Date: February 06, 2021
01) LINK
“Saagar Enjeti reacts to Trump supporters abandoning Ted Cruz and predicts what this means for the future of the GOP.”
===
Date: February 06, 2021
01) LINK
“Krystal Ball analyzes the post-Trump Republican and Democrats parties.”
===
|
||||||||||||
| …. |
Date: February 06, 2021
Match 1: Ganymede & Boxie Hathaway VS Nigel O & Tom O – 79% Match 2: Bliss Ransom VS His Tormentor – 68% Special Match: Royal PITA Match 3: Viamund, Dave Haven, Yure GonnaGetIt, feinmann, Mason GoreCheese, Hyacinth, King Fabio, Ronald Bump – 100% Main Event:
Match 4: Mic ElGross VS Steve Diamond – 65% SHOW HIGHLIGHTS:
|
…. | ||||||||||
  |
||||||||||||
===
Date: February 06, 2021
01) LINK
I’m honestly sorry to see this happening to you guys…
…and while I’m not going to throw it in the faces of anyone, that virtually nobody has been there over the decades to stand up for us MAPs, while this literal same thing has continued to happen to us…
…I will say, I’m pleased to see those who’ve actually been able to break into some level of prominence, are finally starting to address this constant problem of unjustified censorship and banishment from the public square.
It’s a shame that it took them personally being targeted, in order for them finally to get more aggressive about this…but, the push back grows.
That is a good thing.
===
Date: February 06, 2021
01) LINK
===
Date: February 06, 2021
01) LINK
“The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 17
Repressive Tolerance Series, Part 1 of 4
We live in a crazy world today that seems to have gone off the rails. That’s because it is being driven by a broken logic, and, for all the flaws on the right, that broken logic is centered in the no-longer-tolerant left. The logic of the left today is overwhelmingly rooted in a single essay published in 1965 by the neo-Marxist philosopher Herbert Marcuse. That essay is “Repressive Tolerance” (https://www.marcuse.org/herbert/publications/1960s/1965-repressive-tolerance-fulltext.html). The thesis statement of this essay can be boiled down to “movements from the left must be extended tolerance, even when they are violent, while movements from the right must not be tolerated, including suppressing them by violence.” This asymmetric ethic has been the heart and soul of left politics in the West since the 1960s, and we’re living in the fruit of that catastrophe now.
To help people understand this vitally important and intrinsically totalitarian essay and its relevance to our present moment, James Lindsay walks the listener through Marcuse’s “Repressive Tolerance” in a four-part lecture series. In this series, he reads the essay in full and attempts to make clear how it is the logic underlying the present moment. The goal is to explain the essay as Marcuse would have understood it, in his own context, and to show how his own logic has become dominant and the monster that he believed he was fighting.
In the first part, Lindsay begins by framing the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory to give background on Marcuse. He also explains that Marcuse seems to be attempting to give a solution to Karl Popper’s famous “Paradox of Tolerance,” which was provided as an aside in his 1945 book The Open Society and Its Enemies, which analyzed how fascism can arise and overtake liberal societies. Marcuse’s answer to this conundrum is that a “discriminating tolerance,” a “liberating tolerance,” must be practiced that offers favoritism to the left and actively suppresses the right, as he defines them (from a perspective of Critical Theory). Join Lindsay as he contextualizes and then brings the first portion of this essay to life, and stay tuned for Parts 2, 3, and 4 to come!”
===
Date: February 05, 2021
01) LINK
This is the MAP positive album that was released in 2020, which made the tyrannical net nannies lose their minds. It’s honestly really good.
You should check out John’s other music available…there’s some great stuff there…I love his Anthology Vol 1 [Will there be a Vol 2?].
My music collection has grown by 22 tracks today…and quite the pleasure it is proving to be!
===
Date: February 05, 2021
01) LINK
“To most people, Sen. Bernie Sanders’s Inauguration Day mittens were just a meme, but one San Francisco high school teacher says the public is missing the broader point.
In a recent op-ed, Ingrid Seyer-Ochi said Sanders’s outfit was an example of white privilege, one that was on full display during the swearing-in of President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.
“What did I see? What did I think my students should see? A wealthy, incredibly well-educated and -privileged white man, showing up for perhaps the most important ritual of the decade, in a puffy jacket and huge mittens,” Seyer-Ochi wrote in the San Francisco Chronicle.
Citation:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/san-francisco-teacher-calls-out-sanders-white-privilege“
===
|
||
| …. |
Date: February 05, 2021
“Niklaus Wirth said Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs. But programs are more than that. They are ubiquitous in modern life, but only a tiny minority of the population know how to program. Programmers, coders or developers are therefore seen as the most rarefied of individuals – disconnected from society yet with enormous influence and power. This lecture examines what programming is, who invented it, and how it is changing to better represent the needs of modern society. A lecture by Richard Harvey The transcript and downloadable versions of the lecture are available from the Gresham College website: Gresham College has been giving free public lectures since 1597. This tradition continues today with all of our five or so public lectures a week being made available for free download from our website. There are currently over 2,000 lectures free to access or download from the website. |
…. |
 |
||
Date: February 05, 2021
01) LINK
Boogaloo Movement:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boogaloo_movement
This article explains why the Boogaloo movement is looked upon as being a domestic terrorist initiative.
I have to say [especially in light of Jimmy beating this horse to death], I’m surprised Jimmy has still not done the most basic of investigation into this movement, instead letting one singular unknown who claims to be “a Boogaloo Boy” represent the movement.
I did some looking into this movement quite a number of years back…and what I was finding on their own website, confirmed that people’s fears of them being domestic terrorists were warranted.
Why is Jimmy hanging so much on this one guy, and this chance interview he had with him?
I was really disgusted with the way Jimmy treated the guy in this interview [I think he has the original unlisted or private]…That whole interview was destroyed by Jimmy, when it should have been something far more productive.
Yes, yes…when a larger body is threatening smaller groups, they can join on common ground and fight back…
…But how do you justify joining with groups, who think it’s fine to kidnap and murder other people [including legally elected officials] based on ideological differences?
How do you even get to a point, where you can invest enough trust in such people…that you’d actually trust them to guard your own back?
Being entirely serious…as a homosexual pedophile…even just as a homosexual…or an atheist…I’d be constantly anticipating a bullet in the back of my head, anytime one of them was outside of my own view and had the opportunity.
===
