipotle employee as racist
“Just about every week we see the same story. Someone takes a jittery smartphone video of a white person caught in the act of doing something that’s labeled racist. An army of online commentators mobilizes. The video goes viral. And the person in the video is publicly shamed, often losing a job or being ostracized by the community. His or her name becomes a hashtag for hate.
The circulation of these racist outrage videos is so common that they’ve become the online version of background noise. The social scientist Eugenia Siapera says they often trigger “ambient digital racism” — racially toxic online posts from ordinary people that are so commonplace they no longer shock.
Yet there is another part of this story that is rarely told because it is not as common. What happens when you are falsely accused of being a racist in a video? How does your life change after you’ve become a racist meme? How do you handle your own outrage?”
|
||
| …. |
Date: May 25, 2019
“Adolf Hitler learns the truth about pedophiles, MAPs, and child sexuality.” Risita reacts to myths regarding minor attraction: |
…. |
| Sub-Blog Archive | M.A. Net |
||
Date: May 25, 2019
01) Betrayed
“Donald Trump promised to protect American jobs. He lied, and workers across Wisconsin have lost their jobs. When Bernie Sanders is in the White House, the corporate greed behind the Shopko closures, Kimberly-Clark layoffs and Foxconn scam will end.”
Date: May 24, 2019
01) Are We Living in an Ancestor Simulation? ft. Neil deGrasse Tyson – Space Time
“The idea that our reality is a simulation is not as far-fetched as you may think. Many philosophers, scientists and tech-billionaires are seriously considering not just the possibility but the high probability that our civilization may be a program being run by another, more advanced alien civilization.”
If by some chance we are living in such a simulation…I just wanted to go on record, saying whoever determined the social plight of sexual minorities in this simulation, are absolute creeps.
Date: May 23, 2019
01) Milo: Forbidden Conversation
“I should start by saying that Milo is definitely now on the list of those who no one acceptable socially should ever speak to, which I suppose is one of the reasons why I’m talking to him. I want to know what happened to him over the last few years, in his words, and I don’t really give a damn if that’s politically incorrect. I also plan to post clips directly from this discussion on Facebook this week. We’ll all see (all who are interested) what happens when that occurs.
Milo’s a hard man to categorize. Part journalist, part performance artist, part agent provocateur, part comedian and wit, Yiannopoulos is a man of immense and complex self contradiction. He’s half-Greek and half-Irish, but is know as an Englishman to the Americans with whom he has communicated extensively. He’s gay, and Jewish by descent. He married to his long-term boyfriend, an African-American man, in Hawaii, in 2017, but faces frequent accusations of racism. He is—or was—strangely attractive to young American Republicans, and completed a successful and controversy-ridden tour of US universities in 2016-2017. For at least two years, he was one of the most well-known internet celebrities, let’s say, on the political front, and caused more uproar than any other single person that I can think of.
In my view, for what it’s worth, Milo was such a figure of inner contradiction and outer controversy that I believed his time was numbered. Nonetheless, the circumstances of his demise were unpredictable, I would say (and that’s in keeping with his apparent destiny). After revealing details of his early sexual experiences at the hands of a decades older priest, whom he refused to name, he stated that he was an active participant in the events, and that such occurrences were far more common (and far more consensual) than people were willing to admit. I don’t think he ever recovered from the controversy that those comments generated.
In case it has to be said, and no doubt it does, I believe that what happened to him was absolutely unforgivable, and it would seem that he has come to share that opinion. Our conversation centered mostly around these issues, which I believe to be of wide general relevance. Hence the video.”
I guess our question on how open minded Jordan Peterson is regarding man/boy love, was answered…
…He is not open minded, at all…and doesn’t really stray from the typical narrative and sexual superstitions.
Milo doubles down on his retreat from the “it was un-harmful and positive” stance…using excuses which are lame…
…”The clip was edited, and distorted” [I didn’t take that away, watching the original interview]…”he worded himself badly”…”when he made the statement, he only had his own experience to go by…but, over the last two years, his late teenage step son has made him realize the horrors of it all” [because he couldn’t imagine that kid doing what he did]…”the paternal element to older men and younger boys in gay culture, is completely fucked up“…Milo “wishes gay therapy worked”…
Milo claims to hate his own sexuality…
…The talk about “losing your ability to be a father” [actually not true], was a bit intriguing…as well as that of homosexuals tendency to end up working in the church as “nurturing shepherds”…
I think the most worthwhile point, prior to my falling asleep…was the talk about being targeted…why and how he got taken down.
…Not sure if I’m going to bother listening to the rest.
Milo did expound a bit [reluctantly] on the “young male with older male” pairings in gay culture…which, while a mixed bag, I did think it was insightful…saying how the older male cares for and orients the younger male, because the younger males parents, etc. cannot, or will not.
I did have a lot of appreciation, for how it was acknowledged by both Milo and Jordan, that certain issues cannot be honestly discussed in public, without being punished and ostracized for it.
