Monthly Archives: March 2015

How ‘One Nation’ Didn’t Become ‘Under God’ Until The ’50s Religious Revival…


Date: March 30, 2015

…How ‘One Nation’ Didn’t Become ‘Under God’ Until The ’50s Religious Revival…

…Direct Download Link [MP3]…

“[Kevin] Kruse’s book [“One Nation Under God”] investigates how the idea of America as a Christian nation was promoted in the 1930s and ’40s when industrialists and business lobbies, chafing against the government regulations of the New Deal, recruited and funded conservative clergy to preach faith, freedom and free enterprise. He says this conflation of Christianity and capitalism moved to center stage in the ’50s under Eisenhower’s watch.”

Very worth listening to.

Why Are Republican Governors Pro-Prison Rape?…


Date: March 27, 2015

…Why Are Republican Governors Pro-Prison Rape?…


“Cenk Uygur (host of The Young Turks) discusses the strange social acceptance of rape in prison. Republican governors are blocking a law that prevents sexual assault in prisons from taking affect. Cenk goes after governors, like Mike Pence (R) of Indiana, and holds them accountable.”

Yes…They want to be all up in your business, when you are “free” and trying to go about living your life, by passing anti-sex laws and laws that discriminate against sexual minorities…

…but when they throw you into prison, they just don’t care about what happens to you anymore…All the sexual brutalities imaginable, are “okay” with them…

This is the sort of thing, which comes from people holding onto a sense of “social undesirables”.

…They just want to be abusive and inhumane, towards those who they don’t like.

Greg Hunter: Saudi Arabia Invades Yemen, US helps Iran in Iraq, US Caves on Iran Nuke Deal…


Date: March 26, 2015

…Saudi Arabia Invades Yemen, US helps Iran in Iraq, US Caves on Iran Nuke Deal…


“Saudi Arabia and Egypt are getting ready for an invasion of Yemen. Saudi Arabia has already been bombing key positions of Iranian backed terrorists (also known as Houthi rebels). It was little more than six months ago that the President called Yemen a success in terms of fighting terror, but now the government has imploded, and al-Qaeda backed terrorists are fighting for control of the country with Iranian backed terrorists. Of course, Saudi Arabia and Egypt are enemies of the Iranians, and now it looks like the Saudis will also team up with al-Qaeda to drive out the Iranian terror group on its southern border in Yemen.

Meanwhile, in Iraq, the U.S. is conducting air strikes against ISIS, cousins to al-Qaeda, for the Iranian led attack to retake Tikrit. So, the Saudis, a U.S. ally, are teaming up with al-Qaeda to fight against the Iranian backed terrorists in Yemen, while the U.S. helps out the Iranians in Iraq. What happened to Syria?

We move on the negotiations over curtailing the Iranian nuclear deal, and we find out that the French are pushing for a better deal than the U.S. There are reports that the U.S. has caved into Iranian demands and will not be driving a very hard deal. For one thing, all Iranian sites will not be up for verification and inspection. This includes military sites that are deep underground.”

I don’t know how often I’ll be posting Greg Hunter videos, but I found this one interesting and informative.

Rethinking “Consent”…


Date: March 25, 2015

…I’m a little fuzzy…

…I’m a little fuzzy…

I like this response…

…Though I’m sorry to learn of [slipperyshota’s] ordeal with sex trafficking.

“Consent” is honestly a complicated ordeal, when we live in a world that forces it to be complicated.

…In a better world than this one, “consent” would hopefully not be the hang up point that it is today.

I’m guilty of using the word “consent” a fair bit…but reading BFG’s post, I started thinking along the softer lines of “agreeable sex”…Which, in part, is why your post caught my eye and made me respond.

“Consent” as the holy grail it is today, is really quite unhuman…And it does not reflect well, on how we honestly live and interact with each other…It’s more of a lofty ideal, than anything else.

…At it’s worst…it’s an impossible barrier to navigate.

I do agree, however…with those who say, if you agreed with a certain type of conduct and broke your commitment knowing the consequences…then you are in some type of fault…

…But I also agree with those who say…In a better world, people would be far more open minded, than to box everyone into tight social restraints.

I don’t know if what I’ve said answers anything for BFG…But I kind of like it…It’s deep, and off the beaten path…I’ll probably post it on my blog…

Feminism is the Establishment…


Date: March 21, 2015

…Feminism is the Establishment…


Note: There is lots of swearing, and at least one instance of explicit sexual depiction [a sculpture], included in this video.

“Feminists now have to defend their choke-hold on the British establishment from attacks from the real world and people who are suffering the consequences of their unbridled selfishness.

Not satisfied with feminists in every political party, feminist domination of academia and young women now out-earning young men, feminists insist that the skyrocketing male suicide rate is their own fault.”

Sargon of Akkad can often get crass…but I find his videos thought provoking, and generally quite sound. Thought I’d share this one, because it concerns a very important, modern social unrest…one which is becoming quite disturbing, in my opinion.

