Republicans Using Slave Owners’ Favorite Bible Verse To Justify Child Prisons…

7 Replies


Date: June 17, 2018

01) Republicans Using Slave Owners’ Favorite Bible Verse To Justify Child Prisons

“Clearly disturbed by the widespread moral outcry against the Trump administration’s decision to separate children from their parents at the U.S. border, Attorney General Jeff Sessions used a Biblical passage on Thursday to justify extreme immigration enforcement. “I would like to cite to you the Apostle Paul and his clear and wise command in Romans 13,” Sessions said in a speech to law enforcement officers in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Sessions went on to insist that the Bible argues Christians must “obey the laws of the government because God has ordained them for the purpose of order.”

It’s fitting that Sessions turned to Romans 13. The text has a long track record of being used by Christians attempting to defend immoral public policy. In the 1850s, when slave masters paid preachers and public theologians to defend the plantation economy against abolitionists, Romans 13 was one of the most cited texts of slaveholder religion as well.

Citation:
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/bible-verse-jeff-sessions-used-defend-immigration-crackdown-once-also-ncna883676“

First Trump Official Goes To Jail…

Leave a reply


Date: June 16, 2018

01) BOOM: First Trump Official Goes To Jail

“Washington (CNN)Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort will await his trial for foreign lobbying charges from jail.

Two weeks after Robert Mueller’s prosecutors dropped new accusations of witness tampering on him, US District Judge Amy Berman Jackson Friday revoked Manafort’s bail, which allowed him out on house arrest.

The order marks an end to months of attempts from Manafort to lighten his house arrest restrictions after he was charged and pleaded not guilty to foreign lobbying violations.
“The harm in this case is harm to the administration of justice and harm to the integrity of the court’s system,” Berman Jackson told Manafort in court.”

Citation:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/15/politics/judge-sends-paul-manafort-to-jail-pending-trial/index.html“

You’ll Soon Be Able to Manufacture Anything You Want and Governments Will Be Powerless to Stop It…

Leave a reply


Date: June 15, 2018

01) You’ll Soon Be Able to Manufacture Anything You Want and Governments Will Be Powerless to Stop It

“From DIY guns to designer drugs, classic-car parts, and human livers, 3D printing promises a dynamic and uncontrollable world.

In the very near future, governments will lose the ability to keep guns, drones, and other forbidden goods out of the hands of their subjects. They’ll also be rendered impotent to enforce trade and technology embargoes. Power is shifting from the state to individuals and small groups courtesy of additive manufacturing—aka 3D printing—technology.

Additive manufacturing is poised to revolutionize whole industries—destroying some jobs while creating new opportunities. That’s according to a recent report from the prestigious RAND Corporation, and there’s plenty of evidence to support the dynamic and “disruptive” view of the future that the report promises.”

Uh Oh!…

…How are they going to stop people from making their own “child sex dolls”, which they’ve passed laws against?!!

…And what if someone programs in a sculpture, of two gorgeous, hot and sexy eight year old boys, sixty-nineing each other?!!

…I wonder how long it would take them to pass a law against that?…The sculpture, I mean!…

Hmmmm…Another sort of product [3D printers], to leave rave reviews on?…

…I dare say, there’s an endless supply of items out there, that “a pedophile could stoke their perversion with”…

…Lotions…anything soft and fluffy…children’s toys…a jar of smooth peanut butter…Hell, even your sitting government representative is likely to have something [anything, whatsoever] on their official website, that might “remind you of your burning, pedophilic desires, and send you into a lustful rage”…

I dare say…the entire internet is “child porn”, if you’re creative enough…and full of enough B.S…Even those pain in the ass fanatics will have some skeletons found in their closet, to the “properly discerning eye”…

…I’m feeling way too devious, tonight…and laughing a lot…

Congress moves to ban child sex robots favored by pedophiles…

3 Replies


Date: June 15, 2018

01) Congress moves to ban child sex robots favored by pedophiles

“Washington — The U.S. House approved a ban Wednesday on the importation and trafficking of anatomically correct child sex dolls and robots that “normalize sex between adults and minors.”

The proposal was approved in the House by a voice vote and now moves to the Senate.

“These dolls can be programmed to simulate rape. The very thought makes me nauseous,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, a Virginia Republican.

