Date: September 20, 2019
01) How You Can Help End Homelessness!
“Thom Hartmann is joined by two people who are helping former homeless people get off the street permanently and how you can help too!
What other ways are there to end homelessness and will this be a national priority for the nation?”
Date: September 20, 2019
01) Working Families Party Faces Backlash for Endorsement of Warren Over Sanders
Date: September 20, 2019
01) Trump Breaks Record
“Trump could not stop lying at his rally in New Mexico.
RIO RANCHO, N.M. — President Donald Trump, looking to put New Mexico in play in 2020, sought to win over Hispanic voters at a rally here Monday.
The president’s pitch to Hispanic voters seemed to silo them off from the rest of the electorate, including the rally crowd (“We love our Hispanics”). It featured an assertion that they had a greater understanding of the source of the drug problem than other Americans. And it included a section in which Trump wondered how CNN contributor Steve Cortes could be Hispanic even though, the president said, he appeared to be of Northern European descent.
“He happens to be Hispanic, but I never quite figured it out because he looks more like a WASP than I do,” Trump said of Cortes, who was in the audience.
From the stage, he asked Cortes: “Who do you like more, the country or the Hispanics?” Cortes appeared to mouth “country,” to which Trump replied: “I don’t know. I may have to go for the Hispanics, to be honest with you. We got a lot of Hispanics.”
Date: September 20, 2019
01) Panel: Biden and Warren fall, Bernie Surges
“Team Rising breaks down the latest 2020 polling.”
|
||
| …. |
Date: September 20, 2019
“Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[1][2] Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[3] criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[4] A person must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.[4][5] Pedophilia is termed pedophilic disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), and the manual defines it as a paraphilia involving intense and recurrent sexual urges towards and fantasies about prepubescent children that have either been acted upon or which cause the person with the attraction distress or interpersonal difficulty.[4] The International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) defines it as a “sustained, focused, and intense pattern of sexual arousal—as manifested by persistent sexual thoughts, fantasies, urges, or behaviours—involving pre-pubertal children.” – wikipedia” There is plenty of issue that needs to be taken with that description… …and I don’t think I am ever going to get past, anyone saying that intergenerational sexual relations is “rightly stigmatized”. Pedophilia is different from pedophilic disorder. You can be a pedophile, and not have pedophilic disorder. Pedophilic disorder, is when pedophilia causes you such distress, that it stops you from being able to live your life…It’s not merely being a pedophile. |
…. |
| Sub-Blog Archive | M.A. Net |
||
|
||||||||||||
| …. |
Date: September 20, 2019
Match 1: Pope Francis VS Tinothy LionCrow with Dr. Shill – 73%
Match 2: Sacred Cow & Wildabeast VS Loli & Shota Con – 83% [Tag Team Championship] Match 3: Mel Chen VS FAmos Banana – 74% Main Event:
Magnificent Championship: Match 4: Pan VS Pedo Bear – 66% SHOW HIGHLIGHTS:
|
…. | ||||||||||
  |
||||||||||||
|
||
| …. |
Date: September 17, 2019
“Nudity around people of different ages is commonplace in many cultures, although many Americans are fearful that exposure to naked bodies—especially those of family members—will harm their children. I believe that nudity should be treated as something natural, but unremarkable. Parents will be comfortable with different degrees of nakedness, depending on their own background and body image. Some families are comfortable showering or visiting saunas together. Others may be more comfortable only being naked around same-sex members. Still, other parents may be reluctant to undress in front of a child, much less hold a conversation while nude. But remember that your attitudes towards nudity will shape your child’s future in a variety of ways. Children have a natural curiosity about nudity. Being naked around your children—whether occasionally or regularly—can teach them what a “normal” adult body looks like. Modeling comfort with and respect for your body can become a basis for a healthy body image as your child grows and experiences the changes of adolescence. Here are some tips for about how to handle nudity in your family.” |
…. |
 |
||
Date: September 17, 2019
01) FreeSpeechTube
02) About
“Short description
Non-partisan video platform with a focus on free speech.
Description
Online video platform FreeSpeechTube (freespeechtube.org) is managed and maintained by nonprofit foundation Stichting FreeSpeechTube (sfstube.nl). Both the platform and foundation reside in the Netherlands, Europe. Obviously, the foundation board does not agree with all the ideas and thoughts expressed in videos on FreeSpeechTube.
