Twitter Flags Marjorie Taylor Greene For Hateful Content…

Date: July 26, 2022

01) LINK


“Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has once again run afoul of Twitter’s rules, this time by posting “hateful content” about a transgender doctor at the Department of Health and Human Services. Greene repeatedly deadnamed the doctor, calling her by her former male name, and then proceeded to create a disgusting hashtag for people to use. Twitter could have prevented this a long time ago, but they didn’t want to ruffle conservative feathers. Farron Cousins explains what happened.

Citation:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/marjorie-taylor-greene-twitter-flag-transgender-biden-b2126027.html

*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.

Twitter has once again, been forced to flag Marjorie Taylor green for posting hateful content on their platform. This time by dead naming a doctor that happens to be the, uh, assistant secretary for health in the department of health and human services. Dr. Rachel Levine in her tweets, Marjorie Taylor green, repeatedly referred to Dr. Levine as Dr. Dick Levine. Of course, the name before Dr. Rachel Levine transitioned and Twitter did not take it down because they said, quote, this tweet violated the Twitter rules about hateful conduct. However, Twitter has determined that it may be in the public’s interest for the tweet to remain accessible. So I’m going to read the offending tweet, the offensive tweet. Um, I’m gonna read her hashtag this is all coming from a sitting member of the United States house of representatives. Again, referencing Dr. Rachel Levine from the department of health and human services. We must do everything we can to prevent Dr. Dr. Dick Levine’s preteen, hashtag weenie chop. Now that I think about it as Dr. Dick Levine advocates for gender affirming care for minors, has he undergone the hashtag weenie chop himself, or is he just pushing this on children? It’s in the public’s interest for this tweet to remain up? So say if the rulers of Twitter,

There are so many offensive things in what Marjorie Taylor green said in this tweet that I, I don’t even know where to begin. Of course, the dead naming, you know, calling her a he just because you frigging feel like it. This is sick and it’s disgusting, and nobody is more obsessed with gender and pronouns than these Republicans. You know, I love how they always try to paint the liberals, the progressives, everybody, anybody on the left is trying to be too woke and being so concerned about people’s gender. Actually, we’re not

Tell us what to call. You will call you that. No problem. It’s the Republicans that love to talk about it. It’s the Republicans that love to intentionally call people by their dead names, call people by the wrong pronouns intentionally when it’s just as easy to use the pronouns they want to use. It’s not an issue, but Republicans like Marjorie Taylor green are so bigoted and so hateful that they make it an issue. They’re the ones that are the fragile little snowflakes, but the hashtag weenie chop thing, man, I, I, I don’t even, I, I don’t even, I don’t even know, just such a vial and disgusting piece of trailer trash that we have serving in the house of representatives, because that’s where this kind of behavior belongs. This belongs on the Jerry Springer show. And yet here it is in Congress from Marjorie Taylor green, she’s pure trash.

She is absolutely the trashiest person in the United States house of representatives. And that’s saying a lot considering this is a house of representatives that includes people like Matt gates and Lauren Bobert green has managed to be trashier than all of them combined, even more so than ghosts are, but, but Twitter’s leaving it up, you know? Oh, they’re telling you it’s hateful. Sure, sure, sure. But you know, it’s in your best interest, maybe Twitter thinks it’s in our best interest so that we can see what a hateful bigot Marjorie Taylor green really is. Maybe I, I, I suppose that’s of interest to the public, but here’s what gets me about this. This is coming from her official at rep MTG Twitter account, her verified congressional account because that’s the only one she has her personal account was banned long ago for spreading misinformation. But Twitter, let her keep this one.

And this is what we get for that. Twitter could have put an end to this back then. I mean, look, you’re talking about an account run by the same person. If she’s filled with misinformation and hatefulness on one account, you don’t think she’s just gonna turn over and do that on the other, cuz you only ban one, but not the other one. That’s idiotic ban this piece of trash from Twitter. This isn’t a freedom of speech issue folks”

The twitter a-holes pull “rules and policies” out of their own asses, on a whim…depending on how they want to play anything in the moment.

There is no consistency…There is no logical pattern…They’re just cut loose to do as they please, without consequence.

If they don’t feel like it, then they refuse to enforce their own rules…even when they know they are supposed to…even when they know it makes them extreme, smug hypocrites.

