01) Jeff Sessions Revives Universally Hated Law: Civil Asset Forfeiture
“Attorney General Jeff Sessions is slowly but surely taking a wrecking ball to the few areas where President Obama’s attorneys general made progress. This week he announced his decision to unilaterally undo progress made with respect to one of the most tyrannical policies in existence: civil asset forfeiture.
01) Waking Up with Sam Harris #89 – On Becoming a Better Person (with David Brooks)
“In this episode of the Waking Up podcast, Sam Harris speaks with David Brooks about his book The Road to Character, the importance of words like “sin” and “virtue,” self-esteem vs. self-overcoming, the significance of keeping promises, honesty, President Trump, and other topics.
David Brooks is one of the nation’s leading writers and commentators. He is an op-ed columnist for The New York Times and appears regularly on the PBS NewsHour and Meet the Press. He is the bestselling author of The Social Animal, Bobos in Paradise, and The Road to Character.”
01) ‘Web Of Trust’ Browser Extension Cannot Be Trusted
“The popular browser extension is selling very detailed information about you to third parties.
Not all browser extensions can be trusted, though, and an investigation by German TV channel NDR has uncovered a serious breach of privacy by the Web Of Trust (WOT) service, which over 140 million Web surfers trust to help keep them safe online.
WOT has been around since 2007 and claims to be a “Safe Web Search & Browsing” service. What that boils down to is a website reputation and review system fueled by crowdsourcing. Users can view ratings on a per-site basis for trustworthiness and child safety or rate sites themselves.”
02) WOT Hatchet Job on My URL
What appears here at present is considerably different, from how the page looked in 2013.
The grocery list of false claims by “GURBL” has been trimmed down…though, it still remains a complete lie.
“Web of Trust” [Web of Lies, honestly] is set up in such a way, so as to grossly skew it’s “ratings”. They have “premium members” like “GURBL”, who has a history of dumping massive amounts of URLs into the WOT system.
You notice how my website has two instances of feedback?…On any normal website, this would give a 50/50 split in rating…WOT doesn’t work that way…
I don’t remember the exact number…maybe it’s 100…Maybe it’s 1000…But one feedback from someone like “GURBL”, holds the weight of that many individual responders. It would take that many regular responders, just to even things out to a 50/50 split…
WOT is designed, to allow one person to sink your ratings…to such an extent, that it’s nearly impossible to overcome it [if you even care to do so].
I suppose…since they claim to be used by 140 million users…that’s a sizable fraction of the internet population…Which makes this blatantly corrupt practice of theirs extra shitty…and identifies them as remarkably shitty people.
Honestly, I don’t know that it really changed anything for this blog…It’s never been allowed to grow uninhibited [until this incarnation]…So, it’s never gotten huge amounts of traffic…It’s just the whole idea, of what these internet bullies were trying to do…throw their power and resources around, like this…intentionally hurt smaller resources, like mine.
I did an expose on “Web of Trust”, some years ago…after discovering this…I’m not sure if I ever posted it, however.
They blurred out the graphical depiction they used, to represent my blog on their website!…
What did they censor?…
This blog header got censored…as if it were pornographic, or something…
The other things censored look to be the top of my “A Movie Night” sub-blog, and likely my “Steve Diamond is In/Out” graphic, for my instant messenger [or live chat room]…
…If this isn’t scummy behavior, then nothing is.
03) The Current Hatchet Job on This Incarnation of “Our Love Frontier”
Without “GURBL” having their grubby paws in this one, it’s an objectively better rating…but still, some people are lying their asses off, about this blog.
You can visit the website, and mouse over the “Reasons behind user ratings”, to get a better idea of what is being claimed.
At least one person deemed this blog to be a good site [Thank you!]…But most of these claims are couched in the douche bag language, of “may be doing this”, or “may be promoting that”, or “suspected of whatever”…
The absolutely false implications include pornography, gambling, “unproven or incorrect product claims”, “unethical” [aka more douche bag claims], hard to identify or contact me and “fraudulent site, attempting to obtain money, or something else of value”…
Excuse my choice of language…but anyone who regularly visits this blog knows, that these claims are horse shit on their face.
