MyPillow CEO’s Election Lies Could Soon Become ILLEGAL In His Home State…

Leave a reply

Date: March 09, 2023

01) LINK

“A proposed bill in the state of Minnesota would make spreading lies about elections in the state ILLEGAL, which would come as a huge blow to MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell since that is his home state. The legislation is still in the early stages, and Republicans are obviously objecting strongly, but there really is a good legal case to make these kinds of lies that Lindell has been spreading illegal. Farron Cousins explains what’s happening.

*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.

MyPillow, C E o, Mike Lindell could be in big trouble in his home state of Minnesota where production for MyPillow is based. If a new piece of legislation actually becomes law, because this new piece of legislation would make it a criminal offense to spread lies, which includes lying about the validity of voting in the state. Now, there’s a couple caveats here. It doesn’t outlaw all lies about an election. So pretty much up until 60 days prior to an election, a guy like Mike Lindell would be able to go out there and say all of the crazy things that they want to say about how we should melt down the voting machines and turn ’em into prison bars because you can’t trust the software. So those lies would be okay until you hit that 60 day before an election mark, at which point they would become misdemeanor offenses.

But there’s another caveat to that as well. You would have to, the state would have to, to bring charges against somebody, prove that the intent was, of course to disenfranchise voters. And that might actually be the point where Mike Lindell doesn’t get held criminally liable for the election conspiracies that he continues to this day, to spread the legislation is necessary. And while I disagree, uh, with those caveats, I, I think that’s kind of a bit ridiculous like an election. Lies and election lie doesn’t matter when it happens. Their goal is to prevent misinformation from disenfranchising voters. And we have seen people across the country, a lot of Trump supporters, uh, prosecuted for this in recent years. You know, the robo calls from, uh, Jacob Wall and Jack Berkman, you know, trying to convince people that either you’re not eligible to vote or maybe your polling place may have changed.

So don’t go to the place you usually go, uh, whatever it is, whatever kind of disinformation is being spread. And I’m not saying that’s what Berkman and Wall did. I’m just using those as examples of misinformation that would be prohibited. Um, that’s pretty much what they’re trying to stop. They do not want false information about who is eligible, what you need in order to show up to the polls or where a person votes. They wanna stop all of that because that has become a common practice, you know, trying to confuse voters by feeding them misinformation, but posing it as a possibility rather than a fact. See, that’s where they kind of skirt the line. And by they, I of course do mean, uh, Republican operatives. They skirt the line by not exactly saying you are ineligible to vote, but by saying you might be ineligible to vote. This law, of course, would

Put an end to that as long as you could prove that the intent was to stop people from voting. Now, in Mike Lindell’s case, his intent is actually not, I believe, uh, to prohibit people from voting or to prevent people from voting. Lindell has even said like, we have to overwhelm the algorithms by all showing up to vote. So he’s probably in the clear, which in my opinion is a bit unfortunate because the lies that he spreads still damage the sanctity of voting here in the United States. He is cast doubt on the systems and whether he intends to or not, we’ve actually seen hard evidence that shows that some republicans, mostly the MAGA folks actually do sit out now because they believe these lies that the system can’t be trusted. So even though they’re hurting their own people, if that’s not his intent, he can’t be held criminally liable for it.

Which again, is a little weird because you still have the same effect, but since you didn’t mean to do it, it was just accidental, suddenly you, you can get away with it. And if it’s more than 60 days prior to an election, you get away with it no matter what. Even if it is your intent. Um, again, the law is necessary. It’s very clumsily written, so hopefully they go back and make some addendums to it. Cuz as it stands right now, it’s probably not gonna do anything at all to stop voter suppression. And more importantly, it won’t stop any of the election lies that Trump and his followers have been pushing.

Citation:
https://www.rawstory.com/minnesota-election-lies/“

===

Trump’s Lawyers Whine That Prosecutors Have TOO MUCH Evidence Against Him…

Leave a reply

Date: March 09, 2023

01) LINK

“Donald Trump’s lawyers are now whining about the fact that prosecutors in New York have too much evidence against him and that they don’t have enough time to go through all of it. This is just another delay tactic from Trump’s legal team, and it shows that they have had to get creative in order to avoid getting sanctioned by judges with their delay attempts. But arguing that there’s “too much” evidence of wrongdoing by your client is never a good move, as Farron Cousins explains.

*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.

Lawyers for the Trump organization that are preparing for that massive trial that’s supposed to be coming up in October where Donald Trump, Donald Trump, Jr. Eric and Ivanka all have to stand trial for the, uh, alleged fraud that took place at the company. And now his lawyers are trying to argue in front of Judge Arthur Gerron that by God the prosecution just has too much evidence against our clients that we don’t even have time to go through it. So judge, you’ve got to extend the trial date. We can’t be ready for October because there’s just so much evidence against our clients. Like, wow, kind of shocked y’all have all this and you know it, it takes a lot of time to go through these documents, but how much time see in their specific request to the judge, which by the way is nothing more than a delay tactic.