===

Capitol Rioters Cry Like Babies As Judge Sentences Them To 3 Years In Prison…

Date: July 26, 2022

01) LINK


“Two men who had previously pleaded guilty to participating in violence at the Capitol during the January 6th riot openly wept in court last week when they were each sentenced to 44 months in prison. The men begged for leniency, but the judge told them they were already getting a lenient deal as some of the charges against them had been dropped. Farron Cousins explains why we shouldn’t have any sympathy for these people.

Citation:
https://www.rawstory.com/j6-cody-mattis-james-mault/

*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.

Last week, a pair of capital rioters who had pleaded guilty all the way back in April were finally sentenced for what they did during the capital riot. And as they begged for leniency from the judge, the two men openly wept. Now these were younger men. Um, I believe let’s see what their ages were. Uh, one of them was 30. The other was 29. So prime of their lives, right? Everything in front of ’em, they were in their twenties. Of course, when the riot happened and they’re sobbing in front of this judge begging him, please do not send us to prison. We would like leniency. And the judge had to inform the duo that we’ve already given you leniency. We actually dropped some of the more serious charges against you that would’ve resulted in a longer prison sentence. So you’re both getting 44 months in jail, right?

Four months shy of four years, a piece, and only a handful of rioters have actually received longer sentences than that. So these men, these young men now up there at the top, not the very top, but towards the top of total amount of prison time received by any capital riots. And of course, as I said, they sobbed, they wept because they were so, so sorry for what they’d done that day. But the judge, in addition to informing them that they already got leniency, reminded them that no, you’re not actually sorry for what you did. And I will say the men, you know, mention, we got young kids, we’re gonna miss the next four years of their lives. Now, eh, you should have thought about that before you stormed the capital guys. Sorry. It sucks for the kids. Not necessarily for you because here is what these two men did as part of the mob that stormed the capital on January 6th, 2021, these two guys, according to the court filings led the mob that rushed the police officers basically incapacitating the officers.

They then crowd surfed their way to the top, to the front of the line, where they then used pepper spray to take out several police officers. They maced the cops. These two men did according to these court filings. So I have no sympathy for you. Honestly. I don’t even know if I have sympathy for the kids, cuz it’s probably better for them that you’re not a part of their lives now because as the judge pointed out, you’re not actually sorry for what you did. Cuz the judge then read from the men’s own text messages, where they were laughing and congratulating each other after successfully storming the capital, right? And the days that followed, they were texting back and forth congratulating each other for

It. Now those don’t seem like the actions of an individual. That’s truly sorry for what they did that day. And that of course is why the judge refused to give them any further leniency. You bragged about it. You patted each other on the back for it because you were pleased with what you had done that day. Okay. There, there is no mistaking that they were happy. They were texting their families by the way, as they were in there boasting about what was happening, talking about how exciting it was. So I don’t care. You can save your crocodile tears. You can save your excuses about missing the next four years of your kids’ lives. You should have thought about that. You’re not sorry about what you did. You’re sorry that you’re having to pay a price for it. I have no sympathy for any of these capital riders. I don’t care about their situations at home. I don’t care about who is being left behind as these people go to prison because this is what these individuals who participated in the capital riot deserve you, amazed police officers. And I guarantee you, you’re the kind of people who at least some point in your recent history have said blue lives matter. but you’ve shown that you don’t actually mean those words. Do ya? So don’t shed any tears for these capital rioters folks. They’re finally getting exactly what they deserve.”

===

New York DA Was Too Scared Of Losing To Prosecute Donald Trump…

Date: July 26, 2022

01) LINK


“One of the prosecutors that left the Manhattan District Attorney’s office earlier this year has come forward saying that new DA Alvin Bragg was too focused on how they could lose the case against Donald Trump to bring charges. The fear of losing, the prosecutor said, is why no charges ended up being filed in the case. This is a complete dereliction of duty for Bragg, as Farron Cousins explains.

Citation:
https://www.rawstory.com/manhattan-da-backed-off-indicting-trump-because-he-was-worried-they-didn-t-have-enough-evidence-ex-prosecutor/

*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.