“Feminism is the Establishment”, really says a lot…and reflects what so many of us out here are seeing. What is going on at the popular forefront of “feminism”, has lost it’s way…It’s not about equality…It’s about dominance and subjugation…manipulation…And much of it is just self entitled, angry, ugly, spiteful abuse.

This has got to end…It’s why so many of us are disgusted and fed up, with this wave of “feminism”…They’re not honestly pushing for anything positive, anymore…They’re just trying to bludgeon censorship into our cultures, and impose ideological extremes…of which, some are blatantly dishonest and cruel.

Feminism has been hijacked by the power hungry, self entitled extremists…people pushing their own social agendas, who don’t care about healthy cultural cohesion…And that is why I find it so alarming and offensive, despite that I embrace and practice feminism’s own historic core principles, myself.

I sincerely question at this phase…if feminism has not outlived it’s true usefulness…and maybe it needs to dissolve, so that something more relevant and balanced can take it’s place?

Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV – 03/15/2015 (FULL EPISODE)…


Date: March 21, 2015

…Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV – 03/15/2015 (FULL EPISODE)…


“Published on Mar 15, 2015

01:00 – “Ferguson PD Worse Than We Thought.” Chauncey DeVega gives us the latest out of Ferguson, which includes a DOJ report that shows how racism was rampant among Ferguson PD. #HandsUpDontShoot

09:10 – “Your Employer Doesn’t Have Your Back.” Michael Burg will discuss the assault on workers compensation that is leaving injured workers with no recourse. #LaborLaws

19:02 – “UBS Just Blew Your Retirement Fund.” Peter Mougey will give us the latest details on criminal banking activity, specifically the UBS Puerto Rico con game. #TooBigToJail

30:41 – “Corporations Spending More; Workers Get Less.” Bryce Covert in Washington, D.C. will tell us why corporations are spending more on buying back their own stocks than they are on the workers that keep their companies running. #InvestInWorkers

39:16 – “The Republican Fear Con.” Howard Nations will explain how fear is used by the Republican leadership to manipulate voters. #FearSells”

Album: Great Rights!…

………..
….

Date: March 17, 2015

Great Rights! [22:51]

01) Exorable


02) Heart of Gold (E-Piano-Smooth)


03) Gadabout


04) Angularity


05) Sweet Dreams [acoustic guitar]


06) Neo


07) Generations


“Great Rights!” is my eighth musical album. At 22 minutes and 51 seconds, it’s tending towards the shorter of my albums…but there is still some good stuff here. I confess, that I padded this one with a few tracks I was not going to release…but later figured, why not?

Exorable – A nice track…jazz…Not really a personal favorite, but it works as a song.

Heart of Gold (E-Piano-Smooth) – A highlight…This one turned out really nice.

Gadabout – Glorified bumper music, honestly…but it’s pretty cool.

Angularity – Nice…Not really deep…but slow and haunting…

Sweet Dreams [acoustic guitar] – Another highlight, and a personal favorite.

Neo – Rescued from a “warehouse” folder, where it was likely to be forgotten…I have to admit, this one is actually pretty decent.

Generations – The most “iffy” track here…Mixing the different genres like this, was experimental…very. I didn’t intend to release this, ever…But it’s kind of cool…and this collection needed some padding…A good track to bring things to an end, I think.

….

……………………………………………

Pedophilia: Myths, Realities and Treatments…


Date: March 17, 2015

…Pedophilia: Myths, Realities and Treatments…


“Are adults who are sexually attracted to children a danger to society? Are present treatments and criminal penalties counter-productive? Can people be “cured” of pedophilia?

Dick’s guest is Dr. Fred Berlin, founder and director of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorder Clinic.”

I always have very mixed feelings about these kinds of interviews.

…I appreciate the level headed dialogue, and that a good bit of solid information is presented…But I will never find it anything but a tasteless rub, being compared to drunk driving alcoholics.

That is not intended as a cheap shot at alcoholics…It’s just that pedophilia and alcoholism are two very, very different issues…

By trying to make parallels between the two, Fred is reaffirming the negative social taint on pedophilia.

…Some of us reject this social construct, that pedophilia is a negative thing…We reject that it deserves to be presented in a negative light.

This is why it is so hard, to embrace someone like Fred Berlin, and his ideas and behaviors…

…Some of Fred’s ideas are fundamentally and critically [irreconcilably] at odds, with my very life philosophy…with so, so much of my own journey in life, and what knowledge it has equipped me with…I had my world changing epiphany, and transcended the notion that “people are sick for having an attraction, and for seeking to love”, years and years ago…The layers of insulation, haze and manipulation, were slowly, consistently peeled from my eyes…and a whole new world of possibilities opened up in front of me…

…I cannot scrub this from my mind, and retreat back into blind ignorance.

…Which is why, for all his good intentions [and despite that I’m still willing to link and share this content]…I cannot, in good conscience, endorse Fred Berlin…

…But life is a lot more complicated than just these points, isn’t it?

I still appreciate much of what Fred says in this interview.

Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV – 03/08/2015 (FULL EPISODE)…


Date: March 15, 2015

…Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV – 03/08/2015 (FULL EPISODE)…


“Published on Mar 9, 2015

00:59 – “TPP Sale Echoes Broken NAFTA Promises.” Howard Nations will tell us how the Obama administration’s TPP sales pitch echoes the same empty promises that were used to sell NAFTA. #TPP

12:20 – “Progressives Too Silent on Loretta Lynch.” David Hersh will explain the lack of progressive outcry against AG nominee Loretta Lynch, and why we need to be very wary of her confirmation. #GetMadGetLoud

22:41 – News with Pap and Sam.”

===

Is This Child Pornography, By Legal Standards?…

……
….

Date: March 11, 2015

…[Provided for reference]The Power Of The Clitoris…

When looking into my last post, I happened upon something else by chance…and I just could not allow this to pass, without documenting and sharing it.

I noticed the section below an article, where they have pictures and links to other stories that “might interest you”…a graphic connected to an interview about the clitoris…

This graphic is used in the actual show footage, where this interview is taking place.

I want to explain something about “child pornography”, by it’s legal definition…and I think this is something, which most people are unaware of…

Anymore, in the United States, you can be charged and convicted of “child pornography” possession/production/distribution…even when there was no legal minor [let alone, actual child] involved, at any stage in the process. What they’ve expanded it to these days, includes content which merely purveys the idea, of a “child” [a legal minor] in a situation which stimulates the sexual arousal in anyone at all.

…Because of this, people who are of legal age have been tainted with the stigma of “child pornography”, due to things like wearing “schoolgirl uniforms”…or dressing up like a high school cheerleader, while in a porn shoot. Basically, if they do anything that conveys they are “imitating a child” [a legal minor], then they can be accused of participating in the creation of “child pornography”…This can even include such things, as having a naïve, “child like” look on their face.

In addition…we’ve seen the rise of a social sentiment, where in the inability to distinguish the legality of any “sexual” content, might get it branded “child pornography”…simply because you cannot tell by looking at it, whether all participants are of legal age.

…This is, admittedly, “thought crime” territory…As in, if “that” picture incites “those” thoughts in you, then in a case by case basis…you are guilty of “possessing child pornography”, because it is “an equivalent” to you.

…Don’t believe me?…Go do your own research, and find out just how convoluted “child pornography” law has become…Taken to it’s logical conclusion, you can barely even define, what is or is not legally defined “child pornography”, anymore…And there are many deep, dangerous problems in this.

What struck me about this graphic used here [openly, on the Huffington post website]…is that the model photographed could just as easily be a ten year old female, as it could be a twelve year old female…as it could be a fifteen year old female…as it could be a seventeen year old female…as it could be a eighteen year old female…as it could be a twenty one year old female…

How is any onlooker expected to determine?…And what exactly does anyone have to say about it, should someone grab a copy of that picture…pretend it is a teen, or pre-teen girl…and masturbate to it, fantasy style…because it adequately fits the individuals aesthetic requirement?

In the subjective, unequal quagmire “child pornography” law has become…how are we left denying, that this might be “child pornography”?

I don’t know that this isn’t a pre-teen, or a very young teen…Do you?

…She is clearly hairless, in such a way that emulates a pre-teen…She is also wearing what I might suggest, looks like underwear a young girl would be inclined to wear…Plus, she is posed in such a manner, that is sexually suggestive…And she is slightly pulling them down with her thumb, exposing a tiny bit of pubic area…

So…what, exactly, stops this from being “child pornography”, by legal standards, hosted and made available to the general public on the Huffington Post website?

In the legal world we are forced to live in, today…I see absolutely no way to make that distinction.

Now…reality is…that is almost certainly a female, of at least eighteen years in age…But notice how they think nothing, of the way they’ve packaged and presented this picture…It is vague, and it appeals in a very forward manner, to people’s natural attraction to the young…It appeals to the “barely legal” crowd…that crowd amongst us, who would…as soon as anything becomes legal and willing…

…Because the strict letter of the law means so very much, to what gives us all an erection…right?

…It’s never anything about the individuals, themselves…It’s all about those laws written by governments, what makes us all hot and horny about a situation…right?

If old statesmen [and stateswomen] telling us what we can, and cannot, get sexually excited over holds so much power over us…then why aren’t we all out humping law books right now?…Seems to me, visiting a law library should be as good as going to a porn store…right?

…Aren’t these the ultimate source of what drives us, sexually?…laws and permission from overlords?…

…No?…

If we can be honest, about the hyperbolic nature of my last five or six insincere sentences…then why cant we be honest, about what all else is going on here?

I defy you to prove to me, that Huffington Post is not distributing “child pornography” on it’s website…and to explain to me, why this entire set of circumstances [including the legal minefield] is okay…or not.

You see…it is all subjective…There is no right or wrong answer, as relates to the example given.

…The answer could just as easily be “yes”, as it could be “no”…Because we are not talking about an equally enforced, clearly defined set of laws.

…We are talking about a house of cards, a stacked deck…an uneven battleground…where “the undesirables” can be subjectively railroaded into prison…and it is all made to seem perfectly clear and correct…

…When it is anything but.

….

……………………………………………