Child sex dolls are one niche of a nascent robotic sex industry that has generated debate about the ethics of the use of lifelike machines for sexual activity. It is a subject that turns from squeamish to outright revulsion for many when it touches on child sex dolls and robots.”

People “distraught” over the existence of sex dolls?…

…Yes…these white knights dream of a day, when silicone dolls and “robots” can breathe a sigh of relief…and finally feel safe from rape…

…A “rape” they cannot even possibly comprehend, as they are not living entities…and cannot be psychologically damaged, from any sex act.

Well, hey…

…Sometimes sex toys need laws to protect them from being used…right?

Hey!…It’s a protection “sex rights” bill, for sex toys!

…Wow…Who would have ever thought?…

How long do you think it will take them, to start outlawing other sex toys?…

…I mean…there is no legal or logical basis, on which they can outlaw these…and yet fail to outlaw anything else, that they imagine “titillates the mind of pedophiles”.

I just wonder what would happen, if a fed up group of people [maybe a hundred or so] decided to start roaming around the internet, leaving rave reviews on every sex toy they can find…talking about how it “helps them reach climax, while fantasizing about raping two year old children in the anus”…While simultaneously having a group of “concerned citizens” taking screen shots [before the reviews get deleted], and sending them to their representatives in government, with accompanied demands to do something about it…

…Some congressmen would love to pass such a law…Do you think they’d dare enrage the larger population of “sex perverts”, just to “come after the pedophiles”?…

…And if they didn’t dare…something tells me there might be a useful edge in that, as well.

These “representatives” want to be an obscene pain in the ass?…

…I think they should have an obscene pain in the ass, right back at them…ten fold.

What the End of Net Neutrality Actually Means…

Leave a reply


Date: June 15, 2018

01) What the End of Net Neutrality Actually Means

“On June 11, the Federal Communications Commission officially ended network neutrality rules that were put in place three years ago by the Obama administration. Opponents decried the move. “Now your cable company can scam you for more money, censor websites, and slow down online content,” according to the Battle for the Net campaign by nonprofit advocacy groups Fight for the Future, Free Press and Demand Progress. “People are angry. And rightly so.” Meanwhile, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and his family reportedly continue to receive death threats due to the decision.

But the situation is more complicated than what the inflammatory rhetoric would suggest. “There is this misunderstanding that net neutrality is kind of this catch-all provision that prevents broadband companies from doing bad things. It’s not,” said Kevin Werbach, Wharton professor of legal studies and business ethics who worked at the FCC under the Clinton administration, on the Knowledge@Wharton show that airs on SiriusXM channel 111. “What it has to do with is [banning] certain kinds of discriminatory practices about the treatment of data.”

Net neutrality is a set of rules ensuring that wired and mobile broadband providers — primarily cable and phone companies — treat all data transmissions that go through their pipes or airwaves equally, irrespective of content as long as it’s lawful, and subject to reasonable network management practices. When broadband providers manage data flows, they need to have a legitimate reason such as alleviating internet traffic congestion. What they can’t do, for example, is purposely hamper a rival company. Comcast cannot lawfully block the video streams of Netflix just because it is a rival of Hulu, which it partly owns.

The FCC’s 2015 Open Internet Order that established net neutrality rules bans the blocking and throttling of lawful content, applications, services and devices. It also prohibits “paid prioritization,” which creates favored “fast lanes” on the web. For example, Amazon cannot pay or otherwise compensate Verizon to speed up internet traffic going to its website to get an edge over other online shopping sites. Even if some prioritization benefits consumers, Obama’s FCC argued that “the threat of harm is overwhelming” if it allowed the practice.”

U.S. Withdrawal from Human Rights Council “Imminent” After U.N. Condemns Israel for Gaza Massacre…

Leave a reply


Date: June 15, 2018

01) U.S. Withdrawal from Human Rights Council “Imminent” After U.N. Condemns Israel for Gaza Massacre

“The Trump administration will reportedly withdraw the United States from the U.N.’s Human Rights Council. Reuters reports the decision is “imminent” and comes after the U.N. General Assembly voted 120 to 8 on Wednesday to condemn Israel over its massacre of Palestinians protesting nonviolently against Israel’s occupation. We speak with Philip Alston, the United Nations special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. He will speak in front of the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva next week about poverty in the United States.”