Earlier this year, as we know, two of the lead investigators slash prosecutors that were working with the Manhattan district attorney’s office abruptly resigned after it became clear that the new district attorney who took office earlier this year, Alvin brag was not going to issue criminal charges against Donald Trump. Well, this past week, one of those, uh, attorneys who left mark Pomerance actually appeared on a podcast where he explained finally months later, why Alvin Bragg’s team didn’t wanna file those criminal charges against Donald Trump, uh, for the, you know, alleged financial fraud that was taking place. Now, before I read the reason that he gives us, let me just make it clear Pran. And the other attorney who also left, made it clear that outgoing da Cyrus Vance was just, as they put it days away from filing the criminal charges against Donald Trump. They had laid out their case.

They had everything they needed, and they were certain that criminal charges could in fact be successful. They were about to do it. Then Alvin brag came in and refused to, and here in mark Palmer’s own words is why he and the new team were focused on the risk that we could lose the case. It’s very hard to take somebody who has not been exposed to those facts on a trip through the capillaries of the financial statements in a meeting or even a meeting or two, the devil was really in the details and the details couldn’t be explained in kind of short form. Ultimately the da, the incoming da brag and the team were not comfortable going forward. So did we do a bad job of laying out the facts? Did, did they not hear what we were saying? Were the facts too complicated to explain in the format that we were using?

They don’t know because there’s no real answers given, but as Palmer is clearly saying here, like we had it all and we laid it out and we explained it to you, but maybe we did a bad job of explaining it. Or maybe you just didn’t understand. Maybe you thought it was just too weak and you were gonna lose. Oh, and you didn’t want that to be your first action as district attorney. I understand that you got a political career to think of. So to hell with getting justice here in the United States, I wanna advance my political career. So here’s the thing. This investigation at the DA’s office in Manhattan, of course is still ongoing, right? There’s still the possibility that criminal charges could be filed. I think it’s very unlikely that this would happen. You of course have the attorney General’s investigation in New York, but that is only a civil matter. She cannot file criminal charges in it. So what now? Well, for one, I think there need to be broader calls, uh, for Alvin Bragg to be removed from office. But more importantly, I know some of the best lawyers in this country, I’ve worked with them for nearly two decades. I

Have interviewed a majority of the living members of the national trial lawyer hall of fame, and in personal and professional conversations with these individuals, some of the best plaintiffs, lawyers, lawyers in the country, they’ve all told me the same thing. Sometimes they will take on cases. They will spend millions of dollars investigating cases and bring it to trial that they know they’re not gonna win, but they still give it their all, they still put all the effort into it. They put all the money into it, which by the way, they don’t get back when they lose. And they do spend millions investigating cases like this, and they’ll take it to trial. And they’ll tell me before, they’re like, I know we’re not gonna win this. The evidence is weak, but we do have people that have been injured and by God, we’re gonna fight and we’re gonna do everything we can.

And sometimes they do win those cases. They feel are unwinnable. A lot of times they don’t. But the important thing is that they don’t stop trying, even when they know they can’t win. Even when they go against the biggest corporations on the planet, they still do it to fight for justice.”

===

What If We Live in a Superdeterministic Universe?…

….

Date: July 25, 2022

01) LINK


“Today we’re going to try to save reality – or at least realism. However this rescue effort has a price; one that you may not be willing to pay. Your very soul, or at least your free will, is on the line.”

I’m going to pretend that I understand all of this…

…Just don’t ever ask me to repeat any of it! 😉

….
SPACE ARCHIVE | FRONTIER ARCHIVE

Odessa port missile strike. Orban warns collective west. Boris throws a grenade. Update 1…

Date: July 25, 2022

01) LINK


“Moscow reveals target of strike on key Ukrainian port.
A military vessel and a stockpile of Harpoon missiles were hit during Saturday’s attack, the defense ministry has said

Odessa port missile strike. Orban warns collective west. Boris throws a grenade. Update 1
Topic 629”

===

The Truth About Ukraine SLIPS OUT On CNN…

Date: July 25, 2022

01) LINK


“CNN offers 24 hours of programming every day, but not a whole lot of uncomfortable truths, so it was noteworthy when CNN host Becky Anderson asked her guest, Iranian-American academic Mohammad Marandi, about increasingly close ties between Russia and Iran despite Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and Marandi gave her a double-barreled blast of honesty in response. He explained that Iran has not actively supported Russia in the Ukraine War, but has its own interests that it will pursue and that the United States has plenty of blood on its hands as well.

