Date: December 20, 2016
Date: December 19, 2016
“The FBI arrested this past week Sean Krishanmakoto Sharma, 26, from La Canada, California, for launching DDoS attacks against Chatango, an online chat service.
According to court documents, Sharma, who is a USC graduate, purchased DDoS firepower from Xtreme Stresser, an online DDoS-for-hire service.
He used this service to attack Chatango and brought down the company’s services on different occasions for a two-month period, between November 6, 2014 and January 20, 2015.”
I used to use Chatango, until the DDoS attacks started.
After Google bought and killed Meebo, Chatango was the only thing I could find, that was reasonably similar…
…Then that idiot forced me into a third long search, to find another service I could find acceptable.
It’s good to see he is getting his just deserts, for interrupting my flow and wasting my time.
Date: December 19, 2016
“Done at Violence Children Studio”
Articles and content from Minor Attracted People [MAPs], presented in no particular order and without preference or discrimination. These are diverse viewpoints.
Note: All BoyChat links will include their corresponding TOR URL to use in the TOR Browser, as well as their normal BoyChat URL. TOR2WEB is being used as a stop gap, in combating malicious attacks against BoyChat and it’s community.
Date: December 19, 2016
Todd Nickerson interview
02) Baldur: Article: Calling bullshit on dumb S.O. laws
03) LordTeognis: These times are difficult…
04) man of one way: Remember our heroes
To the people who have maliciously attacked BoyChat…
…It would be satisfying to discover, that all of you will be sued and criminally prosecuted…and that you will spend time in prison for this…But we all know how this rigged game is played…And we all know that is not going to happen in this era. Consider yourselves lucky, that you are not going to get what you deserve.
As to your flimflam about a certain idiot woman being “doxed” on BoyChat, and your supposed White Knighting on her behalf…
…The individual in question, is a sociopath who has gone well out of her way, chronically and over a long period of time, to stalk, harass, threaten, dehumanize, censor and endanger MAPs, who were doing nothing beyond using online social resources in scrupulously legal ways.
After the very real impact of this sociopath’s behavior, some MAPs have started documenting and publishing her behaviors, in response to them.
This is a perfectly reasonable and justified action.
That a few of these were posted at BoyChat is also reasonable, on account that some of us MAPs also frequent BoyChat, and find this information to be relevant.
This is a person who has threatened me, personally…As such, I am entitled to know who she is…I am also entitled to share this information, with anyone else I witness being threatened by her.
This situation is a prime example, of why I absolutely loathe you sorts…
One, or more, of you decides to create some insurmountable conflict with our community…Any kind of response comes back from us, and you start acting like we are doing something horrible to you…
…No…This is all your doing…This is all on your heads…You have no victims amongst you, in regards to this.
The answer to entirely avoiding these kinds of situations, is common decency and respect…
One good thing did come of this, however…
…I’m now much better set up, to ride through any DDoS attacks on BoyChat, without missing a beat…That is objectively good.
We are becoming more resilient, as a community…learning and spreading various alternate ways of accessing BoyChat…So, go swallow that pill.
If you’re a Minor Attracted Person [MAP] who would like your content featured in the next issue, please use the form below to pass along the necessary information.
You may also submit content created by other MAPs. Any form of legal content [written, audio, video, artistic, academic, personal expression, etc.] will be considered for inclusion.
All submissions made via this form are private.
Date: December 18, 2016
On November 19th, 2016, you insulted me in a very public manner, for having done nothing more than share another MAPs media on my blog.
Since your Twitter account is already shut down, I presume you are a troll and it got terminated.
Despite that I explained the situation to you, you lacked the decency to apologize to me…Therefor, I wrote the following.
Let it serve as a message to all, who are inclined to behave in the noxious manner you have.
I do my best to idiot proof what I do online, to prevent others from putting their foot into their own mouth…
You, however…are one of those highly special cases, that seem beyond help.
You read a tweet from my account…an account on which I clearly state in spoken audio, that I do not endorse everything I tweet or retweet…
…That’s strike one…
Due to the nature of the tweet in question, I know that you had to visit my blog to view the video…At my blog, I have an audio recording right in plain sight, titled “no blanket endorsements”…where I explain the exact same thing as above…You continued on obliviously…
…That’s strike two…
You read the post in question, out of a series I designed for highlighting other people’s media…It’s very much like my M.A. Voice series, where I make it clear that I am merely featuring other people’s content…It should go without saying [not that I haven’t said it], that I don’t endorse every single thing about what shows up in the M.A. TV series…That you could not seem to comprehend this?…
…That’s strike three…
You start off on a nasty foot, with “Gobsmacked by your level of tosh.”, which appears to be an ad hominem…If I’m interpreting this right, then you’re calling me stupid…You continue on with “Your argument is about the way he WORDED his reply???”, which is a complete strawman [Do not put words I’ve never said, into my mouth!]…and follow with a #facepalm hashtag, to make sure your unjustified demeaning of me had a wide audience…
…That’s strike four…
I told you directly, no less than twice, that the media and post title were not of my making…I was merely sharing them with my audience…You ignored this, entirely…
…That’s strike five…
You’re only response was “And do you realise that a view/argument can be stated in a comment? “his barbarity…”…A retort which says absolutely nothing, except for the fact that you don’t understand what nuance or context is.
…That’s strike six…
Your retort makes no sense…Of course I realize a view and argument “can” be made in a comment…That does not make the view or comment MINE…Given that you were attacking me, personally, and trying to hold me responsible for the content creators words, we both know that you were approaching me, with fundamental misunderstandings about what was objectively happening.
Your bullheaded attempt at hanging onto your stubborn assertion, is a non sequitur…It completely sidesteps the objective facts, and abruptly shifts from your original, smug attack…to something even more distorted and vague.
…Yet, you don’t seem to have the integrity to own up to it, and make peace…like any decent, mature person would do.
Since you likely don’t know what ad hominem or non sequitur mean…
Ad hominem is when you react or argue against a person, instead of a position they hold…With the bigger jerks, this usually takes the form of personal insults.
…And I’d like to take a moment to observe, that you offered absolutely nothing in response to the substance of the media in question…instead only insulting me on a personal level…all the while, displaying that the message of that media went straight over your head.
Non sequitur is when one tries to make a statement or conclusion, which does not logically follow from a previous statement or argument…And given the facts that are coming to light, you totally pulled a non sequitur.
Strawman…Ad hominem…Non sequiturs…Anyone who employs these tactics, has nothing of relevance to say…And you hit all three of these, right out of the gate.
Shall I explain what nuance and context mean, also?…You clearly have no concept of those, either.
…You are an absolute train wreck of “tosh”.
Date: December 18, 2016
“Changes to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure broaden the government’s hacking ability by removing restrictions on search warrants. The amended Rule 41 allows judges to issue search warrants that let the government hack into computers and devices outside the judge’s jurisdiction, and it allows bulk hacking of multiple computers at once.
First, Brooke speaks with Rainey Reitman of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who explains how the changes came about and what concerns her organization has about them — as well as what EFF is bracing for under the incoming Trump administration.
Then, Brooke speaks with Senator Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), who tried and failed to get the Senate to hold a hearing on the Rule 41 changes. He explains why he thinks they go too far and why so many of his colleagues were unwilling to even consider debating them.”