And the reason they’re using this as their new delay tactic is because their other delay tactics have been smacked down by the courts and they’ve actually been threatened with sanctions if they continue using those same tactics. So they had to come up with something clever, they’re like, okay, what if we just say that the evidence is so crazy overwhelming that we don’t even have time to look at it all and we need more time? Not exactly the argument that you want your lawyers to make, by the way. You don’t want them to walk into court and be like, wow, I didn’t realize y’all had this much dirt on my guy here. It’s gonna take me a while to go through it cuz wow. Um, yeah, kind of admitting that. Holy crap. It’s a little more intense than we thought. So as I said, let’s look at the numbers.

Let’s, let’s see how long it would actually take. Four Trump’s lawyers and their legal teams, cuz it’s not just the lawyers to go through the documents. They said it will take one reviewer up to 11,000 hours to review roughly 275,000 documents. He noted that a single reviewer on average can look at between 200 and 400 documents in an eight hour workday. So if we’re looking at 275,000 documents, that’s a lot. It’s a lot of evidence. They’re not wrong. And they say that one person, one single person can look at between 200 and 400 documents per day. Let’s take their low number, right? Let’s assume they’ve got slow readers working for ’em. So only 200 documents a day. That’s what they said. Trump’s lawyer said, is the minimum 200 a day for one person? So one person reviewing all of the documents by themselves would take 1,375 days. So yeah, I mean if you only have one person working on the case, you’re not gonna be able to have it ready by

October, which is when it’s supposed to happen. So yeah, I agree with that. But you don’t only have one person working on the case. It say for example, if you had 15 people reviewing documents, which almost 20 years experience working at a law firm, that’s about average. Okay? So I know firsthand that you will have more than one person looking at these documents. 15 is kind of the minimum. So if you had 15 people reviewing these documents at a minimum of 200 per day or at only 200 per day a piece, which is what his lawyers say they can do, you’d have it knocked out in 91.6 days, which means y’all be ready to go. By the second week of June, you’d have all the documents reviewed.

So if you’re ready by the second week of June and the trial’s supposed to start in mid-October, you have July, you have August, you have September, and then you have October. You had then have four months to go through and craft your defense, work on your statements, get your witnesses. That is actually more than enough time for a case that you’ve already been working on for months and again, nearly 20 years experience working in a law firm. I’ve helped work on cases in the past. I’ve gone through documents and lawyers don’t sit there and read every single word and mark it up and make notes on it. Typically, the documents will initially be going to the staff. They will mark up what they would consider to be the hot statements, the hot pieces of evidence that will then get vetted by a team of paralegals who will then work with the attorney to figure out what’s real and what’s not.

Citation:
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-org-fraud-evidence-massive-11000-man-hours-to-read-2023-3“

===

Goosebumps Author DIDN’T KNOW About Changes?! Is Goosebumps Getting Censored or Not?…

Leave a reply

Club_Diamond
….

Date: March 09, 2023

01) LINK

“Apparently, Goosebumps author R.L. Stine has NOT censored his books, nor did he even know about the possibility of them being censored for “sensitivity.” However, The Time UK insists it’s still happening. So what’s going on here? Is Goosebumps getting censored or not?”

===

 ….
…..

Elon Musk DRAGS Twitter Employee Publicly. Later Apologizes…

Leave a reply

Club_Diamond
….

Date: March 09, 2023

01) LINK

“Elon Musk has stepped in it again. The Twitter boss seemingly mocked a terminated Twitter employee for asking if he still had a job. After some back and forth, it turns out the guy was disabled and was even lauded by the UN. After apologizing, Musk admits that Twitter isn’t the place for any kind of in-depth, good-faith discussion. So basically, nothing has changed since Musk took over Twitter?”

Elon should also apologize, because it’s been six months [or more?], and where is this committee that’s supposed to restore falsely suspended accounts?

It seems Elon has not done dick, to correct the gross misdeeds of previous twitter.

They’re saying the platform is worse now?

===

 ….
…..

False Prophet Uses NUH UH Defense…

Leave a reply

Atheist_Media
….

Date: March 09, 2023

01) LINK

“Pastor, supposed prophet of god, and televangelist Nathan French claimed Trump would win the election in 2020. When his prophecy failed, he came up with creative ways of blaming everybody but himself for his failure. Not only that, but he came out swinging when he claimed he raised somebody from the dead. He’s also claimed to regrow limbs. The two claims faith healers are famously supposed to never make. Of course none of these miraculous things have been caught on camera. I’d certainly be filming if I was about to resurrect someone or regrow a limb. I’ll let you decide why false prophet Nathan or any of his MANY witnesses didn’t pull out a phone.”

In order for Trump to be “the world president”…there needs to have been an election…and votes cast…

…None of this has happened…Not even in the USA.

===

 ….
Atheist_Media_SB_Archive – Atheist Media Links