Jimmy and America’s comedian Kurt Metzger discuss the surprising revelation of actual truths on CNN and why such rare instances so important to highlight.”

===

Marjorie Taylor Greene Claims She’s The Victim Of A Hate Crime…

Date: July 25, 2022

01) LINK


“In a video posted on social media this week, Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene claimed that she was the victim of a hate crime because her bigoted sign outside her office keeps getting vandalized and no one is going to jail for it. Greene clearly has no idea what a hate crime actually is, but she apparently thinks that hating something is all it takes. Farron Cousins discusses this ridiculous situation.

Citation:
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2022/07/marjorie-taylor-greene-rages-shes-victim-hate-crime/

*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.

Marjorie Taylor green loves her little signs that she hangs up outside of her office, but she hates with a passion. The fact that these signs continue to get defaced and she is still furious over the fact that the capital police have allegedly identified the vandalizing. But the DOJ is refusing to prosecute the individual for ruining Marjorie Taylor greens. There are only two genders sign. So Marjorie Taylor green decided recently to put up a new sign and call out this democratic staffer on the sign itself for being the defacer of the sign, which of course that signed then got defaced. So after this happened, Marjorie Taylor green puts out a video where she says the following, you wanna know what happened? Another sign got taken off the wall. They can’t take the fact that there’s only two genders, male and female. They’ve been attacking this sign. Tim HEK chief of staff for Jake Austin, Claus. I’m sure Jake doesn’t get awards like this for actually having a great voting record. She said, showing off an award, she happened to be carrying. They attack this because they hate my faith. They hate my religion and they hate the fact that I’m a woman. The department of justice is not going to prosecute them.

So are you trying to imply that this is some kind of a hate crime that literally calling you out for your bigotry, which is why you put the sign up in the first place. It has nothing to do with your religion because your sign actually says, trust the science, like there’s only two genders, male and female trust the science. It doesn’t say my religion says, so it actually said, trust the science. So your own defense of your bigotry undercuts what your sign already said, which would mean it would not actually in fact be a, be a hate crime.

So I’m not exactly sure what point you’re trying to make, but you’re trying to make this a religious issue when it clearly is not show me in the Bible where it says there’s only two genders that transgenderism cannot exist or does not exist. Show me in the Bible where it talks about transgenderism. Can anybody show me that dancer? Of course says, no, you can’t. I’m sure there’s some conservatives right now trying to, oh, well it says that, nah, it doesn’t actually address the issue of being transgender. Does it now? No, it doesn’t. You can look all through that book front to back top to bottom left to right, right. To left, whatever you want to do, but you’re not gonna find it in there. So no Marjorie, this is in fact not a hate crime. And even though it is filled with bigotry, what you are doing by putting the sign up in the first place is also technically not a hate

Crime, but you are acting out of hate. You’re acting out of spite because you put this sign up because the Congress member across the hall from you happens to have a Chan, a transgender child. That’s why you did it. You did it because you hate them. So if we’re gonna talk about hate, if we’re gonna talk about violence against other people, let’s talk about the implied violence by what you’re doing, forcing that parent to see this sign every day, knowing that the person across the hall from them hates who their child is for no other reason than pure blatant bigotry. That’s what’s happening here. Marjorie Taylor green. Oh, and if you wanna wonder why, or if you want to know why, excuse me, why the DOJs not gonna prosecute this. Even though they, of course seemingly have identified this individual, it’s not worth the time.

It would literally cost the department of justice. Thousands of dollars to prosecute this individual for misdemeanor, vandalism of a sign whose value is not enough to even secure any kind of sentence that would come with any kind of prison time. Like you probably couldn’t even put this person in county jail for a day based on this crime. So the DOJ would lose a ton of money. Us taxpayers of course would lose a ton of money if they decided to prosecute this individual. If you don’t like your sign, getting to face, quit putting the sign out there. But we all know you secretly love it, which is why you do it in the first”

That poor girl!…

…Someone is interfering with her being a complete asshole.

===

Trump Begged Wisconsin Legislator LAST WEEK To Overturn 2020 Election…

Date: July 24, 2022

01) LINK


“According to Robin Vos, the Republican Speaker of the Wisconsin state assembly, Donald Trump talked to him last week and asked if he could overturn the state’s 2020 election results. More than 600 days have passed since that election, and Trump is STILL trying to overturn the results – even as his efforts to do so are looking more and more criminal by the day. Farron Cousins explains what’s happening.