General video-sharing websites, such as YouTube, frequently aim to create mainstream advertiser-friendly environments. Even if your lawful video is ad-free, it may be removed if it is deemed harmful to the emotional or physical well-being of certain visitors, such as minors.
Video-sharing websites with more relaxed policies, such as LiveLeak, remove fewer videos. However, your video will be surrounded by graphic content, including footage of explicit violence and visible injuries.
FreeSpeechTube delivers a third option; middle ground. While not without limitations (see Terms of service), we neither have advertisers to worry about, nor do we allow graphic violence. If you feel like breaking a taboo, this is the place to publicly share your controversial opinions and ideas.
Status
Updates on Twitter and Gab.
Also in the Dutch-language Rapporten.”
There is finally a video hosting website, where even MAP’s, BoyLovers, Girl-Lovers, Child Lovers, Teen Lovers, Nepiophiles, Pedophiles, Hebephiles, Ephebophiles, MAP Loving Kids/Youth and yes…even Zoophiles, can upload and share their thoughts, productions and media, without fear of it being callously deleted and banned for no legitimate reason.
This wonderful website is known as Free Speech Tube!
I have an account there, myself…one of the earliest to open and start uploading.
This forum is open to all comers [including people who believe themselves to be “normal”], so long as they stay within the terms of service.
Very exciting development in the MAP, etc. community!
I hope you’ll visit, and check things out.
|
||
| …. |
Date: September 17, 2019
“Under plans confirmed by ministers today (17 September 2019), the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme will be extended to 14 new offences. * 14 new offences added to Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme * prison terms for a range of sexual offences to come into scope * part of wider action to ensure punishment properly reflects severity of crimes Criminals convicted of stalking, harassment, child sexual abuse and other sex offences could see their sentences increased if victims or the public think their punishment is too lenient. Under plans confirmed by ministers today (17 September 2019), the Unduly Lenient Sentence (ULS) scheme will be extended to 14 new offences – giving victims the power to query the sentences of a wider range of crimes. The scheme gives anyone the power to ask the Attorney General to consider referring a sentence to the Court of Appeal for reconsideration – where it could then be potentially increased if deemed unduly lenient. In July, such an intervention increased the sentence of a mother who allowed her partner to rape her daughter from three to five years behind bars. Crimes such as murder, robbery, and a range of terror offences are already covered, however the government has pledged to extend the scheme to further protect the public and make sure victims see justice done. The move will bring offences including controlling and coercive behaviour within scope as well as further child sexual abuse offences, such as those involving the taking, distributing and publishing of indecent images of children and abusing a position of trust with a child.” Sounds kind of like a revival on the Roman Coliseum…Take all the “undesirables”, and turn them into a manipulable object to satisfy a vindictive public. |
…. |
|
…..TAP-Net Website | Sub-Blog Archive |
||
Date: September 17, 2019
01) Cancel Culture: What Exactly Is This Thing?
“What is cancel culture, and is it improving society or making it worse?
The answer to those questions largely depends on who you ask. Some people, particularly those who consider themselves targets or victims of cancelation campaigns, argue that it is a dangerous trend in American culture, one that is actively stifling art, media, science, education, and free thought. Others argue that cancel culture is just another term for accountability, and that invoking the spectre of cancel culture is just a way of dodging responsibility for one’s actions.
But what is cancelation, exactly? There’s no one answer to this—the definition, it turns out, is largely in the eye of the beholder—but I think of it as a form of social and cultural boycott. The goal isn’t restoration or even analysis; it’s excommunication.
…
Call-outs began as a utopian ideal, a way of extracting justice and change without cops or courts. But then came the internet. Activist Loretta Ross wrote about this recently in the New York Times: “My experiences with call-outs began in the 1970s as a young black feminist activist,” she wrote. “I sharply criticized white women for not understanding women of color. I called them out while trying to explain intersectionality and white supremacy.” Forty years later, after watching call-outs migrate from in-person to online, Ross has come to the conclusion that this trend isn’t just counterproductive but actually toxic.
“Call-outs are justified to challenge provocateurs who deliberately hurt others, or for powerful people beyond our reach,” Ross writes. “Effectively criticizing such people is an important tactic for achieving justice. But most public shaming is horizontal and done by those who believe they have greater integrity or more sophisticated analyses. They become the self-appointed guardians of political purity.
…the difference between cancelation and critique. “Critique involves listening and understanding, and then perhaps trying to change the minds of those who disagree. Instead of trying to change people’s minds, the mob removes them from view.”