Neither pornography nor gambling have ever been promoted or exchanged here.
I don’t offer any products, for which I even can make a fraudulent claim.
“Unethical” is just a BS term, used by psychologically fragile people, attempting to censor this blog to whatever extent they can.
I am ultra easy to identify and contact…I was back on Blog.com, also…And I’ve progressively implemented large graphics on the right side of this blog, standing out and screaming to people, pointing them in the right direction…One is the “Welcome, Click Here First” graphic…It takes even the dumbest of idiots by the hand, and leads them through everything they need to know…including how to contact me!…
The general “phishing” claim has been repeated, I see…And it’s just a bold faced lie they threw in there, to dissuade people from visiting this blog. This blog has existed for about eight years…Financially, I’ve sunk probably $300 or more into the immediate “blog stuff” [extra services, URL, etc.]…It grows considerably, if you want to count things like my repeated buying of “Magix Music Maker”, and other software I use in the endeavor of blogging…The money I have gotten out of this blog, has amounted to absolutely nothing, whatsoever. Nowhere on this blog, will you find anything asking for your financial information, or other private information. The lies of WOT users, are self evident.
04) The Blog.com rating for this blog?
This incarnation has been gone for about five years…I don’t know if someone was just trying to be “funny”, in a nasty sort of way, and rub it into my face that ratings for my censored blog got excellent ratings by comparison…or if a few good natured people actually did give my blog good ratings, while it was still live…But it’s the only version with a good rating…and you cannot visit it…[though, I will be slowly rebuilding it, here at WordPress]…
Given their past history, it does not surprise me that “Web of Trust” would knife it’s own user base in the back…They have been dirty, ever since they arrived online.
These are people who have no business even being online, and should have had their service terminated years ago, for libeling, slander and online harassment…and just being internet bullies.
“Web of Trust” has been a terrible neighbor, to it’s fellow netizens.
01) Waking Up with Sam Harris #88 – Must We Accept a Nuclear North Korea? (with Mark Bowden)
“In this episode of the Waking Up podcast, Sam Harris speaks with Mark Bowden about the problem of a nuclear-armed North Korea.
Mark Bowden is the author of thirteen books, including the #1 New York Times bestseller Black Hawk Down. He reported at the Philadelphia Inquirer for twenty years and now writes for the Atlantic, Vanity Fair, and other magazines. He is also the writer in residence at the University of Delaware. His most recent book is Hue 1968: A Turning Point of the American War in Vietnam.”
“Everyone loves Poohbear, Tigger, Eeyore, and the others who live in the 100 Acre Wood… But have you ever wondered which of them you are the most like? Now you can find out! Just fill out these 12 simple questions and click the button for your results!”
I’ll accept the less flattering points with grace…I can get very wordy, after all…And I don’t claim that everything I explore through writing [or talking], I know on an expert level…
…But I have no problems writing about things I do know intimately…Other things, I tend to stay reserved when discussing them.
Interestingly…the owl is another symbol that’s been adopted within the BoyLove community…So, it’s curiously fitting.
“The family got the news on Christmas Eve 2014. My father had been diagnosed with Stage 4 bone cancer and Stage 3 lung cancer almost exactly a year after my grandfather died. We were all in shock.
On April 30, his final day, the family was sitting around his bed talking. He opened his eyes for the first time in days, looked at my mom long enough for her to say, “You can go, you are OK, we are OK. I love you so much.”
He took a breath, and then he was gone. He was at peace. I was at peace. But he had to endure so much before he got there.
If I had the chance, I would give someone opposed to Death with Dignity insight into what I went through. Until somebody goes through what you’ve gone through, they will never understand.”