Citation:
https://www.businessinsider.com/robin-vos-trump-urged-wisconsin-speaker-decertify-biden-win-2022-7

*This transcript was auto-generated. Please excuse any typos.

Robin Vos, the Republican speaker of the Wisconsin state assembly told reporters this week that Donald Trump actually reached out to him last week, asking if he wouldn’t mind going ahead, you know, overturning Wisconsin’s 2020 election results. 20 months after that election took place. As of today, it’s been 625 days since the 2020 election. And as recently as last week, Donald Trump was still reaching out to people in power like Rob and Vos asking them to overturn those results. Even as we have the January 6th committee revealing all of these potential crimes, that Trump may have committed in his efforts to overturn the election. And he’s literally still doing it like this guy just doesn’t give a crap. he’s just digging that hole deeper and deeper. And I gotta be honest. You kind of gotta admire it, right? The guy knows at this point, he’s got nothing left to lose.

So why not just go all in and keep trying to illegally overturn the results of the 2020 election? So what happened in Wisconsin is that, uh, in early July, the Wisconsin state Supreme court did rule that absentee ballot drop boxes were somehow unconstitutional. Um, the ruling is definitely wrong. Um, because the state has the authority to determine how they run their elections. If they wanna put an absentee ballot Dropbox in front of literally every single person’s house they can do that. You that, because that’s, what’s in the real constitution, not, not, not state constitution, the, the big one. So, uh, Wisconsin Supreme court definitely filled with idiots much like our United States Supreme court, that decision of course is going to be appealed because again, um, it takes, it takes a very simple mind. I’ll I’ll I’ll, I’ll say it that way. That’s the nicest way to say it in order to say that, Hey states, even though you constitutionally have the right to do whatever the hell you want in your elections, we’re saying that this particular thing that you decided to do was somehow unconstitutional. It makes no sense at all. It makes absolutely zero sense. But based on that ruling from earlier this month, Trump made the call to Robin Vos and said, Hey, Robin, here’s what happened? he didn’t say it like that, but I like to picture him in my head say it like that. So how’s about because of the Supreme court ruling, you go ahead and overturn the results of that election. Now, it’s also important to remember that Wisconsin is still apparently carrying out an audit

Of the 20, 20 election, even though they got the preliminary report months ago from the former Wisconsin Supreme court justice, who said, yeah, I can’t find any fraud at all, but I, I guess I’ll keep going. And then Donald Trump threatened Robin Vos and said, maybe I support your primary challenger. So Vos approved to keep the audit going. Even though it had basically already finished and said, there is no fraud. So it’s still going, even though it had finished and there’s no fraud and they can’t find any fraud, but Vos did it because Trump threatened to endorse his primary opponent. And Trump has still come out and endorsed his primary re opponent, uh, a lot of stupidity happening with these Republicans up in Wisconsin. And it’s all because they don’t know how to please Trump. Like they, they just they’re confused. They don’t know what to do anymore.

Do we, do we keep doing what he tells us, even though we know that it’s not gonna do what he thinks it’s gonna do. Like, am I allowed to say no? When he tries to get me to act UN constitutionally, I don’t even know anymore. So Trump comes out after this conversation with boss and he goes to truth, social and says, this looks like speaker, Rob Vos, a long time professional rhino, always looking to guard his flank will be doing nothing about the amazing Wisconsin Supreme court decision. The Democrats would like to sincerely thank Robin and all of his fellow rhinos for letting them get away with murder, even though right, even”

===

NPR Turns Against Ukraine!…

Date: July 24, 2022

01) LINK


“Ukraine has long been considered the most corrupt nation in Europe, and was widely recognized as such by American media outlets – right up until Russia invaded and suddenly Ukraine had to be “reimagined” as a paragon of democracy and a plucky underdog in the fight for freedom. Now that the Ukrainians appear likely to lose the war, however, mainstream outlets like NPR are rediscovering Ukraine’s rank corruption and reporting the truth again – but unfortunately too late to stop the tens of billions of dollars in military aid that’s been shipped off.

Jimmy and America’s comedian Kurt Metzger discuss the curious timing involved in NPR’s rediscovery of Ukrainian corruption.”

===