“About nine years ago, 17.5 million people tuned into an episode of Grey’s Anatomy that, on the surface, appeared like any other — high-stakes surgery, high-drama love triangles. What those millions of Grey’s viewers didn’t know was that they were guinea pigs for a massive, secret experiment. That experiment was arguably a referendum about a single woman: Jennifer Jako, and her decision to become a mother. In 1991, at the age of 18, Jako had a one night stand with a high-school friend. It was the only time she’d ever had sex without a condom. She contracted HIV and spent years trying to debunk misconceptions: producing a documentary that aired on MTV, speaking at college campuses and on talk shows. Over time, the country’s view of HIV evolved. As people started living longer, stigma decreased. People generally understood that the infection wasn’t a death sentence any longer. But there was one area people couldn’t seem to understand: Pregnancy. Studies showed the general public simply didn’t know — or didn’t believe — that an HIV-positive woman, with the right treatment, had a tremendously low chance of passing the virus onto her baby — less than 2-percent at the time. Jennifer Jako got a cruel lesson in where the public stood when she appeared on the cover of Newsweek magazine, six months pregnant. Later, as an experiment, the Kaiser Family Foundation decided to see if they could move the needle by trying something totally different: product placement of medical information in a Grey’s Anatomy episode. In this episode of Only Human we tell the epic story of Jennifer Jako and how she managed to sneak into our livings rooms and, possibly, change public opinion forever.”
“Regressive professors are attempting to unionise.”
This is why I’ve come to reject most people, who claim to speak from authority about “pedophiles”…
…They don’t actually engage with pedophiles [or MAPs]…they simply project their own limited ideas about “pedophiles”.
…They often claim “authority” based upon one of two things…
…They’ve either gotten a degree from a college or university…or they claim to have been “abused by a pedophile”, at some point in their life…
…And they use this to shield themselves, while pretending as though they are some rightful controller of the dialogue…speech police…thought police…besmircher of character…
These people are not authorities.
…They are people who have been indoctrinated…some of them have been psychologically damaged…But they are not authorities concerning “pedophiles”.
They have no inherent right to speak against, speak abusively and threatening, or speak over, the MAP community, without us exposing them for the frauds and abusers they are.
Never be mean or cruel to those with a history of being abused [sexually or otherwise]…But don’t let them get away with passing along the abuse they received to MAPs, either.
You can demand a certain level of civility and integral behavior…It is only right, that they abide by it.
If they refuse…then you know the quality of character you are dealing with…and it is entirely fair, to point out what they are doing, the tactics they are using and folly of their words, right there in the immediate exchange you are having with them…
…They commonly run away and hide behind a block, when confronted with this.
…A lot of them seemingly cannot deal with the truth, or any form of self reflection…finding self correction and self regulation “unthinkable”…
One huge secret about most such people, is that they are paper tigers…Sometimes, they like to team up and attempt to overwhelm with frantic levels of noise and abuse [because this is their only hope of shouting down a self aware MAP]…but the point it dawns on them that they are out of their own depths…they virtually always cut and run…
Let them go…You’ve already stood your ground, and staunchly made your point.
You just made the person turn tail and run, who imagined they were going to target you, destroy and humiliate you in public…and somehow make you their bitch…
…What a sobering shock for these naïve individuals, to find out it’s not so easy after all…not when everything is fairly laid out on the table.
They are accustomed to the easy street, of relying on social bias talking points [and accusations]…They don’t know what to do, when confronted with valid resistance.
Do not be meek, or apologetic…
…It’s fine and laudable to show sympathy and empathy, towards the things they have personally gone through…but don’t ever allow them to get away, with placing the blame for that on you, or MAPs in general.
One of the core rules in standing up for yourself, standing your ground, arguing on behalf of something…public debating…is that you always project a confidence, knowledge, proof and truth [aka integrity].
…You can be guaranteed, that your would be assailant will be attempting to project the same against you…
…You are perfectly within your right, to know the facts and accurately employ the very same traits in your own defense [or in defense of MAPs].
“I was invited to address the Annual General Meeting of the Canadian Society for Academic Freedom (http://www.safs.ca/) on May 13, 2017. Dr. Marc Mercer, President of SAF, and professor in the Department of Philosophy of Halifax’s St. Mary’s University introduced me.
I would like to thank SAF for their support over the last year.
This talk focuses on the reasons that the right to free speech must be considered in some sense paramount among the intrinsic rights, rather than merely one value among many. There is no difference between free speech and free thought, for starters, and without free thought it is impossible to know oneself or the world.”